Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reducing marketing’s conflict with other functions: The differential effects of integrating mechanisms

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To operate effectively, marketing must work in harmony with other functional departments in a firm. This study focuses on marketing’s interactions with three functions that play a key role in the achievement of marketing goals—finance, manufacturing, and R&D. The authors combine insights from previous studies and interviews with practicing managers to identify six integrating mechanisms proposed to mitigate manifest interfunctional conflict (behavior that frustrates marketing initiatives). In addition, they investigate the role of internal volatility (turbulence within an organization) in shaping manifest conflict. Based on a large-scale, multi-informant empirical study, the authors identify the more effective of these six integrating mechanisms. Furthermore, they argue and demonstrate these mechanisms are differentially effective across the marketing-finance, marketing-manufacturing, and marketing-R&D interfaces. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achrol, Ravi S. and Louis W. Stern. 1988. “Environmental Determinants of Decision-Making Uncertainty in Marketing Channels.”Journal of Marketing Research 25 (February): 36–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, Leona S. and Stephen G. West. 1991.Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, Michael and Jerald Hage. 1966. “Organizational Alienation.”American Sociological Review 31 (August): 497–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, Thomas J. 1986.Managing the Flow of Technology. Cambridge, MA: MII Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amason, Allen C. 1996. “Distinguishing the Effect of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams.”Academy of Management Journal 39 (1): 123–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashford, Susan J. 1988. “Individual Strategies for Coping With Stress During Organizational Transitions.”Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 24 (1): 19–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astley, W. Graham and Andrew H. Van de Ven. 1983. “Central Perspectives and Debates in Organizational Theory.”Administrative Science Quarterly 28 (June): 245–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahrami, Homa. 1992. “The Emerging Flexible Organization: Perspectives From Silicon Valley.”California Management Review 34 (Summer): 34–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, Donald W. 1991. “Interdepartmental Conflict in Organizational Buying: The Impact of Organizational Context.”Journal of Marketing Research 27 (May): 145–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Shona L. and Kathleen M. Eisenhardt. 1995. “Product Innovation as Core Capability: The Art of Dynamic Adaptation.” Working paper, Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, Kim. 1986. “A Study of Organizational Effectiveness and Its Predictors.”Management Science 32 (1): 87–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroad, Paul A. and Connie A. Carroad. 1982. “Strategic Interfacing of R&D and Marketing.”Research Management 12 (January): 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Child, John. 1972. “Organization Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice.”Sociology 6: 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Kim B. and Steven C. Wheelwright. 1993.Managing New Product and Process Development. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, Gary and Luis R. Gomez-Mejia. 1991. “Cross-Functional Pay Strategies in High Technology Firms.”Compensation and Benefits Review 23 (September–October): 40–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, Deborah. 1987. “New Products in Old Organizations: The Myth of the Better Mousetrap.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1992. “Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms.”Organization Science 3 (May): 179–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, Katherine M. and Benham N. Tabrizi. 1995. “Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry.”Administrative Science Quarterly 40: 84–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, Robert J., Elliot Maltz, and Bernard J. Jaworski. 1997. “Enhancing Communication Between Marketing and Engineering: The Moderating Role of Relative Functional Identification.”Journal ofMarketing 61 (3): 54–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederich, Robert J. 1982. “In Defense of Multiplicative Terms in Multiple Regression Equations.”American Journal of Political Science 26 (4): 797–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gersick, Connie G. 1994. “Pacing Strategic Change: The Case of a New Venture.”Academy of Management Journal 37 (1): 9–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, Abbie. 1993. “Metrics for Measuring Product Development Lifecycle Time.”Journal of Product Innovation Management 10 (2): 112–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and John R. Hauser. 1993. “The Voice of the Customer.”Marketing Science 12 (Winter): 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and —. 1996. “Integrating R&D and Marketing: A Review and Analysis of the Literature.”Journal of Product Innovation Management 13 (3): 191–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, Ashok K., S. P. Raj, and David Wilemon. 1986a. “A Model for Studying R&D-Marketing Interface in the New Product Development Process.”Journal of Marketing 50 (April): 7–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —,—, and———. 1986b. “R&D and Marketing Managers in High technology Companies: Are They ifferent?”IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management EM-33 (February): 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, John R., Duncan Simester, and Birger Wernerfelt. 1994. “Customer Satisfaction Incentives.”Marketing Science 13 (Fall): 327–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, William L. 1988.Statistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedberg, B., P. C. Nystrom, and William H. Starbuck. 1977. “Designing Organizations to Match Tomorrow.” InPrescriptive Models of Organizations. Eds. P. C. Nystrom and W. H. Starbuck. TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences (V). Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, George. 1984. “The Nature and Design of Post-Industrial Organization.”Management Science 30 (August): 928–951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutt, Michael D. and Thomas W. Speh. 1984. “The Marketing Strategy Center: Diagnosing the Industrial Marketer’s Interdisciplinary Role.”Journal of Marketing 54 (April): 53–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, Bernard J. and Ajay K. Kohli. 