Advertisement

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 296–312 | Cite as

Marketing strategy and the internet: An organizing framework

  • P. Rajan Varadarajan
  • Manjit S. Yadav
Article

Abstract

Competitive strategy is primarily concerned with how a business should deploy resources at its disposal to achieve and maintain defensible competitive positional advantages in the marketplace. Competitive marketing strategy focuses on how a business should deploy marketing resources at its disposal to facilitate the achievement and maintenance of competitive positional advantages in the marketplace. In a growing number of product-markets, the competitive landscape has evolved from a predominantly physical marketplace to one encompassing both the physical and the electronic marketplace. This article presents a conceptual framework delineating the drivers and outcomes of marketing strategy in the context of competing in this broader, evolving marketplace. The proposed framework provides insights into changes in the nature and scope of marketing strategy; specific industry, product, buyer, and buying environment characteristics; and the unique skills and resources of the firm that assume added relevance in the context of competing in the evolving marketplace.

Keywords

Marketing Strategy Search Cost Network Externality Harvard Business Review Competitive Strategy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abell, Derek F. 1980.Defining the Business: The Starting Point of Strategic Planning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Ackerlof, George. 1970. “The Market for ‘Lemons’: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism.”Quarterly Journal of Economics 84 (3): 488–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adam, Nabil and Yelena Yesha. 1996. “Strategic Directions in Electronic Commerce and Digital Libraries: Towards a Digital Agora.”ACM Computing Surveys 28 (4): 818–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alba, Joseph, John Lynch, Barton Weitz, Chris Janiszewski, Richard Lutz, Alan Sawyer, and Stacy Wood. 1997. “Interactive Home Shopping: Consumer, Retailer, and Manufacturer Incentives to Participate in Electronic Marketplaces.”Journal of Marketing 61 (July): 38–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bain, Joseph. 1956.Barriers to Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bakos, J. Yannis. 1991. “A Strategic Analysis of Electronic Market-places.”MIS Quarterly 15 (September): 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. —. 1997. “Reducing Buyer Search Costs: Implications for Electronic Marketplaces.”Management Science 43 (December): 676–692.Google Scholar
  8. Balasubramanian, Sridhar, Vish V. Krishnan, and Mohanbir Sawhney. 2000. “New Offering Realization in the Networked Digital Environment.” InDigital Marketing. Eds. Vijay Mahajan and Jerry Wind. New York: John Wiley, 310–338.Google Scholar
  9. Barney, Jay B. 1991. “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage.”Journal of Management 17 (1): 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. — 1996.Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage. Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  11. Barrett, S. and B. Konsynski. 1982. “Inter-Organization Information Sharing Systems.”MIS Quarterly 6:93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Benjamin, Robert and Rolf Wigand. 1995. “Electronic Markets and Virtual Chains on the Information Superhighway.”Sloan Management Review 36 (2): 62–72.Google Scholar
  13. Berger, Paul D. and Nada I. Nasr. 1998. “Customer Lifetime Value: Marketing Models and Applications.”Journal of Interactive Marketing 12 (1): 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Blattberg, Robert C. and John Deighton. 1991. “Interactive Marketing: Exploiting the Age of Addressability.”Sloan Management Review 33 (1): 5–14.Google Scholar
  15. Brynjolfsson, Erik and Abraham Seidmann. 1997. “A Call for Exploration: Introduction to Special Issue on Frontier Research on Information Systems and Economics.”Management Science 43 (12): 1605–1607.Google Scholar
  16. Burke, Raymond. 1996. “Virtual Shopping: Breakthrough in Marketing Research.”Harvard Business Review 74 (March/April): 120–131.Google Scholar
  17. —. 1997. “Do You See What I See? The Future of Virtual Shopping.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 25 (Fall): 352–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cairncross, Frances. 1997.The Death of Distance: How the Communication Revolution Will Change Our Lives. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  19. Christensen, Clayton M. and Michael Overdorf. 2000. “Meeting the Challenge of Disruptive Change.”Harvard Business Review 78 (March–April): 221–230.Google Scholar
