Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Fundamental changes in marketing organization: The movement toward a customer-focused organizational structure

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There has been growing interest in the future of marketing and changes in marketing’s organization and role within the firm. However, there has not been research that holistically explores key changes in marketing organization. The authors draw on qualitative interviews with 50 managers in the United States and Germany and argue that changes in marketing organization that have been discussed in isolation are part of a more general shift toward customer-focused organizational structures. They initially discuss two specific changes related to the overall shift: changes concerning primary marketing coordinators and increasing dispersion of marketing activities. They then introduce the concept of a customer-focused organizational structure that uses groups of customers as the primary basis for structuring the organization. They identify typical organizational transitions as firms move toward a customer-focused organizational structure and discuss the challenges firms face in making this transition. They conclude with implications for academic research, managerial practice, and business school curriculum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achrol, Ravi S. 1991. “Evolution of the Marketing Organization: New Forms for Turbulent Environments.”Journal of Marketing 55 (October): 77–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1992. “The Dimensions of Marketing Channel Environments.” InAdvances in Distribution Channel Research. Ed. Gary Frazier. Greenwich, CT: JAI, 1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1997. “Changes in the Theory of Interorganizational Relations in Marketing: Toward a Network Paradigm.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 25 (Winter): 56–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ames, Charles B. 1971. “Dilemma of Product/Market Management.”Harvard Business Review 49 (November–December): 141–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Erin and Anne T. Coughlan. 1987. “International Market Entry and Expansion via Independent or Integrated Channels of Distribution.”Journal of Marketing 51 (January): 71–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Paul F. 1982. “Marketing, Strategic Planning, and the Theory of the Firm.”Journal of Marketing 46 (Spring): 15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, Donald W. and J. Brock Smith. 1997. “The Effects of Organizational Differences and Trust on the Effectiveness of Selling Partner Relationships.”Journal of Marketing 61 (January): 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belk, Russell W., John F. Sherry, Jr., and Melanie Wallendorf. 1988. “A Naturalistic Inquiry Into Buyer and Seller Behavior at a Swap Meet.”Journal of Consumer Research 14 (March): 449–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berthon, Pierre, James M. Hulbert, and Leyland F. Pitt. 1997. “Brands, Brand Managers, and the Management of Brands: Where to Next?” MSI Report No. 97-122. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, Peter M. and Richard A. Schoenherr. 1971.The Structure of Organizations. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonoma, Thomas V. 1985. “Case Research in Marketing: Opportunities, Problems, and a Process.”Journal of Marketing Research 22 (May): 199–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucklin, Louis P. and Sanjit Sengupta. 1993. “Organizing Successful Co-Marketing Alliances.”Journal of Marketing 57 (April): 32–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buell, Victor P. 1975. “The Changing Role of the Product Manager in Consumer Goods Companies.”Journal of Marketing 39 (July): 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, David. 1968. “Marketing Organization in British Manufacturing Firms.”Journal of Marketing 32 (April): 34–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cespedes, Frank V. 1989. “Aspects of Marketing Organization: An Introduction.” Teaching Note #9-589-062. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1995.Concurrent Marketing: Integrating Products, Sales, and Service. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, Alfred. 1962.Strategy and Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Robin and Robert S. Kaplan. 1992. “Activity-Based Systems: Measuring the Costs of Resource Usage.”Accounting Horizons 6 (September): 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cravens, David W. 1995. “The Changing Role of the Sales Force.”Marketing Management 4 (2): 48–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, George. 1994. “The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations.”Journal of Marketing 58 (October): 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1997. “Aligning the Organization to the Market.” InReflections on the Futures of Marketing. Eds. Donald R. Lehmann and Katherine E. Jocz. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute, 67–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deal, Terrance E. and A. Kennedy. 1982.Corporate Cultures: The Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Death of the Brand Manager.” 1994.Economist, April 9, pp. 67–68.

