Skip to main content
Log in

On the trait antecedents and outcomes of service worker job resourcefulness: A hierarchical model approach

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a series of three studies, a four-level hierarchical model of personality was employed to identify the antecedents and three validating criteria of a newly developed trait labeledjob resourcefulness (JR). JR is defined as an enduring disposition to garner scarce resources and overcome obstacles in pursuit of job-related goals. Across three service contexts, JR was shown to predict customer orientation, self-rated performance, and supervisor-rated performance. The results also revealed that the hierarchical model accounted for more variance in performance ratings than one version of the 5-Factor Model of personality. Results are discussed in terms of their implications for selecting high-performing service employees.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allport, G. W. 1961.Pattern and Growth in Personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. 1986. “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (6): 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrick, M. R. and M. K. Mount. 1991. “The Big Five Personality Dimensions and Job Performance: A Meta-Analysis.”Personnel Psychology 44 (1): 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, K. R. 1994. “Personality Screening in Employment.”American Business Law Journal 32 (1): 69–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, J. 1995a. “A Contrarian View of the 5-Factor Approach to Personality Description.”Psychological Bulletin 117 (2): 187–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1995b. “Going Beyond the Five Factors Given: Rejoinder to Costa and McCrae (1995) and Goldberg and Saucier (1995).”Psychological Bulletin 117 (2): 226–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, S. R. 1989. “The Optimal Level of Measurement for Personality Constructs.” InPersonality Psychology: Recent Trends and Emerging Directions. Eds. D. M. Buss and M. C. Cantor. New York: Springer-Verlag, 201–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1992. “Assessing the 5-Factor Model of Personality Description.”Journal of Personality 60: 253–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. P., W. L. Cron, and J. W. Slocum Jr. 1998. “Effects of Trait Competitiveness and Perceived Intraorganizational Competition on Saleperson Goal Setting and Performance.”Journal of Marketing 62 (October): 88–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. J. and A. Kirmani. 1999. “The Influence of Preencounter Affect on Satisfaction With an Anxiety-Provoking Service Encounter.”Journal of Service Research 1 (May): 333–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, J. C. Mowen, D. T. Donavan, and J. W. Licata. 2002. “The Customer Orientation of Service Workers: Personality Trait Influences on Self and Supervisor Performance Ratings.”Journal of Marketing Research 39 (February): 110–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burisch, M. 1997. “Test Length and Validity Revisited.”European Journal of Personality 11: 303–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. 1991. “Evolutionary Personality Psychology.”Annual Review of Psychology 42: 459–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S. and M. F. Scheier. 1990. “Origins and Functions of Positive and Negative Affect: A Control-Process View.”Psychological Review 97: 19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. and P. Cohen. 1975.Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T. and R. R. McCrae. 1992.Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO 5-Factor Inventory (NEO FFI) Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cran, D. J. 1994. “Towards Validation of the Service Orientation Construct.”The Services Industries Journal 14 (1): 34–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, D. V. and S. B. Silverman. 1989. “Personality and Job Performance: Evidence of Incremental Validity.”Personnel Psychology 42 (Spring): 25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. 1978. “Adoption of Fair Agencies of Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures.”Federal Register, Civil Service Commission, Department of Labor and Department of Justice, 38 (August): 290–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. R. 1990. “An Alternative ‘Description of Personality’: The Big Five Factor Structure.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59: 1216–1229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1993. “The Structure of Phenotypic Personality Traits.”American Psychologist 487: 26–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F. Jr., R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham, and W. C. Black. 1995.Multivariate Data Analysis With Readings. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, D. and G. Akehurst. 2000. “An Empirical Study of Service Quality Implementation.”The Service Industries Journal 20 (2): 133–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D. 1991.Modern Marketing Theory: Critical Issues in the Philosophy of Marketing Science. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurley, R. F. 1998. “Service Disposition and Personality: A Review and a Classification Scheme for Understanding Where Service Disposition Has an Effect on Customers.”Advances in Services Marketing and Management 7: 159–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., C. A. Higgins, C. J. Thoresen, and M. R. Barrick. 1999. “The Big Five Personality Traits, General Mental Ability, and Career Success Across the Life Span.”Personnel Psychology 52 (3): 621–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanungo, R. N. and S. Misra. 1992. “Managerial Resourcefulness: A Reconceptualization of Management Skills.”Human Relations 45 (12): 1311–1317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, A., T. A. Shervani, and G. N. Challagalla. 1998. “Learning and Performance Orientation of Salespeople: The Role of Supervisors.”Journal of Marketing Research 35 (May): 263–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, D. P. 1992. “The 5-Factor Model of Personality: A Critical Appraisal.”Journal of Personality Assement 60: 329–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R. and O. P. John 1992. “An Introduction to the 5-Factor Model and Its Applications.”Journal of Personality 60: 175–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaels R. E. and R. L. Day. 1985. “Measuring the Customer Orientation of Salespeople: A Replication With Industrial Buyers.”Journal of Marketing Research 22 (November): 443–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mount, M. K., L. A. Witt, and M. R. Barrick. 2000. “Incremental Validity of Empirically Keyed Biodata Scales Over GMA and the Five Factor Personality Constructs.”Personnel Psychology 53: 299–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowen, J. C. 2000.The 3M Model of Motivation and Personality: Theory and Empirical Application to Consumer Behavior. Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and N. Spears. 1999. “A Hierarchical Model Approach to Understanding Compulsive Buying Among College Students.”Journal of Consumer Psychology 8 (4): 407–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paunonen, S. V. 1998. “Hierarchical Organization of Personality and Prediction of Behavior.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74 (2): 538–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedhazur, E. J. 1982.Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research. New York: CBS College Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez, J. C. 2002. “EDS Clients Should Monitor Service Quality.” Retrieved September 27, 2002, from NetworkWorldFusion Web site, http://www.nwfusion.com/news.