  20. Clark, David D. 1996. “Adding Service Discrimination to the Internet.”Telecommunications Policy 20 (3): 169–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Darby, Michael R. and Edi Karni. 1973. “Free Competition and the Optimal Amount of Fraud.”Journal of Law and Economics 16 (April): 67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. D’Aveni, Richard A. 1999. “Strategic Supremacy Through Disruption and Dominance.”Sloan Management Review 40 (3): 127–135.Google Scholar
  23. Dickson, Peter R. 1992. “Toward a General Theory of Competitive Rationnality.”Journal of Marketing 56 (1): 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. — and Alan G. Sawyer. 1990. “The Price Knowledge and Search of Supermarket Shoppers.”Journal of Consumer Research 54 (July): 42–53.Google Scholar
  25. Douglas, Susan. 1991. “Broadcasting Begins.” InCommunications in History: Technology, Culture, and Society. Eds. David Crowley and Paul Heyer. New York: Longman, 190–197.Google Scholar
  26. Economides, Nicholas and Frederick Flyer. 1998. “Compatibility and Market Structure for Network Goods.” Working Paper EC-98-02. Stern School of Business, New York University.Google Scholar
  27. Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. and Jeffrey A. Martin. 2000. “Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They?”Strategic Management Journal 21 (10–11): 1105–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Farrell, Joseph and Garth Saloner. 1985. “Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation.”Rand Journal of Economics 16 (Spring): 70–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. ——. 1986. “Installed Base and Compatibility: Innovation, Product Preannouncements, and Predation.”American Economic Review 76 (December): 940–955.Google Scholar
  30. Fidler, Roger. 1997.Mediamorphosis: Understanding the New Media. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
  31. Frank, Robert H. and Philip J. Cook. 1995.The Winner-Take-All Society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  32. Glazer, Rashi. 1991. “Marketing in an Information-Intensive Environment: Strategic Implications of Knowledge as an Asset.”Journal of Marketing 55 (October): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Grewal, Raj, James A. Comer, and Raj Mehta. 2001. “An Investigation Into the Antecedents of Organizational Participation in Business-to-Business Electronic Markets.”Journal of Marketing 65 (July): 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gupta, Sunil and Rabikar Chatterjee. 1997. “Consumer and Corporate Adoption of the World Wide Web as a Commercial Medium.” InElectronic Marketing and the Consumer. Ed. Robert A. Peterson. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 123–138.Google Scholar
  35. Gurbaxani, Vijay and Seungjin Whang. 1991. “The Impact of Information Systems on Organizations and Markets.”Communications of the ACM 34 (January): 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hanson, Ward. 1998. “The Original WWW: Web Lesson From the Early Days of Radio.”Journal of Interactive Marketing 12 (3): 46–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Haubl, Gerald and Valerie Trifts. 2000. “Consumer Decision Making in Online Shopping Environments: The Effects of Interactive Decision Aids.”Marketing Science 19 (1): 4–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hofer, Charles W. and Dan Schendel. 1978.Strategy Formulation: Analytical Concepts. St. Paul, MN: West.Google Scholar
  39. Hoffman, Donna L. and Thomas P. Novak. 1996. “Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments: Conceptual Foundations.”Journal of Marketing 60 (3): 50–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. ——. 1997. “A New Marketing Paradigm for Electronic Commerce.”Information Society 13 (1): 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hotelling, Harold. 1929. “Stability in Competition.”Economic Journal 39:41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Huber, George P. 1990. “A Theory of the Effects of Advanced Information Technologies on Organizational Design, Intelligence, and Decision Making.”Academy of Management Review 15:47–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hunt, Shelby D. 2000.A General Theory of Competition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  44. Katz, Michael L. and Carl Shapiro. 1985. “Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility.”The American Economic Review 75 (June): 424–440.Google Scholar
  45. Keep, William W., Stanley C. Hollander, and Roger Dickson. 1998. “Forces Impinging on Long-Term Business-to-Business Relationships in the United States: An Historical Perspective.”Journal of Marketing 62 (2): 31–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Klein, Benjamin and Keith B. Leffler. 1981. “The Role of Market Forces in Assuring Contractual Performance.”Journal of Political Economy 89 (4): 615–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Levitt, Theodore. 1981. “Marketing Intangible Products and Product Intangibles.”Harvard Business Review 59 (3): 94–102.Google Scholar
  48. Lynch, John and Dan Ariely. 2000. “Wine Online: Search Costs and Competition on Price, Quality, and Distribution.”Marketing Science 19 (1): 83–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Malone, Thomas W. 1997. “Is Empowerment Just a Fad? Control, Decision Making, and IT.”Sloan Management Review 38 (2): 23–35.Google Scholar
  50. —, JoAnne Yates, and Robert I. Benjamin. 1989. “The Logic of Electronic Markets.”Harvard Business Review 67 (May/June): 166–172.Google Scholar
  51. Mayntz, Renate and Thomas P. Hughes. 1988.The Development of Large Technical Systems. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  52. Nelson, Philip. 1970. “Information and Consumer Behavior.”Journal of Political Economy 78 (March/April): 311–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Oliver, Jim R. 1996. “A Machine-Learning Approach to Automated Negotiation and Prospects for Electronic Commerce.”Journal of Management Information Systems 13 (3): 83–112.Google Scholar
  54. Peppers, Don, Martha Rogers, and Bob Dorf. 1999. “Is Your Company Ready for One-to-One Marketing?”Harvard Business Review 77 (January/February) 151–160.Google Scholar
  55. Peterson, Robert A., Sridhar Balasubramanian, and Bart J. Bronnenberg. 1997. “Exploring the Implications of the Internet for Consumer Marketing.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 25 (Fall): 329–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Porter, Michael E. 2001. “Strategy and the Internet.”Harvard Business Review 79 (3): 63–78.Google Scholar
  57. — and Victor E. Millar. 1985. “How Information Gives You Competitive Advantage.”Harvard Business Review 63 (July–August): 149–160.Google Scholar
  58. Prahalad, C. K. and Gary Hamel. 1990. “The Core Competence of the Corporation.”Harvard Business Review 68 (May–June): 79–91.Google Scholar
  59. Rao, Akshay R. and Mark E. Bergen. 1992. “Price Premium Variations as a Consequence of Buyers’ Lack of Information.”Journal of Consumer Research 19 (December): 412–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rayport, Jeffrey F. and John J. Sviokla. 1994. “Managing in the Marketspace.”Harvard Business Review 72 (November/December): 141–150.Google Scholar
  61. Salop, Steven C. and Joseph Stiglitz. 1977. “Bargains and Ripoffs: A Model of Monopolitically Competitive Price Dispersion.”Review of Economics and Statistics 54 (December): 493–510.Google Scholar
  62. Shapiro, Carl and Hal R. Varian. 1999.Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  63. Shostack, g. Lynn. 1977. “Breaking Free From Product Marketing.”Journal of Marketing 41 (April): 73–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sinha, Indrajit. 2000. “Cost Transparency: The Net’s Real Threat to Prices and Brands.”Harvard Business Review 78 (March-April): 3–8.Google Scholar
  65. Steuer, Jonathan. 1992. “Defining Virtual Reality: Dimension Determine Telepresence.”Journal of Communication 42 (Autumn): 73–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stigler, George J.. 1961. “The Economics of Information.”Journal of Political Economy 69 (June): 213–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tapscott, Don. 1996.Digital Economy: Promise and Peril in the Age of Networked Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  68. Teece, David J., Gary Pisano, and Amy Shuen. 1997. “Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management.”Strategic Management Journal 18 (7): 509–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Urbany, Joel. 1986. “An Experimental Examination of the Economics of Information.”Journal of Consumer Research 13 (September): 257–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. —, Peter R. Dickson, and William L. Wilkie. 1989. “Buyer Uncertainty and Information Search.”Journal of Consumer Research 16 (September): 208–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Webster, Frederick E., Jr. and Yoram Wind. 1972.Organizational Buying Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  72. Weill, Peter and Marianne Broadbent. 1998.Leveraging the New Infrastructure: How Market Leaders Capitalize on Information Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  73. Yadav, Manjit S. and Rajan Varadarajan. 2001. “Interactivity in the Electronic Marketplace: An Exposition of the Concept and Its Implications for Product Migration.” Working Paper. Department of Marketing, Texas A&M University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Rajan Varadarajan
    • 1
  • Manjit S. Yadav
    • 1
  1. 1.Texas A&M UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations