Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Big R (versus little r) reviewers: The anonymous coauthor

  • Special Section Reflections on Research in Marketing and Reviewing for Scholarly Journals Invited Essays by JAMS 2000–2003 Outstanding Reviewer Award Recipients
  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Lee, A. 1995. “Reviewing a Manuscript for Publication”.Journal of Operations Management 13(1): 97–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, D. W. 2002. “Getting Published: Reflections of an Old Editor”.Journal of Marketing 66(October): 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summers, J. O. 2001. “Guidelines for Conducting Research and Publishing in Marketing: From Conceptualization Through the Review Process”.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 29(4): 405–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varadarajan, R. 1996. “From the Editor: Reflections on Research and Publishing”.Journal of Marketing 60(October): 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zmud, B. 1998. “A Personal Perspective on the State of Journal Refereeing”.MIS Quarterly 22(4): xiv-xiviii.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Queen's University, Kingston, Canada

    Shirley Taylor

Authors
  1. Shirley Taylor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taylor, S. Big R (versus little r) reviewers: The anonymous coauthor. JAMS 31, 341–343 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070303031003015

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070303031003015

Keywords

Search

Navigation