Failure to Communicate: Medication Guide or Memory?

  • Louis A. MorrisEmail author
  • Morris S. Whitcup
  • Keith LaMattina
Drug Information


Four hundred individuals in the United States were surveyed via the Internet to determine how previous experience with a medication guide (MG) for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) influenced knowledge. Half of the respondents had received a prescription for an NSAID in the previous 6 months (during which time an MG was required). Independently, half were shown the NSAID MG and allowed to read or reread it prior to taking a knowledge test.

Those who read the MG prior to taking the knowledge test correctly answered about two-thirds of the questions regardless of previous use. Those who had used the medicine, but did not review the MG prior to the test, correctly answered about half of the questions. Those that neither used the medicine nor reviewed the MG correctly answered about one-fourth of the questions. The results indicate that there was an independent contribution of both experience using the medicine and MG readership.


Medication guide REMS Evaluation FDA Risk management 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Food and Drug Administration. Approved risk evaluation and mitigation strategies (REMS). (accessed November 12, 2010).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wolf MS. Davis TC, Shrank WH, Neuberger M, Parker RM. A critical review of FDA-approved medication guides. Patient Educ Couns. 2006; 62 (3):316–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shrank W. Avorn J. Educating patients about their medications: the potential and limitations of written drug information. Health Aff. 2007;26(3):731–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    LaPointe N. Pappas P, Deverka P. Anstrom K. Patient receipt and understanding of written information provided with isotretinoin and estrogen prescriptions. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(1):98–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bereby-Meyer Y, Meyer J, Budescu D. Decision making under internal uncertainty: the case of multiple-choice tests with different scoring rules. Acta Psychologica. 2003;112:207–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ng A. Chan A. Different methods of multiple-choice test: implications and design for further research. Proceedings of the International Multiconference of Engineers and Computer Scientists 2009, 2, March 18–20, 2009.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ebbinghaus H. Memory: A Contribution to Experimental Psychology. 1885. (accessed November 12, 2010).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stickgold R. Walker M. Memory consolidation and reconsolidation: what is the role of sleep? Trends Neurosci. 2005;28:408–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dudai Y. The neurobiology of consolidations, or, how stable is the engram? Ann Rev Psychol. 2004; 55:51–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Drug Information Association, Inc 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Louis A. Morris
    • 1
    Email author
  • Morris S. Whitcup
    • 2
  • Keith LaMattina
    • 2
  1. 1.Associates, IncUSA
  2. 2.ORC InternationalUSA

Personalised recommendations