Skip to main content

Firm-to-firm and interpersonal relationships: Perspectives from advertising agency account managers

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science volume 32, pages 312–328 (2004)Cite this article

Abstract

We do things for people we like, our friends. However, in firm-to-firm exchange relationships, boundary spanners are economic agents representing their firms contractually to achieve specific goals. Thus, questions arise as to whether close interpersonal relationships exist in business settings, how they are defined, and whether they influence the nature and functioning of interfirm exchange. A qualitative study with advertising agency account managers finds that analyzing interpersonal relationships across groups from both sides defines firm-to-firm relationships. Participants define these relationships based on the extent to which the agency is involved in the client’s business across categories including vendor, partner, and surrogate manager. Interpersonal relationship exist across categories including strictly business, business friends, and highly personal. The relationships are distinguished based on the knowledge base developed about the brand manager. Overwhelmingly, the participants claim that devoloping close, interpersonal relationships is beneficial to both their professional and personal lives.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (Canada)

References

  • Altman, I. 1973. “Reciprocity of Interpersonal Exchange.”Journal of the Theory of Social Behavior 3: 249–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Erin, Leonard M. Lodish, and Barton A. Weitz. 1987. “Resource Allocation Behavior in Conventional Channels.”Journal of Marketing Research 24 (February): 85–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, Leonard L. 1995. “Relationship Marketing of Services—Growing Interest, Emerging Perspectives.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 23 (Fall): 236–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitner, Mary Jo. 1995. “Building Service Relationships: It’s All About Promises.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 23 (Fall): 246–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, Margaret Henderson. 1995. “Measure for Measure, Advertising’s Eluded Total Quality Management Model.”Brandweek (June 19): 17.

