Exploring the brand value-shareholder value nexus for consumer goods companies

  • Roger A. Kerin
  • Raj Sethuraman
Article
  • 1.2k Downloads

Abstract

It is generally claimed that brand names are a corporate asset with an economic value that creates wealth for a firm’s shareholders. However, the scholarly literature has neither provided a comprehensive theoretical basis for this claim nor documented an empirical relationship between brand value and shareholder value. This exploratory study describes a rationale for, and documents, the statistical strength and functional form of a brand value-shareholder value relationship for publicly held consumer goods companies in the United States. A theoretical argument supportive of a positive relationship between a firm’s accumulated brand value and market-to-book (M/B) ratio was empirically validated. However, even though firms with higher accumulated brand values have higher M/B ratios, the functional form of the relationship was found to be concave with decreasing returns to scale. Theoretical and managerial implications of these findings are outlined, as well as study limitations and directions for future research.

References

  1. Aaker, David A. 1991.Managing Brand Equity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  2. — 1996.Building Strong Brands. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  3. — and Robert Jacobson. 1994. “The Financial Information Content of Perceived Quality.”Journal of Marketing Research 31 (May): 191–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrew, David. 1997. “Brand Strength Analysis.” InBrand Valuation, 3rd ed. Ed. Raymond Perrier. London: Premier Books, 55–60.Google Scholar
  5. Badenhausen, Kurt. 1996. “Blind Faith.”Financial World 165 (July 8): 50–65.Google Scholar
  6. —. 1997. “Most Valuable Brands.”Financial World 166 (October 8): 62–70.Google Scholar
  7. Barth, Mary E. and Wayne R. Landsman. 1995. “Fundamental Issues Related to Using Fair Value Accounting for Financial Reporting.”Accounting Horizons 9 (December): 97–107.Google Scholar
  8. Barwise, Patrick, Christopher Higson, Andrew Likierman, and Paul Marsh. 1990. “Brands as ‘Separable Assets’.”Business Strategy Review 1 (Summer): 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. “Behind the Numbers.” 1996.Financial World 165 (July 8): 54–55.Google Scholar
  10. Biel, Alexander L. 1993. “Converting Image Into Equity.” InBrand Equity and Advertising. Eds. David A. Aaker and Alexander L. Biel. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 67–82.Google Scholar
  11. Birkin, Michael. 1994. “Assessing Brand Value.” InBrand Power. Ed. Paul Stobart. New York: New York University Press, 209–223.Google Scholar
  12. Copeland, Tom, Tim Keller, and Jack Murrin. 1994.Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Duncan, Tom and Sandra Moriarity. 1997.Driving Brand Value. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  14. Egginton, Don A. 1990. “Toward Some Principles for Intangible Asset Accounting.”Accounting and Business Research 20:193–205.Google Scholar
  15. Fama, Eugene F. 1970. “Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work.”Journal of Finance 25 (December): 383–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. — 1991. “Efficient Capital Markets: II.”Journal of Finance 46 (December): 1575–1617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. “TheFortune 500”. 1996.Fortune, April 29, pp. F1–F19.Google Scholar
  18. “TheFortune 500.” 1997.Fortune, April 28, pp. F1–F23.Google Scholar
  19. Glover, Christopher. 1997. “Alternative Methods of Brand Valuation.” InBrand Valuation, 3rd ed. Ed. Raymond Perrier. London: Premier Books, 19–24.Google Scholar
  20. Grand Metropolitan Annual Report 1996. 1997. London: Grand Metropolitan, PLC.Google Scholar
  21. Haigh, David and Raymond Perrier. 1997, “Valuation of Trademarks and Brand Names.” InBrand Valuation, 3rd ed. Ed. Raymond Perrier. London: Premier Books, 25–34.Google Scholar