  • Deshpandé, Rohit and John U. Farley. 1998. “Measuring Market Orientation: Generalization and Synthesis.”Journal of Market Focused Management 2: 213–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——, and Frederick E. Webster. 1993. “Corporate Culture, Customer Orientation, and Innovativeness in Japanese Firms: A Quadrad Analysis.”Journal of Marketing 57 (January): 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and Frederick E. Webster, Jr. 1989. “Organizational Culture and Marketing: Defining the Research Agenda.”Journal of Marketing 53 (January): 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, Peter. 1995. “Marketing in the New Millennium.”European Journal of Marketing 29 (13): 23–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, Peter. 1954.The Practice of Management. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drumwright, Minette E. 1994. “Socially Responsible Organizational Buying: Environmental Concern as a Noneconomic Buying Criterion.”Journal of Marketing 58 (July): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1996. “Company Advertising With a Social Dimension: The Role of Noneconomic Criteria.”Journal of Marketing 60 (October): 71–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durgee, Jeffrey F. 1986. “Depth-Interview Techniques for Creative Advertising.”Journal of Advertising Research 26 (January): 29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. 1989. “Building Theories From Case Study Research.”Academy of Management Review 14 (4): 532–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, Jay. 1973.Designing Complex Organizations. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1977.Organization Design. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaski, John. 1987. “The History of the Measurement of Power in Marketing Channels.” InReview of Marketing. Ed. Michael J. Houston. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 67–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, Michael, Anthony Freeling, and David Court. 1994. “Reinventing the Marketing Organization.”McKinsey Quarterly, no. 4, 43–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilly, Mary C. and Mary Wolfinbarger. 1998. “Advertising’s Internal Audience.”Journal of Marketing 62 (January): 69–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, Abbie. 1997. “The Effect of Project and Process Characteristics on Product Development Cycle Time.”Journal of Marketing Research 34 (February): 24–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and John R. Hauser. 1996. “Integrating R&D and Marketing: A Review and Analysis of the Literature.”Journal of Product Innovation Management 13 (May): 191–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos, Christian. 1990.Service Management and Marketing: Managing the Moments of Truth in Service Competition. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargadon, Andrew and Robert I. Sutton. 1997. “Technology Brokering and Innovation in a Product Development Firm.”Administrative Science Quarterly 42 (December): 716–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, Elizabeth C. 1986. “Humanistic Inquiry in Marketing Research: Philosophy, Method, and Criteria.”Journal of Marketing Research 23 (August): 237–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, Christian, John P. Workman, Jr., and Harley Krohmer. 1999. “Marketing’s Influence With the Firm.”Journal of Marketing 63 (April): 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulbert, James M. and Leyland Pitt. 1995. “Exit Left Center Stage?”European Management Journal 14 (1): 47–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, Shelby D. and Robert M. Morgan. 1995. “The Comparative Advantage Theory of Competition.”Journal of Marketing 59 (April): 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutt, Michael D., Peter H. Reingen, and John R. Ronchetto, Jr. 1988. “Tracing Emergent Processes in Marketing Strategy Formation.”Journal of Marketing 52 (January): 4–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and Thomas W. Speh. 1984. “The Marketing Strategy Center: Diagnosing the Industrial Marketer’s Interdisciplinary Role.”Journal of Marketing 48 (Fall): 53–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, Bernard J. and Ajay K. Kohli. 1993. “Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences.”Journal of Marketing 57 (July): 53–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, Ajay. 1989. “Determinants of Influence in Organizational Buying: A Contingency Approach.”Journal of Marketing 53 (July): 50–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and Bernard J. Jaworski. 1990. “Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications.”Journal of Marketing 54 (April): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——, and Ajith Kumar. 1993. “MARKOR: A Measure of Market Orientation.”Journal of Marketing Research 30 (November): 467–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, Paul R. and Jay W. Lorsch. 1967.Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton, Dorothy. 1992. “Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development.”Strategic Management Journal 13 (Summer): 111–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, Theodore. 1960. “Marketing Myopia.”Harvard Business Review 38 (July–August): 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, George S. and Ronald A. Fullerton. 1994. “Brands, Brand Management, and the Brand Manager System: A Critical-Historical Evaluation.”Journal of Marketing Research 31 (May): 173–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, Malcolm, Tony Millman, and Beth Rogers. 1997. “Key Account Management: Theory, Practice, and Challenges.”Journal of Marketing Management 13: 737–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, Regis. 1991. “Marketing Is Everything.”Harvard Business Review 69 (January–February): 65–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishler, Elliot G. 1986.Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, David B. and Frederick E. Webster, Jr. 1997. “Marketing’s Interfunctional Interfaces: The MSI Workshop on Management of Corporate Fault Zones.”Journal of Market-Focused Management 2: 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadler, David A. and Michael Tushman. 1988.Strategic Organization Design: Concepts, Tools and Processes. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narver, John C. and Stanley F. Slater. 1990. “The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability.”Journal of Marketing 54 (October): 20–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, Thomas J. and Robert H. Waterman, Jr. 1982.In Search of Excellence. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, Jeffrey. 1978.Organizational Design. Arlington Heights, IL: AHM.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1981.Power in Organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1982.Organizations and Organization Theory. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piercy, Nigel F. 1985.Marketing Organisation: An Analysis of Information Processing, Power, and Politics. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1987. “The Marketing Budgeting Process: Marketing Management Implications.”Journal of Marketing 51 (October): 45–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pine, B. Joseph II, Bart Victor, and Andrew C. Boynton. 1993. “Making Mass Customization Work.”Harvard Business Review 71 (September–October): 108–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, Derek S., D. J. Hickson, C. R. Hinings, and C. Turner. 1968. “Dimensions of Organizational Structure.”Administrative Science Quarterly 13: 268–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schouten, John W. and James H. McAlexander. 1995. “Subcultures of Consumption: An Ethnography of the New Bikers.”Journal of Consumer Research 22 (June): 43–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. Richard. 1992.Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, Jagdish N. and Rajendra S. Sisodia. 1995. “Feeling the Heat—Part 1.”Marketing Management 4 (Fall): 8–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinkula, James M. 1994. “Market Information Processing and Organizational Learning.”Journal of Marketing 58 (January): 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, Stanley F. and John C. Narver. 1994. “Does Competitive Environment Moderate the Market Orientation-Performance Relationship?”Journal of Marketing 58 (January): 46–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and —. 1995. “Market Orientation and the Learning Organization.”Journal of Marketing 59 (July): 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szymanski, David M. and Gilbert A. Churchill, Jr. 1990. “Client Evaluation Cues: A Comparison of Successful and Unsuccessful Salespeople.”Journal of Marketing Research 27 (May): 163–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Michael J. 1994. “Marketing—In Chaos or Transition?”European Journal of Marketing 28 (3): 55–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tull, Donald S., Bruce E. Cooley, Mark R. Phillips, Jr., and Harry S. Watkins. 1991. “The Organization of Marketing Activities of American Manufacturers.” Marketing Science Institute Working Paper No. 91-126; Cambridge, MA 02138.