  • Bolton, Ruth N., Amy K. Smith, and Janet Wagner. 2003. “Striking the Right Balance: Designing Service to Enhance Business-to-Business Relationships.”Journal of Service Research 5 (May): 271–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, Lawrence A., Kenneth R. Evans, and Deborah Cowles. 1990. “Relationship Quality in Services Selling: An Interpersonal Influence Perspective.”Journal of Marketing 54 (July): 68–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, George S. 2000. “Managing Market Relationships.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 28 (Winter): 24–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, F. Robert, Paul H. Schurr, and Sejo Oh. 1987. “Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships.”Journal of Marketing 51 (April): 11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Derek and Jonathan Potter. 1992.Discursive Psychology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, Gary L. 1983. “On the Measurement of Inter-Firm Power in Channels of Distribution.”Journal of Marketing 20 (May): 158–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frenzen, Jonathan K. and Harry L. Davis. 1990. “Purchasing Behavior in Embedded Markets.”Journal of Consumer Research 17 (June): 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, Mark. 1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.”American Journal of Sociology 91 (November): 481–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutt, Michael D. and Edwin R. Stafford. 2000. “Defining the Social Network of a Strategic Alliance.”Sloan Management Review 41 (2): 51–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Barbara Bund. 1985.Winning and Keeping Industrial Customers. Lexington, KY: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keep, William W., Stanley C. Hollander, and Roger Dickinson. 1998. “Forces Impinging on Long-Term Business-to-Business Relationships in the United States: A Historical Perspective.”Journal of Marketing 62 (April): 31–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, Nirmalya. 1996. “The Power of Trust in Manufacturer-Retailer Relationships.”Harvard Business Review 74 (6): 92–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, Andrea. 1992. “Network Dyads in Entrepreneurial Settings: A Study of the Governance of Exchange Relationship.”Administrative Science Quarterly 37: 76–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Yvonna S. and Egon G. Guba. 1985.Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, Grant. 1988.The Long Interview. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michell, Paul C., Harold Cataquet, and Stephan Hague. 1992. “Establishing the Causes of Disaffection in Agency-Client Relations.”Journal of Advertising Research 32 (2): 41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, Jakki and John R. Nevin. 1990. “Communication Strategies in Marketing Channels: A Theoretical Perspective.”Journal of Marketing 54 (October): 36–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, James D. 1998. “Toward a Role-Theoretic Conception of Embeddedness.”American Journal of Sociology 104 (July): 95–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, Christine, Gerald Zaltman, and Rohit Deshpande. 1992. “Relationships Between Providers and Users of Market Research: The Dynamics of Trust Within and Between Organizations.”Journal of Marketing Research 29 (August): 314–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Robert M. and Shelby D. Hunt. 1994. “The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing.”Journal of Marketing 58 (July): 20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murry, John P., Jr. and Jan B. Heide. 1998. “Managing Promotion Program Participation Within Manufacturer-Retailer Relationships.”Journal of Marketing 62 (January): 58–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, Carolyn, Larry D. Compeau, and Rajesh Sethi. 2001. “The Role of Interpersonal Liking in Building Trust in Long-Term Channel Relationships.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 29 (Winter): 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, Richard N. and John Hagedoorn. 1997. “The Institutionalization and Evolutionary Dynamics of Inter-Organizational Alliances and Networks.”Academy of Management Journal 40 (2): 261–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A., Leonard L. Berry, and Valarie A. Zeithaml. 1991. “Refinement and Reassessment of the SERVQUAL Scale.”Journal of Retailing 67 (Winter): 420–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, Jonathan. 1996.Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, Linda L. and Eric J. Arnold. 1999. “Commercial Friendships: Service Provider-Client Relationships in Context.”Journal of Marketing 63 (October): 38–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, Jagdish N. and Atul Parvatiyar. 1995. “Relationship Marketing in Consumer Markets: Antecedents and Consequences.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 23 (Fall): 255–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, Jagdip (1993). “Boundary Role Ambiguity: Facets, Determinants and Impacts.”Journal of Marketing 57 (April): 11–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, Jerry R. Goolsby, and Gary K. Rhoads. 1994. “Behavioral and Psychological Consequences of Boundary Spanning Burnout for Customer Service Representatives.”Journal of Marketing Research 31 (November): 558–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Craig J. 1997. “Interpreting Consumers: A Hermeneutical Framework for Deriving Marketing Insights From the Texts of Consumers’ Consumption Stories.”Journal of Marketing Research 34 (November): 438–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and Diana L. Haytko. 1997. “Speaking of Fashion: Consumers’ Uses of Fashion Discourses and the Appropriation of Countervailing Cultural Meanings.”Journal of Consumer Research 24 (June): 15–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, William B. Locander, and Howard R. Pollio. 1989. “Putting Consumer Experience Back Into Consumer Research: The Philosophy and Method of Existential-Phenomenology.”Journal of Consumer Research 16 (September): 133–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallendorf, Melanie and Russell W. Belk. 1989. “Assessing Trustworthiness in Naturalistic Consumer Research.” InInterpretive Consumer Research. Ed. Elizabeth C. Hirschman. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 69–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, Frederick E. Jr. 2000. “Understanding the Relationships Among Brands, Consumers, and Resellers.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 28 (Winter): 17–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Allen M. and Erin Anderson. 1992. “Converting From Independent to Employee Salesforces: The Role of Perceived Switching Costs.”Journal of Marketing Research 29 (February): 101–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitz, Barton A. and Sandy D. Jap. 1995. “Relationship Marketing and Distribution Channels.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 23 (Fall): 305–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Oliver E. 1975.Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1996.The Mechanisms of Governance. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Workman, John P., Christian Homburg, and Ove Jensen 2003. “Intraorganizational Determinants of Key Account Management Effectiveness.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 31 (Winter): 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi, Toshio and Midori Yamagishi. 1994. “Trust and Commitment in the United States and Japan.”Motivation and Emotion 18 (2): 129–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zinkhan, George M. 2002. “Relationship Marketing: Theory and Implementation.”Journal of Market-Focused Management 5: 83–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Southwest Missouri State University, Missouri, USA

    Diana L. Haytko

Authors
  1. Diana L. Haytko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Diana L. Haytko (DianaHaytko@smsu.edu) is an associate professor of marketing at Southwest Missouri State University. She received a B.S. in advertising from the University of Colorado, an M.S. in advertising from the University of Illinois, and an M.B.A. and Ph.D. in marketing from the University of Wisconsin. Her research interests are in the field of relationship marketing, both from a business-to-business and a consumer perspective. Her work has been published in theJournal of Consumer Research, theJournal of Retailing, theJournal of Marketing Communications, and theJournal of Shopping Center Research.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haytko, D.L. Firm-to-firm and interpersonal relationships: Perspectives from advertising agency account managers. JAMS 32, 312–328 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070304264989

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070304264989

Key words

  • relationship marketing
  • personal relationships
  • qualitative methods
  • business to business