Advertisement

Identity, intended image, construed image, and gnreputation: An interdisciplinary framework and suggested terminology

  • Tom J. Brown
  • Peter A. Dacin
  • Michael G. Pratt
  • David A. Whetten
Article

Abstract

Many scholars across various academic disciplines are investigating the following questions: What do individuals know or believe about an organization? How does a focal organization (and/or other interested entity) develop, use, and/or change this information? and How do individuals respond to what they know or believe about an organization? Cross-disciplinary research that centers on these questions is desirable and could be enhanced if researchers identify and develop consistent terminology for framing these questions. The authors work toward that end by identifying four central ‘viewpoints’ of an organization and proposing labels to represent each of these viewpoints:identity, intended image, construed image, andreputation.

Keywords

identity image reputation corporate associations 

References

  1. Albert, Stuart, Blake E. Ashforth, and Jane E. Dutton, Eds. 2000.Academy of Management Review 25 (1).Google Scholar
  2. Albert, Stuart and David A. Whetten. 1985. “Organizational Identity.” InResearch in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 7. Eds. L. L. Cummings and B. M. Staw. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 263–295.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, John R. 1983. “A Spreading Activation Theory of Memory.”Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior 22:261–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashforth, Blake E. and Scott Johnson. 2001. “Which Hat to Wear? The Relative Salience of Multiple Identities in Organizational Contexts.” InSocial Identity Processes in Organizational Contexts. Eds. M. Hogg and D. J. Terry. Philadelphia: Psychology Press, 31–48.Google Scholar
  5. — and Fred A. Mael. 1989. “Social Identity Theory and the Organization.”Academy of Management Review 14(1): 20–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barich, Howard and Philip Kotler. 1991. “A Framework for Marketing Image Management.”Sloan Management Review 32 (2): 94–104.Google Scholar
  7. Berens, Guido, Cees B. M. van Riel, and Gerrit H. van Bruggen. 2005. “Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses: The Moderating Role of Corporate Brand Dominance.”Journal of Marketing 69 (July): 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhattacharya, C. B., Hayagreeva Rao, and Mary Ann Glynn. 1995. “Understanding the Bond of Identification: An Investigation of Its Correlates Among Art Museum Members.”Journal of Marketing 59 (4): 46–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. — and Sankar Sen. 2003. “Consumer-Company Identification: A Framework for Understanding Consumers— Relationship With Companies.”Journal of Marketing 67 (April): 76–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bolger, John F, Jr. 1959. “How to Evaluate Your Company Image.”Journal of Marketing 24 (October): 7–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Britt, Steuart Henderson. 1971. “The Right Marketing Mix for the Corporate Imagery Mix.”Business Horizons 14 (February): 87–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown, Tom J. 1998. “Corporate Associations in Marketing: Antecedents and Consequences.”Corporate Reputation Review 1 (3): 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. — and Peter A. Dacin. 1997. “The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses.”Journal of Marketing 61 (January): 68–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dacin, Peter A. and Tom J. Brown. 2002. “Corporate Identity and Corporate Associations: A Framework for Future Research.”Corporate Reputation Review 5 (2/3): 254–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davies, Gary, with Rosa Chun, Rui Vinhas da Silva, and Stuart Roper. 2003.Corporate Reputation and Competitiveness. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Dichter, Ernest. 1985. “What’s in an Image.”Journal of Consumer Marketing 2 (Winter): 75–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dutton, Jane E. and Janet M. Dukerich. 1991. “Keeping an Eye on the Mirror: Image and Identity in Organizational Adaptation.”Academy of Management Journal 34 (3): 517–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. —, and Celia V. Harquail. 1994. “Organizational Images and Member Identification.”Administrative Science Quarterly 39 (2): 239–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Enis, Ben M. 1967. “An Analytical Approach to the Concept of Image.”California Management Review 9 (Summer): 51–58.Google Scholar
  20. Fombrun, Charles J. 1996.Reputation: Realizing Value From the Corporate Image. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  21. Gatewood, Robert D., Mary A. Gowan, and Gary J. Lautenschlager. 1993. “Corporate Image, Recruitment Image, andInitial Job Choice Decisions.”Academy of Management Journal 36 (2): 414–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gioia, Dennis A., Majken Schultz, and Kevin G. Corley. 2000. “Organizational Identity, Image, andAdaptive Instability.”Academy of Management Review 25 (January): 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goldberg, Marvin E. and Jon Hartwick. 1990. “The Effects of Advertiser Reputation and Extremity of Advertising Claim on Advertising Effectiveness.”Journal of Consumer Research 17 (September): 172–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gronroos, Christian. 