  • Raymark, P. H., M. J. Schmit, and R. M. Guion. 1997. “Identifying Potentially Useful Personality Constructs for Employee Selection.”Personnel Psychology 50 (3): 723–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichheld, F. F. and W. E. Sasser Jr. 1990. “Zero Defections: Quality Comes to Services.”Harvard Business Review, September–October, pp. 105–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saucier, G. 1994. “Mini-Markers: A Brief Version of Goldberg's Unipolar Big Five Markers.”Journal of Personality Assessment 63 (3): 506–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxe, R. and B. A. Weitz. 1982. “The SOCO Scale: A Measure of the Customer Orientation of Salespeople.”Journal of Marketing Research 19 (August): 343–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, F. L. K. Law, J. E. Hunter, H. R. Rothstein, K. Pearlman, and M. McDaniel. 1993. “Refinements in Validity Generalization Methods: Implications for the Situational Specificity Hypothesis.”Journal of Applied Psychology 78 (1): 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B and D. E. Bowen. 1985. “Employee and Customer Perceptions of Service in Banks: Replication and Extension.”Journal of Applied Psychology 70: 423–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siguaw, J. A., G. Brown, and R. E. Widing II. 1994. “The Influence of the Market Orientation of the Firm on Sales Force Behavior and Attitudes.”Journal of Marketing Research 31 (February): 106–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sujan, H., B. A. Weitz, and N. Kumar. 1994. “Learning Orientation, Working Smart, and Effective Selling.”Journal of Marketing 58 (July): 39–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tett, R. P., D. J. Jackson, and M. Rothstein. 1991. “Personality Measures as Predictors of Job Performance: A Meta-Analytic Review.”Personnel Psychology 44: 703–742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilk, S. L., L. B. Desmarais, and P. R. Sackett. 1995. “Gravitation to Jobs Commensurate With Ability: Longitudinal and Cross-Sectional Tests.”Journal of Applied Psychology 80: 79–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Jane W. Licata (jwlicata@sosu.edu) is an associate professor of marketing at Southeastern Oklahoma State University. She has published articles in theJournal of Public Policy and Marketing, theJournal of Marketing Research, and theJournal of Business Research.

John C. Mowen (jcmmkt@okstate.edu) is Regents Professor and holds the Noble Chair of Marketing Strategy at Oklahoma State University. He has published articles in numerous journals, including theJournal of the Academy of Marketing Sciences, theJournal of Marketing Research, theJournal of Marketing, Decisions Sciences, theJournal of Applied Psychology, and theJournal of Personality and Social Psychology.

Eric G. Harris (eharris@lklnd.usf.edu) is an assistant professor of marketing at the University of South Florida. He has published articles inPsychology & Marketing and theJournal of Marketing Management.

Tom J. Brown (tomb@okstate.edu) is an associate professor of marketing at Oklahoma State University. He has published in numerous journals, including theJournal of Marketing, theJournal of Marketing Research, and theJournal of Consumer Research.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Licata, J.W., Mowen, J.C., Harris, E.G. et al. On the trait antecedents and outcomes of service worker job resourcefulness: A hierarchical model approach. JAMS 31, 256–271 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070303031003004

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070303031003004

Key words

Navigation