  • Walker, Orville C., Jr. 1997. “The Adaptability of Network Organizations: Some Unexplored Questions.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 25 (Winter): 75–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, Frederick E., Jr. 1981. “Top Management’s Concerns About Marketing Issues for the 1980s.”Journal of Marketing 45 (Summer): 9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1992. “The Changing Role of Marketing in the Corporation.”Journal of Marketing 56 (October): 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1997. “The Future Role of Marketing in the Organization.” InReflections on the Futures of Marketing. Ed. Donald R. Lehmann and Katherine E. Jocz. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute, 39–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, Alan L. and William G. Ouchi. 1983. “Efficient Cultures: Exploring the Relationship Between Culture and Organizational Performance.”Administrative Science Quarterly 28 (September): 468–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Workman, John P., Jr. 1993. “Marketing’s Limited Role in New Product Development in One Computer Systems Firm.”Journal of Marketing Research 30 (November): 405–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, Christian Homburg, and Kjell Gruner. 1998. “Marketing Organization: An Integrative Framework of Dimensions and Determinants.”Journal of Marketing 62 (July): 21–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaltman, Gerald, Karen LeMasters, and Michael Heffring. 1982.Theory Construction in Marketing: Some Thoughts on Thinking. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany

    Christian Homburg & Ove Jensen

  2. Creighton University, Omaha, USA

    John P. Workman

Authors
  1. Christian Homburg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John P. Workman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ove Jensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Christian Homburg is a professor of business administration and marketing and Chair of the Marketing Department at the University of Mannheim in Germany. He received his Ph.D. and master’s degrees from the University of Karlsruhe and earned his habilitation at the University of Mainz. His research interests include organizational issues in marketing, customer orientation, industrial marketing, and relationship marketing. Dr. Homburg has consulted and delivered executive education programs for more than one hundred companies, including Daimler-Benz, Siemens, Deutsche Bank, Hoechst, RWE, Thyssen, Krupp-Hoesch and Sodexho.

John P. Workman, Jr. is an associate professor of marketing at Creighton University in Omaha, Nebraska. Dr. Workman conducts research on the organization and role of marketing within the firm, on new product development in high-tech firms, and more recently on organizational issues for e-commerce initiatives. His research uses concepts from organization theory, strategy, and sociology to examine the interactions between marketing and other groups in the firm. Dr. Workman has a B.S. from N.C. State University, an M.B.A. from the University of Virginia, and a Ph.D. from M.I.T. He has consulted for a number of organizations on the topics of e-commerce and marketing organization.

Ove Jensen is a Ph.D. student studying under Professor Homburg at the University of Mannheim. He received his master’s degree from the WHU Koblenz. He conducts research on sales management, organizational issues in marketing, and incentive systems. He has extensive consulting experience in the areas of market-focused management and sales management.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Homburg, C., Workman, J.P. & Jensen, O. Fundamental changes in marketing organization: The movement toward a customer-focused organizational structure. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 28, 459–478 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070300284001

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070300284001

Keywords

Search

Navigation