The role of brand personality in charitable giving: An assessment and validation

  • Beverly T. Venable
  • Gregory M. Rose
  • Victoria D. Bush
  • Faye W. Gilbert
Article

Abstract

Marketing concepts such as corporate identity, image, and branding are important strategies for nonprofit organizations. In particular, brand personality has been advocated by practitioners but has not been empirically investigated in the nonprofit context. According to social exchange theory and trust, the authors argue that nonprofit stakeholders perceive nonprofit organizations at an abstract level because of the organizations’ intangibility and social ideals. This study develops and refines a parsimonious measure of brand personality specifically for the nonprofit context. The authors conduct a series of six multimethod studies of nonprofit stakeholders to validate the role of brand personality in nonprofit organizations. The results yield four dimensions of brand personality for nonprofits: integrity, nurturance, sophistication, and ruggedness. Thus, current and potential donors ascribe personality traits to nonprofit organizations and differentiate between nonprofits on the basis of the organizations’ personality. Finally, nonprofit brand personality may influence potential donors’ likelihood to contribute.

Keywords

nonprofit marketing brand personality measurement social exchange charitable giving 

References

  1. Aaker, David A. 1991.Managing Brand Equity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aaker, Jennifer L. 1997. “Dimensions of Brand Personality.”Journal of Marketing Research 19 (August): 347–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. —. 1999. “The Malleable Self: The Role of Self-Expression in Persuasion.”Journal of Marketing Research 36 (February): 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. —. 2000. “Accessibility or Diagnosticity? Disentangling the Influence of Culture on Persuasion Processes and Attitudes.”Journal of Consumer Research 26 (March): 340–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. —, Vericona Benet-Martinez, and Jordi Garolera. 2001. “Consumption Symbols as Carriers of Culture: A Study of Japanese and Spanish Brand Personality Constructs.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81 (3): 492–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. American Association of Fundraising Council. 2001.Giving USA: The Annual Report on Philanthropy. Indianapolis, IN: American Association of Fundraising Council.Google Scholar
  7. Anderson, D. W. and J. C. Gerbing. 1988. “An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment.”Journal of Marketing Research 25 (May): 186–192.Google Scholar
  8. Arnett, Dennis B., Steve D. German, and Shelby D. Hunt. 2003. “The Identity Salience Model of Relationship Marketing Success: The Case of Nonprofit Marketing.”Journal of Marketing 67 (2): 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Arnould, Eric, Linda Price, and George Zinkhan. 2004.Consumers. 2d ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.Google Scholar
  10. Bagozzi, Richard P. 1975. “Marketing as Exchange.”Journal of Marketing 39 (October): 32–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bendapudi, N., S. N. Singh, and V. Bendapudi. 1996. “Enhancing Helping Behavior: An Integrative Framework for Promotion Planning.”Journal of Marketing 60 (July): 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Berry, Leonard. 2000. “Cultivating Service Brand Equity.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 28 (1): 128–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. — and A. Parasuraman. 1991.Marketing Services. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  14. Blau, Peter M. 1964.Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Bollen, K. 1989.Structural Equations With Latent Variables. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Boris, Elizabeth T. 1999. “Nonprofit Organizations in a Democracy: Varied Roles and Responsibilities.” InNonprofit and Government. Eds. Elizabeth T. Boris and Eugene Steuerle. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press, 1–12.Google Scholar
  17. Blum, D. E. 2002. “Ties That Bind.”The Chronicle of Philanthropy 14 (11): 7–10.Google Scholar
  18. Burnett, J. J. 1981. “Psychographic and Demographic Characteristics of Blood Donors.”Journal of Consumer Research 8 (June): 62–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. — and V. R. Wood. 1988. “A Proposed Model of the Donation Decision Process.”Research in Consumer Behavior 3:1–47.Google Scholar
  20. Burnett, K. 2002.Relationship Fundraising: A Donor Based Approach to the Business of Raising Money. 2d ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  21. Cermak, D. S. P., K. M. File, and R. A. Prince. 1994. “A Benefit Segmentation of the Major Donor Market.”Journal of Business Research 29:121–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Churchill, G. 1979. “A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs.”Journal of Marketing Research 16 (February): 46–73.Google Scholar
  23. Dixon, M. 1997. “Small and Medium Sized Charities Need a Strong Brand Too: Crisis Experience.”Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 2 (1): 52–57.Google Scholar
  24. Doney, Patricia M. and Joseph P. Cannon. 1997. “An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer-Seller Relationships.Journal of Marketing 61 (2): 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dwyer, F. Robert, Paul H. Schurr, and Sejo Oh. 1987. “Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships.”Journal of Marketing 51 (April): 11–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ferrandi, J. M., P. Valette-Florence, and S. Fine-Falcy. 2000. “Aaker’s Brand Personality Scale in a French Context: A Replication and a Preliminary Test of Its Validity.” InProceedings of Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 23. Ed. Charles H. Noble, 7–13.Google Scholar