  22. Hirschey, Mark and Jerry Weygandt. 1985. “Amortization Policy for Advertising and Research and Development Expenditures.”Journal of Accounting Research 23 (Spring): 326–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kapferer, Jean-Noël. 1997.Strategic Brand Management: Creating and Sustaining Brand Equity Long Term. 2nd ed. Dover, NH: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  24. Keller, Kevin Lane. 1998.Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  25. Kerin, Roger A., Vijay Mahajan, and P. Rajan Varadarajan. 1990.Contemporary Perspectives on Strategic Market Planning. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  26. Kuczmarski & Associates. 1996.Brand Asset Management for the 1990s. Chicago.Google Scholar
  27. Lane, Vicki and Robert Jacobson. 1995. “Stock Market Reactions to Brand Extension Announcements: The Effects of Brand Attitude and Familiarity.”Journal of Marketing 59 (January): 63–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lefton, Terry with Weston Anson. 1996. “How Much Is Your Brand Worth?”Brandweek, January 29, pp. 43–44.Google Scholar
  29. Lev, Baruch. 1997. “Announcing the Foundation of the Intangibles Research Center at the Vincent C. Ross Institute of Accounting Research.”Accounting Horizons 11 (March): 136–138.Google Scholar
  30. Lindenberg, Eric and Stephen Ross. 1981. “Tobin’sq Ratio and Industrial Organization.”Journal of Business 54 (January): 1–32.Google Scholar
  31. Longman, Kenneth A. 1995. “Valuing a Brand.”Journal of Brand Management 2 (April): 273–279.Google Scholar
  32. Meschi, Robert L. 1995. “Value Added: Refinements in Our Brand Valuation Methodology.”Financial World 164 (August 1): 52.Google Scholar
  33. Morck, R., A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny. 1988. “Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis.”Journal of Financial Economics 20 (2): 293–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Morris, Betsy. 1996. “The Brand’s the Thing.”Fortune, March 4, pp. 72–76.Google Scholar
  35. Murphy, John. 1989.Brand Valuation. London: Century Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  36. Owen, Stewart. 1993. “The Landor Image Power Survey: A Global Assessment of Brand Strength.” InBrand Equity and Advertising. Eds. David A. Aaker and Alexander L. Biel. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 11–30.Google Scholar
  37. Puri, Shaifoli. 1997. “Warning: Buying Philip Morris Could Be Habit-Forming.”Fortune, April 28, pp. 394, 396.Google Scholar
  38. Schlossberg, Howard. 1990. “Brand Value Can Be Worth More Than Physical Assets.”Marketing News, March 5, p. 6.Google Scholar
  39. Schuetze, Walter P. 1993. “What Is an Asset?”Accounting Horizons 7 (September): 66–70.Google Scholar
  40. Sheth, Jagdish N. and Rajendra S. Sisodia. 1995. “Feeling the Heat.”Marketing Management 4 (Fall): 8–23.Google Scholar
  41. Simon, Carol J. and Mary W. Sullivan. 1993. “The Measurement and Determinants of Brand Equity: A Financial Approach.”Marketing Science 12 (Winter): 28–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Smith, Geoffrey N. 1994. “What’s in a Name?”Financial World 163 (August 2): 6.Google Scholar
  43. Solomons, David. 1995. “Criteria for Choosing an Accounting Model.”Accounting Horizons 9 (March): 42–51.Google Scholar
  44. Srivastava, Rajendra K., Tassadduq A. Shervani, and Liam Fahey. 1998. “Market-Based Assets and Shareholder Value: A Framework for Analysis.”Journal of Marketing 62 (January): 2–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tobin, James. 1969. “A General Equilibrium Approach to Monetary Theory.”Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 1 (February): 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. —. 1978. “Monetary Policies and the Economy: The Transmission Mechanism.”Southern Economic Journal 37 (April): 421–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Varaiya, Nikhil, Roger A. Kerin, and David Weeks. 1987. “The Relationship Between Growth, Profitability, and Firm Value.”Strategic Management Journal 8 (September–October): 487–497.Google Scholar
  48. Yovovich, B. G. 1988. “What Is a Brand Really Worth?”Adweek’s Marketing Week, August 8, pp. 18–20, 24.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roger A. Kerin
    • 1
  • Raj Sethuraman
    • 1
  1. 1.Southern Methodist UniversityDallasUSA

Personalised recommendations