1993. “Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences.”Journal of Marketing 57 (3): 53–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jehn, K. 1992. “The Impact of Intragroup Conflict on Effectiveness: A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Conflict.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, Kenneth B. and John T. Mentzer. 1994. “Norms That Distinguish Marketing and Manufacturing.”Journal of Business Research 30 (2): 111–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, Peter. 1992.A Guide to Econometrics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, Ajay K. and Bernard J. Jaworski. 1990. “Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions and Managerial Implications.”Journal of Marketing 54 (April): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuczmarski, Thomas D. 1988.Managing New Products. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, Paul R. and Jay W. Lorsch. 1986.Organization and Environment: Differentiation and Integration. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, Roy J., Stephen E. Weiss, and David Lewin. 1992. “Models of Conflict, Negotiation and Third Party Intervention: A Review and Synthesis.”Journal of Organizational Behavior 13: 209–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maltz, Elliot and Ajay K. Kohli. 1996. “Market Intelligence Dissemination Across Functional Boundaries.”Journal of Marketing Research 33 (February): 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, Charlotte H. and William D. Perrault. 1991. “Collinearity, Power, and Interpretation of Multiple Regression Analysis.”Journal of Marketing Research 28 (August): 268–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menon, Anil, Sundar G. Bharadwaj, and Roy Howell. 1996. “The Quality and Effectiveness of Marketing Strategy: Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Coflict in Intraorganizational Relationships.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 24 (4): 299–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Danny. 1992. “Environmental Fit Versus Internal Fit.”Organization Science 3 (2): 159–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Ming-Jen Chen. 1994. “Sources and Consequences of Competitive Inertia: A Study of the U.S. Airline Industry.”Administrative Science Quarterly 39: 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moenaart, R. K. and W. E. Souder. 1996. “Context and Antecedents of Informantion Utility at the R&D/Marketing Interface.”Management Science 42 (November): 1592–1610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narver, John C. and Stanley F. Slater. 1990. “The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability.”Journal of Marketing 54 (October): 20–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, James C. and Ira H. Bernstein. 1996.Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, Eric M., Orville C. Walker, Jr., and Robert W. Ruekert. 1995. “Organizing for Effective New Product Development: The Moderating Role of Product Innovativeness.”Journal of Marketing 59 (1): 48–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinkley, R. L. 1990. “Dimensions of Conflict Frame: Disputant Interpretations of Conflict.”Journal of Applied Psychology 75: 117–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, Mary Beth, Jeffrey K. Pinto, and John E. Prescott. 1993. “Antecedents and Consequences of Project Team Cross-Functional Cooperation.”Management Science 39 (10): 1281–1296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pondy, Louis R. 1967. “Organizational Conflict.”Administrative Science Quarterly 12 (2): 296–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, Anne H., Jeanne M. Brett, and Linda K. Stroh. 1993. “The Impact of Corporate Turbulence on Managers’ Attitudes.”Strategic Management Journal 14: 167–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roussel, Phillip A., N. Saad, and T. J. Erickson. 1991.Third Generation R&D: Managing the Link to Corporate Strategy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruekert, Robert W. and Orville C. Walker, Jr. 1987. “Marketing’s Interaction With Other Functional Units: A Conceptual Model and Empirical Evidence.”Journal of Marketing 51 (January): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, Benson P. 1977. “Can Marketing and Manufacturing Coexist?”Harvard Business Review 55 (September–October): 104–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, Stanley F. and John C. Narver. 1994. “Does Competitive Environment Moderate the Market Orientation-Performance Relationship?”Journal of Marketing 58 (January): 46–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and —. 1995. “Market Orientation and the Learning Organization.”Journal of Marketing 59 (July): 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souder, William E. 1988. “Managing Relations Between R&D and Marketing in New Product Development Project.”Journal of Product Innovation Management 5: 6–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and Alok L. Chakrabarti. 1978. “The R&D-Marketing Interface: Results From an Empirical Study of Innovation Projects.”IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management EM-25 (4): 88–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Daniel J. Sherman. 1993. “Organizational Design and Organizational Development Solutions to the Problem of R&D-Marketing Integration.”Research in Organizational Change and Development 7: 181–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, Rajendra K., Tassaduq A. Shervani, and Liam Fahey. 1998. “Market-Based Assets and Shareholder Value: A Framework for Analysis.”Journal of Marketing 62 (1): 2–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staw, Barry M., Lance E. Sandelands, and Jane E. Dutton. 1981. “Threat-Rigidity Effects in Organizational Behavior: A Multilevel Analysis.”Administrative Science Quarterly 26 (December): 501–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, Andrew H. and Diane L. Ferry. 1980.Measuring and Assessing Organizations. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, V. D. and L. L. Nolan. 1987. “Small Group Conflict: A Look at Equity, Satisfaction, and Styles of Management.”Small Group Behavior 18: 188–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Workman, John P., Jr. 1993. “Marketing’s Limited Role in New Product Development in One Computer Systems Firm.”Journal of Marketing Research 30 (November): 405–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Willamette University, Salem, USA

