Skip to main content
Log in

How does financial performance affect marketing? Studying the marketing-finance relationship from a dynamic perspective

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, the authors provide a dynamic framework for understanding the relationship between marketing and financial performance. They suggest that firms market to financial markets as well as to consumption markets and that some mixture provides superior long-term performance. The authors discuss the potential pitfalls of overemphasizing one market to the detriment of another and then provide a theoretical model of the factors that influence the extent of marketing to financial markets. This is followed by a discussion of implications for theory, practice, and future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agle, Bradley R., Ronald K. Mitchell, and Jeffrey A. Sonnenfeld. 1999. “Who Matters to CEOs? An Investigation of Stakeholder Attributes and Salience.”Academy of Management Journal 42 (5): 507–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, Jagdish and Wagner Kamakura. 1995. “The Economic Worth of Celebrity Endorsers: An Event Study Analysis.”Journal of Marketing 59 (2): 56–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amir, Eli and Baruch Lev. 1996. “Value-Relevance of Nonfinancial Information: The Wireless Communication Industry.”Journal of Accounting and Economics 22 (1–3): 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous. 1989. “Investor Relations: The Best and the Brightest.”Institutional Investor 23 (9): 58–67.

  • Ball, Ray and Phillip Brown. 1968. “An Empirical Evaluation of Accounting Income Numbers,”Journal of Accounting Research 6 (Autumn): 159–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, Jay B. 1986. “Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy.”Management Science 32 (10): 1231–1241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartels, Robert. 1970. “The Identity Crisis in Marketing.”Journal of Marketing 38 (4): 74–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, Stephen, Lee Seok Hwang, and Steven Lilien. 2000. “CEO Stock-Based Compensation: An Empirical Analysis of Incentive-Intensity, Relative Mix, and Economic Determinants.”Journal of Business 73 (4): 661–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, George and Liam Fahey. 1988. “Valuing Market Strategies.”Journal of Marketing 52 (3): 45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, Peter R. 1992. “Toward a General Theory of Competitive Rationality.”Journal of Marketing 56 (1): 69–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1996. “The Static and Dynamic Mechanics of Competition: A Comment on Hunt and Morgan’s Comparative Advantage Theory.rdJournal of Marketing 60 (4): 102–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, Paul W. Farris, and Willem J. M. I. Verbeke. 2001. “Dynamic Strategic Thinking.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 29 (3): 216–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, Robert G., Robert H. Herz, E. Mary Keegan, and David M. H. Phillips. 2001.The Value Reporting Revolution. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, Marc J. and Bill Birchard. 2000.Counting What Counts: Turning Corporate Accountability to Competitive Advantage. Reading, MA: Perseus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, Eugene F. and Kenneth R. French. 1992. “The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns.”Journal of Finance 47 (2): 427–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladwell, Malcolm. 2000.The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, Roger C, Jr. and Kristina D. Frankenberger. 2000. “The Contribution of Changes in Advertising Expenditures to Earnings and Market Values.”Journal of Business Research 50 (2): 149–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, Sunil, Donald R. Lehmann, and Jennifer Ames Stuart. 2004. “Valuing Customers.”Journal of Marketing Research 41 (1): 7–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haugen, Robert A. 1999.The Inefficient Stock Market. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, James W. 1988.Obtaining Venture Financing. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, Shelby D. 1991.Modern Marketing Theory. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Robert M. Morgan. 1996. “The Resource-Advantage Theory of Competition: Dynamics, Path Dependencies, and Evolutionary Dimensions.”Journal of Marketing 60 (4): 107–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ittner, Christopher and David Larcker. 1998. “Innovations in Performance Management: Trends and Research Implications.”Journal of Management Accounting Research 10: 205–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. and D. Norton. 1992. “The Balanced Scorecard—Measures That Drive Performance.”Harvard Business Review 10: 71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, Ajay K. and Bernard J. Jaworski. 1990. “Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implication.”Journal of Marketing 54 (2): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luck, David J. 1969. “Broadening the Concept of Marketing Too Far.”Journal of Marketing 33 (3): 53–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukas, Bryan A. and O. C. Ferrell. 2000. “The Effect of Market Orientation on Product Innovation.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 28 (2): 239–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathur, Lynette Knowles and Ike Mathur. 2000. “An Analysis of the Wealth Effects of Green Marketing Strategies.”Journal of Business Research 50 (2): 193–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathur, Lynette Knowles and Ike Mathur. 2000. “An Analysis of the Wealth Effects of Green Marketing Strategies.”Journal of Business Research 50 (2): 193–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Merton and Kevin Rock. 1985. “Dividend Policy Under Asymmetric Information.”Journal of Finance 40 (4): 1031–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Ronald K., Bradley R. Agle, and Donna J. Wood. 1997. “Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts.”Academy of Management Review 22 (4): 853–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mizik, Natalie and Robert Jacobson. 2003. “Trading Off Between Value Creation and Value Appropriation: The Financial Implications of Shifts in Strategic Emphasis.”Journal of Marketing 67 (1): 411 -433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayanan, Sridhar, Ramarao Desiraju. and Pradeep K. Chintagunta. 2004. “Return on Investment Implications for Pharmaceutical Promotional Expenditures: The Role of Marketing-Mix Interactions.”Journal of Marketing 68 (4): 90–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neville, Benjamin A., Simon J. Bell, and Gregory Whitwell. 2004. “Stakeholder Salience Revisited: Toward an Actionable Tool for the Management of Stakeholders.”Academy of Management Proceedings 64: D1-D6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauwels, Koen, Jorge Silva-Risso, Shuba Srinivasan, and Dominique M. Hanssens. 2004. “New Products, Sales Promotions, and Firm Value: The Case of the Automobile Industry.”Journal of Marketing 68 (4): 42–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rust, Roland T, Tim Ambler, Gregory S. Carpenter, V. Kumar, and Rajendra K. Srivastava. 2004. “Measuring Marketing Productivity: Current Knowledge and Future Directions.”Journal of Marketing 68 (4): 76–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, Harley E., Jr. and Roy A. Wiggins III. 2002. “The Interactions Between R&D Investment Decisions and Compensation Policy.”Financial Management 31 (1): 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spirrison, J. Bradley. 1999. “Webvan Financing Brings Web Grocers Home.”Private Equity Week 6 (31): 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, Rajendra, Tasadduq A. Shervani, and Liam Fahey. 1998. “Market-Based Assets and Shareholder Value: A Framework for Analysis.”Journal of Marketing 62 (1): 2–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——, and — 1999. “Marketing, Business Processes, and Shareholder Value: An Organizationally Embedded View of Marketing Activities and the Discipline of Marketing.”Journal of Marketing 63 (Special Issue): 168–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tam, Pui-Wing. 2001. “Pilot Error: How Palm Tumbled From Star of Tech to Target of Microsoft.”Wall Street Journal, September 7, p. Al.

  • Warner, Melanie. 2001. “Can Amazon Be Saved?”Fortune 144 (11): 156–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. 1947.The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B. 1984. “A Resource-Based View of the Firm.”Strategic Management Journal 5 (2): 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, David. 2002. “Making a Drama Out of a Crisis.”Director 55 (10): 58–63.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Mitchell J. Lovett (mitchell.lovett@duke.edu) is a Ph.D. student in the Fuqua School of Business at Duke University. His current research interests include consumer and seller learning in dynamic environments, competitive and dynamic marketing strategies, and the role of marketing in innovation.

Jason B. MacDonald (jmacdona@boisestate.edu) is an associate professor of marketing in the College of Business and Economics at Boise State University. His current research interests include the role of marketing in investor relations and Internet marketing strategy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lovett, M.J., MacDonald, J.B. How does financial performance affect marketing? Studying the marketing-finance relationship from a dynamic perspective. JAMS 33, 476–485 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070305277382

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070305277382

Keywords

Navigation