Advertisement

The Over-The-Counter Scientific/ Regulatory Paradigm

  • 7 Citations

Abstract

A dialogue-driven, case-by-case, weight-of-the-evidence approach utilizing specific switch criteria and encompassing the application of evolving science and technology continues to be the foundational underpinning of the pivotal benefit-risk assessment determining over-the-counter (OTC)ness of an ingredient. As an OTC scientific/regulatory paradigm, it is robust and should be preserved, especially in any guidances the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) may issue about the “OTC-ability” of specific therapeutic agents.

In developing this premise in the context of the pivotal benefit-risk assessment, it is important to consider:

  • The OTC Review rulemaking as the foundation of the OTC scientific/regulatory para-digm

  • How OTC new drug approval in the 1990s did not change the OTC paradigm per se, but rather allowed the OTC paradigm to be fulfilled as it was always envisioned to be fulfilled by the creators of the OTC Review and the OTC scientific/regulatory paradigm definers (the OTC panels)

  • The FDA’s recent negative guidance on OTC drugs for hypercholesterolemia, which challenges the current robust OTC scientific/regulatory paradigm

  • A specific recommendation to FDA on how to express the agency’s current thinking on specific OTC candidates in guidance documents, in order to be consistent with the current OTC scientific/regulatory paradigm and thus help ensure that OTC research and development of novel OTC drugs can flourish in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 189

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

References

  1. 1.

    Soller RW. OTCness. Drug Inf J. 1997;32:555–560.

  2. 2.

    Federal Register. 37:84–89, 1972.

  3. 3.

    Federal Register. 9464–9475. Washington; 1972.

  4. 4.

    21 Code of Federal Regulations. 21;330.10(4)(i).

  5. 5.

    21 Code of Federal Regulations. 21;330.1(K4)(ii).

  6. 6.

    21 Code of Federal Regulations. 21;330.10(4)(v).

  7. 7.

    Federal Register. 37:9469. Washington; 1972.

  8. 8.

    Federal Register. 43:46708, Washington; 1978.

  9. 8.

    Federal Register. 47:38481–84, Washington; 1982.

  10. 10.

    Federal Register. 51:16258–67, Washington; 1986.

  11. 11.

    Federal Register. 38:31260–69, Washington; 1973.

  12. 12.

    Federal Register. 62:55645, Washington; 1997.

  13. 13.

    Federal Register. 62:28234-45, Washington; 1997.

  14. 14.

    Federal Register. 63:23624–32, Washington; 1998.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to R. William Soller PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Soller, R.W. The Over-The-Counter Scientific/ Regulatory Paradigm. Ther Innov Regul Sci 33, 799–804 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1177/009286159903300320

Download citation

Key Words

  • Over-the-counter
  • OTCness
  • Scientific/regulatory paradigm