Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A reviewer’s gold

  • Special Section Reflections on Research in Marketing and Reviewing for Scholarly Journals Invited Essays by JAMS 2000–2003 Outstanding Reviewer Award Recipients
  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Epstein, Seymour. 1995. “What Can Be Done to Improve the Journal Review Process?”American Psychologist 50 (10): 883–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, David. 2002. “Obligations and Obfuscations in the Review Process.”Academy of Management Journal 46 (6): 1079–1084.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, Morris. 1986. “A Note on Sadomasochism in the Review Process: I Hate When That Happens.”Journal of Marketing 50 (3): 104–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, Karl E. 2002. “Puzzles in Organizational Learning: An Exercise in Disciplined Imagination.”British Journal of Management 13: S7-S15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Peter. 2002. “Marketplace Metacognition and Social Intelligence.”Journal of Consumer Research 28 (March): 677–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, USA

    Jagdip Singh

Authors
  1. Jagdip Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singh, J. A reviewer’s gold. JAMS 31, 331–336 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070303031003013

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070303031003013

Keywords

Search

Navigation