Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Achieving “reviewer readiness”

  • Special Section Reflections on Research in Marketing and Reviewing for Scholarly Journals Invited Essays by JAMS 2000–2003 Outstanding Reviewer Award Recipients
  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bailar, John C. 1991. “Reliability, Fairness, Objectivity and Other Inappropriate Goals in Peer Review”.Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1): 137–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitner, Mary Jo, Amy L. Ostrom, and Matthew L. Meuter. 2002. “Implementing Successful Self-Service Technologies”.Academy of Management Executive 16(4): 96–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blank, Hartmut. 2002. “Evaluating Reviews: A Possible Means for Quality Control and Reward Allocation in the Review Process”.Cortex 38: 408–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, David E. 1986. “Managing Customers as Human Resources in Service Organizations”.Human Resource Management 25(3): 371–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cicchetti, Dominic V. 1991. “The Reliability of Peer Review for Manuscript and Grant Submissions: A Cross-Disciplinary Investigation”.Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14(1): 119–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall, Rick. 1991. “What Should Be Done to Improve Reviewing?”Behavior and Brain Sciences 14(1): 143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, Edzard, T. Saradeth, and Karl-Ludwig Resch. 1993. “Drawbacks of Peer Review”.Nature 363: 296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, Robert H. and Suzanne W. Fletcher. 1997. “Evidence for the Effectiveness of Peer Review”.Science and Engineering Ethics 3(1): 35–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleser, Leon J. 1986. “Some Notes on Refereeing”.The American Statistician 40(4): 310–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, Scott A. and Reid Hastie. 1990. “Hindsight: Biased Judgments of Past Events After the Outcomes are Known”.Psychological Bulletin 107(3): 311–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, Morris B. 1986. “A Note on Sadomasochism in the Review Process: I Hate When That Happens”.Journal of Marketing 50(July): 104–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laband, David N. 1990. “Is There Value-Added From the Review Process in Economics?: Preliminary Evidence From Authors”.The Quarterly Journal of Economics 105(2): 341–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, John G., Jr. 1998. “Reviewing”.Advances in Consumer Research 25: 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markland, Robert E. 1989. “Musings of a Well-Traveled Editor”.Decision Sciences 20(4): vii-xiii.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, Benjamin and David E. Bowen. 1995.Winning the Service Game. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegelman, Stanley S. 1988. “Guidelines for Reviewers ofRadiology”.Radiology 166(2): 360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, John O. 2001. “Guidelines for Conducting Research and Publishing in Marketing: From Conceptualization Throough the Review Process”.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 29(4): 405–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vroom, Victor H. 1964.Work and Motivation. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller, Ann C. 2001.Editorial Peer Review: Its Strengths and Weaknesses. Medford, NJ: Information Today.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Arizona State University, Arizona, USA

    Amy L. Ostrom

Authors
  1. Amy L. Ostrom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ostrom, A.L. Achieving “reviewer readiness”. JAMS 31, 337–340 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070303031003014

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070303031003014

Keywords

Search

Navigation