A large amount of literature has been published on methods for determining sample size and power for clinical trials. Although formulae exist to determine sample size for different designs, in practice the methods are rarely used. Instead, sample size estimates are usually based on simple formulae derived for the comparison of two means or binomial proportions.
This paper describes some useful theory for sample size estimation when comparing more than two treatment groups. Where the theory is not applicable, it is demonstrated that simulation can be used as an alternative approach.
Sample size Analysis of variance Dose-response Simulation
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Montgomery SA, Asberg M. A new depression rating scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry. 1979;134:382–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindley DV, Scott WF. New Cambridge Elementary Statistical Tables. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1984.Google Scholar
Banner NR, Lloyd HM, Hamilton RD, Innes JA, Guz A, Yacoub MH. Cardiopulmonary response to dynamic exercise after heart and combined heart-lung transplanatation. Br Heart J. 1989;61:215–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucki I, Rickeis K, Gesecke MA, Geller A. Differential effects of the anxiolytic drugs, diazepam and buspirone, on memory function. Br J Clin Pharacol. 1987;23:207–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowbotham DJ, Nimmo WS. Effects of cisapride on morphine-induced delay in gastric emptying. Br J Anaesth. 1987;59:536–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tatsuta M, Isihi H, Yamamura H, Yamamoto R, Taniguchi H. Enhancement by tetragastrin of experimental induction of gastric epithelium in the duodenum. Gut. 1989;30:311–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laubscher NF. Normalizing the noncentral t and F distributions. Ann Math Stat. 1960;31:1105–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press; 1977.Google Scholar