    Elliot Maltz

  2. Emory University, Atlanta, USA

    Ajay K. Kohli

Authors
  1. Elliot Maltz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ajay K. Kohli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Elliot Maltz received his MBA from the University of California at Davis and his Ph.D in marketing from the University of Texas at Austin. Prior to coming to the Atkinson School, he taught at the Marshall School of Business at the University of Southern California. Dr. Maltz’s research focuses on how market information can be effectively transmitted from marketing to other functions within a firm (e.g., R&D, manufacturing) or across firms (e.g., in distribution channels, strategic alliances) to facilitate new product development or marketing initiatives designed to respond to changes in market conditions. His research has been published in theJournal of Marketing, theJournal of Marketing Research, theJournal of Business Research, and theJournal of Product Innovation Management and Long Range Planning

Ajay K. Kohli is the Isaac Stiles Hopkins Professor of Marketing at the Goizueta Business School at Emory University. His undergraduate degree is in electrical engineering, and his master’s and Ph.D. degrees are in business administration. He has also taught at the Harvard Business School, the University of Texas at Austin, Koblenz School of Corporate Management in Germany, and at the Norwegian School of Management, Norway. His published work focuses on market orientation, sales management, and B2B Marketing. He has received several research and teaching awards including the Jagdish N. Sheth Award for the best article published in theJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science in 1997, the Alpha Kappa Psi award for best practice-oriented article published in theJournal of Marketing (1990), and the Jack Taylor award for excellence in teaching at the University of Texas at Austin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maltz, E., Kohli, A.K. Reducing marketing’s conflict with other functions: The differential effects of integrating mechanisms. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 28, 479–492 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070300284002

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070300284002

Keywords

Search

Navigation