Abstract
This paper introduces the notion of a maximum contrast method for data analysis on experiments in a one-way layout with levels corresponding to doses of a test chemical. It is defined as the method which uses the maximum of a set of contrast statistics to make decisions for objectives, such as determining the minimum effective dose (MED) in clinical trials, the minimum toxic dose (MTD) in chronic toxicity studies, or a plausible dose-response pattern in dose-response studies, where a contrast statistic is defined as the ratio of a contrast of mean response for dose groups and an estimator of the standard deviation of the numerator. Along with this notion the authors devised an extended Williams method for unequal group sizes and compared the performance of three methods: the Williams method, a modified Williams method, and the max-t method, all of which are often used to identify the MTD based on a newly introduced loss function. They concluded that the modified Williams method is comparatively better for the purpose of identifying the MTD, although each method has its own advantageous pattern.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
References
- 1.
Scheffé H. A method for judging all contrasts in the analysis of variance. Biometrika. 1953;40:87–104.
- 2.
Robertson T, Wright FT, Dykstra RL. Order restricted statistical inference. New York: John-Wiley Sons; 1988.
- 3.
Ruberg SJ. Contrasts for identifying the minimum effective dose. J Am Stat Assoc. 1989;84:816–822.
- 4.
Dunnett CW. A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control. J Am Stat Assoc. 1955;50:1096–1121.
- 5.
Williams DA. A test for differences between treatment means when several dose levels are compared with a zero dose control. Biometrics. 1971;27:103–117.
- 6.
Williams DA. The comparison of several dose levels with a dose zero control. Biometrics. 1972;28:661–670.
- 7.
Tamhane AC, Hochberg Y, Dunnett CW. Multiple test procedures for dose-finding. Biometrics. 1996;52:21–33.
- 8.
Hirotsu C. The cumulative Chi-squares method and a studentized maximal contrast method for testing an ordered alternative in a one-way analysis of variance model. Rep Stat Appl Rse JUSE. 1979;26:12–21.
- 9.
Kuriki S, Hirotsu C, Hayter JH. The multiple comparison procedure based on the maximal component of the cumulative Chi-squared statistic—Calculation of significance probability and its application to the comparison of dose levels. (In Japanese.) Jpn J Appl Stat. 1989;18:129–141.
- 10.
Marcus R. The powers of some tests of the equality of normal means against an ordered alternative. Biometrika. 1976;63:177–183.
- 11.
Marcus R, Peritz E, Gabriel KR. On closed testing procedures with special reference to ordered analysis of variance. Biometrika. 1976;63:655–660.
- 12.
Kishimoto J. MULTTEST, a procedure to obtain multiplicity adjusted p-value based on resampling. (In Japanese.) Bull Comp Stat Jpn. 1992;5:157–160.
- 13.
Hamada C, Kishimoto J. Application of SAS/MULTTEST to biostatistical data. (In Japanese.) Bull Comp Stat Jpn. 1994;7:91–96.
Author information
Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yoshimura, I., Wakana, A. & Hamada, C. A Performance Comparison of Maximum Contrast Methods to Detect Dose Dependency. Ther Innov Regul Sci 31, 423–432 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1177/009286159703100213
Published:
Issue Date:
Key Words
- Contrast
- Max-t method
- Minimum toxic dose
- One-way layout
- Williams method