Skip to main content
Log in

The structure of marketing channel relationships

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Distribution channel research has been advanced in recent years by contributions based on the political economy paradigm, transaction cost analysis, and relationship marketing. Drawing on these bodies of thought, we propose a new conceptualization of the structure of marketing channel relationships. Relationship structure is defined in terms of decision-making structure and operational integration. The proposed model of channel structure antecedents and consequences is consistent with the major research paradigms but extends beyond simple categorical assemblages of constructs to provide an ordered set of relationships based on theory and empirical research. This conceptualization reconciles some apparent contradictions in the literature and provides a clear focus for structure, process, and performance research in channels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achrol, Ravi. 1991. “Evolution of the Marketing Organization: New Forms for Turbulent Environments.”Journal of Marketing 55 (October): 71–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Achrol, Ravi, Torger Reve, and Louis W. Stern. 1983. “The Environment of Marketing Channel Dyads: A Framework for Comparative Analysis.”Journal of Marketing 47 (Fall): 55–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Achrol, Ravi and Louis W. Stern. 1988. “Environmental Determinants of Decision-Making Uncertainty in Marketing Channels.”Journal of Marketing Research 25 (February): 36–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alderson, Wroe. 1954. “Factors Governing the Development of Marketing Channels.” InMarketing Channels for Manufactured Products. Ed. Richard M. Clewett. Homewood, IL: Irwin, 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Erin, Leonard M. Lodish, and Barton A. Weitz. 1987. “Resource Allocation Behavior in Conventional Channels.”Journal of Marketing Research 24 (February): 85–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Erin and Barton A. Weitz. 1989. “Determinants of Continuity in Conventional Industrial Channel Dyads.”Marketing Science 8 (Fall): 310–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Erin and Barton A. Weitz. 1992. “The Use of Pledges to Build and Sustain Commitment in Distribution Channels.”Journal of Marketing Research 29 (February): 18–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, James C. and James A. Narus. 1990. “A Model of Distribution Firm and Manufacturer Firm Working Partnerships.”Journal of Marketing 54 (January): 42–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arndt, Johan. 1979. “Toward a Concept of Domesticated Markets.”Journal of Marketing 43 (Fall): 69–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1983. “The Political Economy Paradigm: Foundation for Theory Building in Marketing.”Journal of Marketing 47 (Fall): 44–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aspinwall, Leo. 1958. “The Characteristics of Goods and Parallel Systems Theories.” InManagerial Marketing. Eds. Eugene Kelly and William Lazer. Homewood, IL: Irwin, 434–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandyopadhyay, Soumava and Robert A. Robicheaux. 1993. “Differences in Interfirm Communications in the United States and India: The Effect of Relationship Marketing.” InProceedings. AMA Summer Educators’ Conference. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 214–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, Leonard L. 1983. “Relationship Marketing.” InEmerging Perspectives on Services Marketing. Eds. Leonard Berry, G. Lynn Shostack, and Gregg D. Upah. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 25–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, Brett, Robert F. Dwyer, Robert A. Robicheaux, and James T. Simpson. 1992. “Influence Strategies in Marketing Channels: Measures and Use in Different Relationship Structures.”Journal of Marketing Research 29 (November): 462–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradach, Jeffrey and Robert C. Eccles. 1989. “Price, Authority, and Trust: From Ideal Types to Plural Forms.”Annual Review of Sociology 15: 97–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, James R. 1981. “A Cross-Channel Comparison of Supplier-Retailer Relations.”Journal of Retailing 57 (Winter): 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucklin, Louis P. 1966.A Theory of Distribution Channel Structure. Berkeley, CA: IBER Special Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— 1967. “Postponement, Speculation and the Structure of Distribution Channels.” InThe Marketing Channel: A Conceptual Viewpoint. Ed. Bruce E. Mallen. New York: Wiley, 67–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— 1972.Competition and Evolution in the Distributive Trades. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Fred E. 1937.Principles of Marketing. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, Ronald H. 1937. “The Nature of the Firm.”Economica 4 (November): 386–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, F. Robert and Sejo Oh. 1987. “Output Sector Munificence Effects on the Internal Political Economy of Marketing Channels.”Journal of Marketing Research 24 (November): 347–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, F. Robert and Sejo Oh. 1988. “A Transaction Cost Perspective on Vertical Contractual Structure and Interchannel Competitive Strategies.”Journal of Marketing 52 (April): 21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, F. Robert, Paul H. Schurr, and Sejo Oh. 1987. “Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships.”Journal of Marketing 51 (April): 11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, F. Robert and M. Ann Welsh. 1985. “Environmental Relationships of the Internal Political Economy of Marketing Channels.”Journal of Marketing Research 22 (November): 397–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, Richard M. 1962. “Power-Dependence Relations.”American Sociological Review 27 (February): 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etgar, Michael. 1976. “Effects of Administrative Control on Efficiency of Vertical Marketing Systems.”Journal of Marketing Research 13 (February): 12–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, Gary L. 1983. “On the Measurement of Interfirm Power in Channels of Distribution.”Journal of Marketing Research 20 (May): 158–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————— 1986. “On the Theory of Distribution Channel Structure.” InProceedings. 12th Paul D. Converse Symposium. Eds. D. Sudharshan and Frederick W. Webster. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 138–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, Gary L. and Raymond C. Roddy. 1991. “The Use of Influence Strategies in Interfirm Relationships in Industrial Product Strategies.”Journal of Marketing 55 (January): 52–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, Gary L. and John O. Summers. 1984. “Interfirm Influence Strategies and Their Application within Distribution Channels.”Journal of Marketing 48 (Summer): 43–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, Mark. 1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.”American Journal of Sociology 91 (November): 481–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronroos, Christian. 1990. “Relationship Approach to Marketing in Service Contexts: The Marketing and Organizational Behavior Interface.”Journal of Business Research 20 (January): 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heide, Jan B. and George John. 1988. “The Role of Dependence Balancing in Safeguarding Transaction-specific Assets in Conventional Channels.”Journal of Marketing 52 (January): 20–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heide, Jan B. and George John. 1990. “Alliances in Industrial Purchasing: The Determinants of Joint Action in Buyer-Supplier Relationships.”Journal of Marketing Research 27 (February): 24–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarillo, J. Carlos. 1988. “On Strategic Networks.”Strategic Management Journal 9 (January–February): 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, George. 1984. “An Empirical Investigation of Some Antecedents of Opportunism in a Marketing Channel.”Journal of Marketing Research 21 (August): 278–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, George and Torger Reve. 1982. “The Reliability and Validity of Key Informant Data from Dyadic Relationships in Marketing Channels.”Journal of Marketing Research 19 (January): 517–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, Patrick J. and Rajiv P. Dant. 1992. “The Dimensions of Commercial Exchange.”Marketing Letters 3 (May): 175–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, Patrick J. and Louis W. Stern. 1988. “Relational Exchange Norms, Perceptions of Unfairness, and Retained Hostility in Commercial Litigation.”Journal of Conflict Resolution 32 (September): 534–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keith, Janet E., Donald W. Jackson, Jr., and Lawrence A. Crosby. 1990. “Effects of Alternative Types of Influence Strategies under Different Channel Dependence Structures.”Journal of Marketing 54 (July): 30–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Saul, Gary L. Frazier, and Victor J. Roth. 1990. “A Transaction Cost Analysis Model of Channel Integration in International Markets.”Journal of Marketing Research 27 (May): 196–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, Nirmalya, Louis W. Stern, and Ravi S. Achrol. 1992. “Assessing Reseller Performance from the Perspective of the Supplier.”Journal of Marketing Research 29 (May): 238–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lusch, Robert F., Stephen W. Brown, and Gary J. Brunswick. 1992. “A General Framework for Explaining Internal vs. External Exchange.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 20 (Spring): 119–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macauley, Stewart. 1963. “Non-contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study.”American Sociological Review 28 (February): 55–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macneil, Ian R. 1980.The New Social Contract: An Inquiry into Modern Contractual Relations. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallen, Bruce E. 1973. “Functional Spinoff: A Key to Anticipating Change in Distribution Structure.”Journal of Marketing 37 (July): 18–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCammon, Bert C., Jr. 1970. “Perspectives for Distribution Programming.” InVertical Marketing Systems. Ed. Louis P. Bucklin. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman, 32–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, Raymond E. and Charles C. Snow. 1984. “Fit, Failure and the Hall of Fame.”California Management Review 26 (Spring): 10–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, Jakki and John R. Nevin. 1990. “Communication Strategies in Marketing Channels: A Theoretical Perspective.”Journal of Marketing 54 (October): 36–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noordewier, Thomas G., George John, and John R. Nevin. 1990. “Performance Outcomes of Purchasing Arrangements in Industrial Buyer-Vendor Relationships.”Journal of Marketing 54 (October): 80–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, William G. 1980 “Markets, Bureaucracies, and Clans.”Administrative Science Quarterly 24 (March): 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Michael E. 1985.Competitive Advantage. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reve, Torger and Louis W. Stern. 1986. “The Relationship between Interorganizational Form, Transaction Climate, and Economic Performance in Vertical Interfirm Dyads.” InMarketing Channels: Relationships and Performance. Eds. Luca Pellegrini and Srinivas K. Reddy. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 75–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robicheaux, Robert A. and Adel I. El-Ansary. 1976–1977. “A General Model for Understanding Channel Member Behavior.”Journal of Retailing 52 (Winter): 13–30, 93–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbloom, Bert. 1991.Marketing Channels: A Management View. Chicago: Dryden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanzoni, John. 1979. “Social Exchange and Behavioral Interdependence.” InSocial Exchange in Developing Relationships. Eds. Robert L. Burgess and Ted L. Huston. New York: Academic Press, 75–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, Arun and Luis V. Dominguez. 1992. “Channel Evolution: A Framework for Analysis.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 20 (Winter): 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, James T. 1990. “An Empirical Investigation of the Impact of Governance Structure on the Use of Influence Strategies in Distribution Channels: A Transaction-Cost Approach.” Dissertation. University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, Charles C. 1970. “Marketing Channel Coordination and Economic Development.” InVertical Marketing Systems. Ed. Louis Bucklin. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman, 135–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spriggs, Mark T. and John R. Nevin. 1992. “A Relational Contracting Framework for Understanding Exchange Relationships.” Working Paper. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, Louis W. and Jay W. Brown. 1969. “Distribution Channels: A Social Systems Approach.” InDistribution Channels: Behavioral Dimensions. Ed. Louis W. Stern. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, Louis W. and Adel I. El-Ansary. 1992.Marketing Channels. Fourth Edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, Louis W. and Torger Reve. 1980. “Distribution Channels as Political Economies: A Framework for Comparative Analysis.”Journal of Marketing 44 (Summer): 52–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, George J. 1951. “The Division of Labor Is Limited by the Extent of the Market.”Journal of Political Economy 59 (June): 185–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorelli, Hans B. 1986. “Networks: Between Markets and Hierarchies.”Strategic Management Journal 7 (January–February): 37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, David and Jay B. Barney. 1984. “Perspectives in Organizations: Resource Dependence, Efficiency, and Population.”Academy of Management Review 9 (July): 471–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaile, Roland S., Ewald T. Grether, and Reavis Cox. 1952.Marketing in the American Economy. New York: Ronald Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, Roland L. 1967. “The Interorganization Field as a Focus for Investigation.”Administrative Science Quarterly 12 (December): 398–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, Alan L. and William G. Ouchi. 1983. “Efficient Cultures: Exploring the Relationship between Culture and Organizational Performance.”Administrative Science Quarterly 28 (September): 468–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Oliver. 1975.Markets and Hierarchies. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1979. “Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations.”Journal of Law and Economics 22 (October): 3–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1985.The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zald, Mayer. 1970. “Political Economy: A Framework for Comparative Analysis.” InPower in Organizations. Ed. Mayer Zald. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press, 221–261.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

He received his Ph.D. in marketing from Louisiana State University. He has published in the areas of marketing channels, retailing, and logistics. His work has appeared in theJournal of Marketing Research, Journal of Marketing, Journal of Retailing, Journal of Business Research, Journal of Marketing Channels, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Materials Management, Journal of Marketing Education, and others.

He served as the managing director of public relations with the Federal Express Corporation before entering the Ph.D. program at Alabama. He holds a B.B.A. in accountancy from the University of Mississippi and an M.A. in marketing from the University of Alabama.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Robicheaux, R.A., Coleman, J.E. The structure of marketing channel relationships. JAMS 22, 38–51 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070394221004

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070394221004

Keywords

Navigation