  27. Fornell, Claes and David F. Larker. 1981. “Evaluating Structural Equation Models With Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error.”Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1): 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Grounds, J. and J. Harkness. 1998. “Developing a Brand From Within: Involving Employees and Volunteers When Developing a New Brand Position.”Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 3 (2): 179–184.Google Scholar
  29. Hair, J., R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham, and W. C. Black. 1998.Multivariate Data Analysis. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  30. Harvey, J. H. 1990. “Benefit Segmentation for Fund Raisers.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 18 (1): 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hawks, J. K. 1997. “Charity American Style.” InFor a Good Cause? How Charitable Institutions Become Powerful Economic Bullies. Secaucus, NJ: Carol Publishing Group, 3–13.Google Scholar
  32. Homans, George C. 1958. “Social Behavior and Exchange.”American Journal of Sociology 63 (May): 597–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. John, O. P. 1990. “The ‘Big Five’ Factor Taxonomy: Dimensions of Personality in Natural Language and in Questionnaires.” InHandbook of Personality: Theory and Research. Ed. L. A. Pervin. New York: Guilford, 66–100.Google Scholar
  34. Johnson, Madeline and George M. Zinkhan. 1990. “Defining and Measuring Company Image.” InAdvances in Consumer Research, Vol. 17. Eds. M. Goldberg, G. Gorn, and R. W. Polly. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 110–119.Google Scholar
  35. Jones, Jeff. 2002. “Nonprofit Times Top 100.”The Nonprofit Times, November 1, pp. 30–37.Google Scholar
  36. Kotler, P. and S. J. Levy. 1969. “Broadening the Concept of Marketing.”Journal of Marketing 33 (1): 10–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Marchetti, Domenica. 2003. “The Young and the Generous.”The Chronicle of Philanthropy, January 9, pp. 7–23.Google Scholar
  38. McCrae, R. and Paul T. Costa. 1989. “The Structure of Interpersonal Traits: Wiggins’s Circumplex and Five-Factor Model.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56 (4): 586–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mindak, William A. and Malcolm H. Bybee. 1971. “Marketing’s Application to Fundraising.”Journal of Marketing 35 (3): 13–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Moorman, C., R. Deshpande, and G. Zaltman. 1993. “Factors Affecting Trust in Market Research Relationships.”Journal of Marketing 57 (January): 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Morgan, Robert M. and Shelby D. Hunt. 1994. “The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing.”Journal of Marketing 58 (3): 20–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Morley, E., E. Vinson, and H. P. Hatry. 2001. “Outcome Measurement in Nonprofit Organizations: Current Practices and Recommendations.” InIndependent Sector. Washington, DC: Urban Institute, 5–10.Google Scholar
  43. Nichols, J. E. 1991.Targeted Fund Raising. Chicago: Precept Press.Google Scholar
  44. —. 1995. “Developing Relationships With Donors.”Fund Raising Management 26 (6): 18–47.Google Scholar
  45. Norman, Warren T. 1963. “Toward an Adequate Taxonomy of Personality Attribute: Replicated Factor Structure in Peer Nomination Personality Ratings.”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 66: 574–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nucifora, Alf. 1998. “Smart Not-for-Profits Learn the Marketing Ropes.”Business News 11 (18): 17.Google Scholar
  47. Nunnally, Jum. 1979.Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  48. O’Shaughnessy, J. A. and N. J. O’Shaughnessy. 2000. “Treating the Nation as a Brand: Some Neglected Issues.”Journal of Macromarketing 20 (1): 56–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Peltier, James, John Schibrowsky, and Don Schultz. 2002. “Leveraging Customer Information to Develop Sequential Communication Strategies: A Case Study of Charitable-Giving Behavior.”Journal of Advertising Research 42 (July/August): 23–41.Google Scholar
  50. Sargeant, Adrian. 1999. “Charitable Giving: Towards a Model of Donor Behaviour.”Journal of Marketing Management 15: 215–238.Google Scholar
  51. Smith, J. Brock and Donald W. Barclay. 1997. “The Effects of Organizational Differences and Trust on the Effectiveness of Selling Partner Relationships.”Journal of Marketing 61 (1): 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stern, Barbara, George M. Zinkhan, and Anupam Jaju. 2001. “Marketing Images: Construct Definition, Measurement Issues, and Theory Development.”Marketing Theory 1 (2): 201–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tapp, A. 1996. “Charity Brands: A Qualitative Study of Current Practice.”Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 1 (4): 327–336.Google Scholar
  54. Tupes, Ernest C. and Raymond E. Christal. 1958. “Stability of Personality Trait Rating Factors Obtained Under Diverse Conditions.” USAF WADS Technical Report No. 58-61, U.S. Air Force, Lackland Air Force Base, TX.Google Scholar
  55. Urban Institute. 2002.National Center for Charitable Statistics. Retrieved from http://nccsdataweb.urban.org/FAQ/index. php?category=73Google Scholar
  56. Webb, D. J., C. L. Green, and T. G. Brashear. 2000. “Development and Validation of Scales to Measure Attitudes Influencing Monetary Donations to Charitable Organizations.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 28 (2): 299–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Weitzman, Murray S. and Nadine T. Jalandoni. 2001.The Nonprofit Almanac and Desk Reference (2001), Independent Sector. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  58. Wispe, L. 1978.Integrity, Sympathy and Helping. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  59. Wray, R. B. 1994. “Branding, Product Development and Positioning the Charity.”Journal of Brand Management 1 (6): 363–370.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Beverly T. Venable
    • 1
  • Gregory M. Rose
    • 2
  • Victoria D. Bush
    • 3
  • Faye W. Gilbert
    • 4
  1. 1.Columbus State UniversityColumbusUSA
  2. 2.University of WashingtonTacoma
  3. 3.University of MississippiUSA
  4. 4.Georgia College & State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations