Advertisement

Statistical and Operational Issues Arising in an Interim Analysis When the Study Will Continue

Abstract

Guidelines/or conducting interim analyses in clinical trials sponsored by the pharmaceutical industry have been recently published (1). Usually, the clinical trial will terminate or the design will change when the interim analysis shows outstanding efficacy results. There are situations, however, where the interim analysis shows outstanding efficacy results and yet the study continues, for example, when regulatory requirements in the United States and Europe differ concerning study duration. A case study is presented which describes the statistical and operational issues encountered while performing a two-year interim analysis of a three-year registration study when the study was to continue to the three-year timepoint with the same design regardless of the outcome of the interim analysis. The statistician plays a central role in developing and implementing the strategy to effectively resolve these issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 189

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

References

  1. 1.

    PMA Biostatistics and Medical A. Hoc Committee on Interim Analysis. Interim analysis in the pharmaceutical industry. Control Clin Trials 1993;14:160–173.

  2. 2.

    Enas GG, Zerbe RL. A paradigm for interim analyses in controlled clinical trials. J Clin Res Drug Develop 1993;7:193–202.

  3. 3.

    Jennison C, Turnbull BW. Statistical approaches to interim monitoring of medical trials: A review and commentary. Stat Sci 1990;5(3):299–317.

  4. 4.

    Lee JW. Group sequential testing in clinical trials with multivariate observations: A review. Stat Med 1994;13:101–111.

  5. 5.

    Lee JW, DeMets DL. Group sequential comparison of changes: Ad hoc versus more exact method. Biometrics 1995;5:21–30.

  6. 6.

    O’Neill RT. Conclusions to early stopping rules workshop. Stat Med 1994;13:1493–1499.

  7. 7.

    ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guidance. Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials (E9). Recommended for Adoption at Step 4, 1998.

  8. 8.

    Freedman L, Anderson G, Kipnis V, Prentice R, Wang CY, Rossouw J, Wittes J, DeMets D. Approaches to monitoring the results of long-term disease prevention trials. Control Clin Trials 1996;17:509–525.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to William Huster PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huster, W., Shah, A., Kaiser, G. et al. Statistical and Operational Issues Arising in an Interim Analysis When the Study Will Continue. Ther Innov Regul Sci 33, 869–875 (1999) doi:10.1177/009286159903300328

Download citation

Key Words

  • Interim analysis
  • Type I error
  • Operational bias
  • Pharmaceutical trial
  • Statistical adjustment