Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Price and brand name as indicators of quality dimensions for consumer durables

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Delivering quality products requires an understanding of the critical dimensions and cues that consumers use to judge quality. To that end, this article addresses two fundamental research issues. Using a qualitative study, the authors first develop a generalizable typology of quality dimensions for durable goods that includes ease of use, versatility, durability, serviceability, performance, and prestige. Second, the authors conduct a process-tracing laboratory experiment to examine how key marketing variables—price, brand name, and product attributes—affect consumers’ judgment processes and inferences about how products perform on the six quality dimensions. Results of the experiment indicate that consumers use price and brand name differently to judge the quality dimensions, searching for price and brand name much more frequently when evaluating prestige than when evaluating any other quality dimension. Results suggest that managers must determine the relevant quality dimensions for a product category and the cues that are salient for judging those dimensions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Belk, Russell W., John F. Sherry, Jr., and Melanie Wallendorf. 1988. “A Naturalistic Inquiry Into Buyer and Seller Behavior at a Swap Meet.”Journal of Consumer Research 14 (March): 449–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellenger, Danny, Kenneth Bernhardt, and Jac Goldstucker. 1976.Qualitative Research in Marketing. Chicago: American Marketing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, William, Ajay Kalra, Richard Staelin, and Valarie A. Zeithaml. 1993. “A Dynamic Process Model of Service Quality: From Expectations to Behavioral Outcomes.”Journal of Marketing Research 30 (February): 7–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brucks, Merrie. 1985. “The Effects of Product Class Knowledge on Information Search Behavior.”Journal of Consumer Research 12 (1): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1988. “Search Monitor: An Approach for Computer-Controlled Experiments Involving Consumer Information Search.”Journal of Consumer Research 15 (June): 117–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, William G. and Gertrude M. Cox., 1957.Experimental Design. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, Philip B. 1979.Quality Is Free. New York: New American Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darby, M. R. and E. Karni. 1973. “Free Competition and the Optimal Amount of Fraud.”Journal of Law and Economics 16 (April): 67–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etgar, Michael and Naresh K. Malhotra. 1981. “Determinants of Price Dependency: Personal and Perceptual Factors.”Journal of Consumer Research 8 (September): 217–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, L. 1967. “Psychological Pricing in the Food Industry.” InPrices: Issues in Theory, Practice, and Public Policy. Eds. A. Phillips and O. Williamson. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 71–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, D. M. 1971. “Is There a Generalized Price-Quality Relationship?”Journal of Marketing Research 8 (May): 241–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garvin, David A. 1987. “Competing on the Eight Dimensions of Quality.”Harvard Business Review 65 (November–December): 101–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, John A., Scott M. Broeztmann, and Dianne S. Ward. 1993. “Preventing TQM Problems: Measured Steps Toward Customer-Driven Quality Improvement.”National Productivity Review 12 (Autumn): 555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjorth-Anderson, Chr. 1984. “The Concept of Quality and the Efficiency of Markets for Consumer Products.”Journal of Consumer Research 2: 708–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, Morris B. and Kim P. Corfman. 1985. “Quality and Value in the Consumption Experience: Phaedrus Rides Again.” InPerceived Quality. Eds. J. Jacoby and J. Olson. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 31–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, Jacob, Jerry C. Olson, and Rafael A. Haddock. 1971. “Price, Brand Name, and Product Composition Characteristics as Determinants of Perceived Quality.”Journal of Applied Psychology 55 (6): 570–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, G. J. Szybillo, and J. Busato-Schach. 1977. “Information Acquisition Behavior in Brand Choice Situations.”Journal of Consumer Research 3: 209–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, R. W. Chestnut, W. D. Hoyer, D. W. Sheluga, and M. J. Donahue. 1978. “Psychometric Characteristics of Behavioral Process Data: Preliminary Findings on Validity and Generalizability.” InAdvances in Consumer Research, Vol. 5. Ed. K. Hunt. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 546–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Albert. 1993. “Eight TQM Pitfalls.”Journal for Quality and Participation 16 (4): 24–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levit, Steve. 1994.Quality Is Just the Beginning. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, Donald R. and Scot Burton. 1989. “The Relationship Between Perceived and Objective Price-Quality.”Journal of Marketing Research 26 (November): 429–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, Peter H. Bloch, and William C. Black. 1988. “Correlates of Price Acceptability.”Journal of Consumer Research 15 (September): 243–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Main, Jeremy. 1994.Quality Wars. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynes, E. Scott. 1976. “The Concept and Measurement of Product Quality.”Household Production and Consumption 40 (5): 529–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazursky, David and Jacob Jacoby. 1985. “Forming Impressions of Merchandise and Service Quality.” InPerceived Quality. Eds. Jacob Jacoby and J. Olson. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 13–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monroe, Kent B. and R. Krishnan. 1985. “The Effect of Price on Subjective Product Evaluations.” InPerceived Quality. Eds. J. Jacoby and J. Olson. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 209–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Philip. 1970. “Information and Consumer Behavior.”Journal of Political Economy 78 (2): 311–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, Jerry G. 1977. “Price as an Informational Cue: Effects in Product Evaluation.” InConsumer and Industrial Buying Behavior. Eds. Arch G. Woodside, Jagdish N. Sheth, and Peter D. Bennet. New York: North Holland, 267–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozanne, Julie L. 1985. “The Influence of Perceived Discrepancy and Mood on Search Behavior.” Dissertation. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A., Valarie A. Zeithaml, and Leonard Berry. 1985. “A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implication for Future Research.”Journal of Marketing 49 (Fall): 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——, and —. 1988. “SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality.”Journal of Retailing 64 (Spring): 12–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Leonard L. Berry, and Valarie A. Zeithaml. 1990. “An Empirical Examination of Relationships in an Extended Service Quality Model.” Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute, Report No. 90-122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. Whan, Bernard J. Jaworski, and Deborah J. MacInnis. 1986. “Strategic Brand Concept-Image Management.”Journal of Marketing 50 (October): 135–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Robert A. 1970. “The Price-Perceived Quality Relationship: Experimental Evidence.”Journal of Marketing Research 7 (November): 525–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and A. Jolibert. 1976. “A Cross-National Investigation of Price Brand Determinants of Perceived Product Quality.”Journal of Applied Psychology 61 (July): 533–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, Akshay R. and Kent B. Monroe. 1988. “The Moderating Effect of Prior Knowledge on Cue Utilization in Product Evaluations”Journal of Consumer Research 15 (September): 250–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Kent B. Monroe. 1989. “The Effect of Price, Brand Name, and Store Name on Buyer’s Perceptions of Product Quality: An Integrative Review.”Journal of Marketing Research 26 (August): 351–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and Wanda A. Sieben. 1992. “The Effect of Prior Knowledge of Price Acceptability and the Type of Information Examined.”Journal of Consumer Research 19 (2): 256–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riesz, P. 1978. “Price Versus Quality in the Marketplace, 1961–1975.”Journal of Retailing 54 (4): 15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudie, Mary-J. and H. Brant Wansley. 1985. “The Merrill Lynch Quality Program.” InServices Marketing in a Changing Environment. Eds. Thomas Bloch, Gregory Upah, and Valarie A. Zeithaml. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 7–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, Alan G. 1975. “Demand Artifacts in Laboratory Experiments in Consumer Research.”Journal of Consumer Research 1 (March): 20–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, B. P. 1973. “Price Reliance: Existence and Sources.”Journal of Marketing Research 10 (August): 286–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. M. and C. Broome. 1966. “Experimental Determination of the Effect of Price and Market-Standing Information on Consumers’ Brand Preferences.” InProceedings of the American Marketing Association. Ed. R. M. Haas. Chicago: American Marketing Association. 520–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, Michael R. 1983. “The Role of Products as Social Stimuli: A Symbolic Interactionism Perspective.”Journal of Consumer Research 10 (December): 319–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, Raymond C. 1985. “The Effect of Price, Package Design, and Brand Familiarity on Perceived Quality.” InPerceived Quality. Eds. J. Jacoby and J. Olson, Lexington, MA: Lexington Press, 233–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Anselm and Juliet Corbin. 1990.Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory and Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, J. 1974. “Price-Product Performance Competition Between Retailer and Manufacturer Brands.”Journal of Marketing 38 (July): 52–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Craig J., William B. Locander, and Howard Pollio. 1989. “Putting Consumer Experience Back Into Consumer Research: The Philosophy and Method of Existential-Phenomenology.”Journal of Consumer Research 16 (September): 133–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Phillip, Glenn DeSouza, and Bradley T. Gale. 1985.The Strategic Management of Service Quality. Cambridge, MA: The Strategic Planning Institute, PIMSLETTER No. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, Valarie A. 1988. “Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence.”Journal of Marketing 52 (July): 2–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Arizona, Arizona, USA

    Merrie Brucks

  2. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA

    Valarie A. Zeithaml

  3. University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, USA

    Gillian Naylor

Authors
  1. Merrie Brucks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Valarie A. Zeithaml
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gillian Naylor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Merrie Brucks is a professor of marketing at the University of Arizona, where she also holds a joint appointment in the Department of Psychology. She received her Ph. D. in marketing from Carnegie Mellon University. Her research first received scholarly recognition in 1984, when she won the Robert Ferber Award for the best doctoral dissertation in the field of consumer behavior. Since that time, she has published extensively in consumer psychology, focusing on memory, information search, judgment, and decision-making processes. In other research she has examined a variety of public policy issues related to advertising.

Valarie A. Zeithaml is a professor and area chair at the Kenan-Flagler Business School of the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. She is also a Sarah Graham Kenan Distinguished Scholar at that institution. She obtained an MBA and doctorate from the University of Maryland and has devoted the past 20 years to researching and teaching the topics of service quality and services management. She is the author ofDelivery Quality Service: Balancing Customer Perceptions and Expectations and ofServices Marketing, a textbook now in its second edition. She has won numerous teaching and research awards, including the Ferber Award from theJournal of Consumer Research, the Maynard Award from theJournal of Marketing, the Jagdish Sheth Award from theJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, and the O’Dell Award from theJournal of Marketing Research.

Gillian Naylor is an assistant professor of marketing at the University of Nevada Las Vegas. She obtained a doctorate from the University of Arizona in 1996. Her research interests are within the consumer judgment and decision-making domain, with specific interest in postpurchase processes and services marketing.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brucks, M., Zeithaml, V.A. & Naylor, G. Price and brand name as indicators of quality dimensions for consumer durables. JAMS 28, 359–374 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070300283005

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070300283005

Keywords

Search

Navigation