1984. “A Service Quality Model and Its Marketing Implications.”European Journal of Marketing 18 (4): 36–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Guedes, Jose and Roch Parayre. 1997. “Managerial Reputation and Divisional Sell-Offs: A Model and Empirical Test.”Journal of Banking and Finance 21 (8): 1985–2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gurhan-Canli, Zeynep and Rajeev Batra. 2004. “When Corporate Image Affects Product Evaluations: The Moderating Role of Perceived Risk.”Journal of Marketing Research 41 (May): 197–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hatch, Mary Jo and Majken Schultz. 1997. “Relations Between Organizational Culture, Identity and Image.”European Journal of Marketing 31 (5/6): 356–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. — and —. 2000. “Scaling the Tower of Babel: Relational Differences Between Identity, Image, andCulture.” InThe Expressive Organization. Eds. M. Schultz, M. J. Hatch, and M. Larsen. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 11–35.Google Scholar
  29. Hill, Edward W. 1962. “Corporate Images Are Not Stereotypes.”Journal of Marketing 26 (January): 72–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Keller, Kevin L., and David A. Aaker. 1998. “The Impact of Corporate Marketing on a Company’s Brand Extensions.”Corporate Reputation Review 1 (Summer): 356–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Leary, Mark R. and June Price Tangney. Eds. 2003.Handbook of Self and Identity. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  32. Markwick, Nigel and Chris Fill. 1997. “Towards a Framework for Managing Corporate Identity.”European Journal of Marketing 31 (5/6): 396–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moingeon, Bertrand, and Guillaume Soenen. Eds. 2002.Corporate and Organizational Identity: Integrating Strategy, Marketing, Communication and Organizational Perspectives. Chicago: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Neadle, Dexter. 1964. “The Relationship of Corporate Image to Product Behavior.”Public Opinion Quarterly 28 (Summer): 293–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Orlitzky, Marc, Frank L. Schmidt, and Sara L. Rynes. 2003. “Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis.”Organization Studies 24 (3): 403–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pratt, Michael G. 1998. “To Be or Not to Be: Central Questions in Organizational Identification.” InIdentity in Organizations: Developing Theory Through Conversations. Eds. D. Whetten and P. Godfrey. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 171–208.Google Scholar
  37. —. 2003. “Disentangling Collective Identity.” InIdentity Issues in Groups: Research in Managing Groups and Teams, Vol. 5. Eds. J. Polzer, E. Mannix, and M. Neale. Stamford, CT: Elsevier Science, 161–188.Google Scholar
  38. — and Peter O. Foreman. 2000a. “The Beauty of and Barriers to Organizational Theories of Identity.”Academy of Management Review 25 (January): 141–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. — and —. 2000b. “Classifying Managerial Responses to Multiple Organizational Identities.”Academy Management Review 25 (January): 18–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rindova, Violina P. 1997. “The Image Cascade and the Formation of Corporate Reputations.”Corporate Reputation Review 1 (Summer/Fall): 188–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Roberts, Peter W. and Grahame R. Dowling. 2002. “Corporate Reputation and Sustained Superior Financial Performance.”Strategic Management Journal 23 (December): 1077–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schultz, Majken, Mary Jo Hatch, and M. Larsen. Eds. 2000.The Expressive Organization. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Schwoerer, Catherine and Benson Rosen. 1989. “Effects of Employmentat-Will Policies and Compensation Policies on Corporate Image and Job Pursuit Intentions.”Journal of Applied Psychology 74 (4): 653–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Scott, Susanne G. and Vicki R. Lane. 2000. “A Stakeholder Approach to Organizational Identity.”Academy of Management Review 25 (January): 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sen, Sankar and C. B. Bhattacharya. 2001. “Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility.”Journal of Marketing Research 38 (May): 43–62.Google Scholar
  46. Smidts, Ale, Ad T. H. Pruyn, and Cees B. M. van Riel. 2001. “The Impact of Employee Communication and Perceived External Prestige on Organizational Identification.”Academy of Management Journal 49 (5): 1051–1062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. “Special Issue: Corporate Identity.” 1997.European Journal of Marketing 31 (5).Google Scholar
  48. van Riel, Cees B. M. 1997. “Research in Corporate Communication: An Overview of an Emerging Field.”Management Communication Quarterly 11 (November): 288–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. — and John M. T. Balmer. 1997. “Corporate Identity: The Concept, Its Measurement and Management.”European Journal of Marketing 31 (5/6): 340–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. van Rekom, Johan. 1997. “Deriving an Operational Measure of Corporate Identity.”European Journal of Marketing 31 (5/6): 410–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Whetten, David A. 1997. “Theory Development and the Study of Corporate Reputation.”Corporate Reputation Review 1 (Summer/Fall): 26–34.Google Scholar
  52. Whetten, David A. In press. “Albert and Whetten + 20 Years: Strengthening the Concept of Organizational Identity.”Journal of Management Inquiry.Google Scholar
  53. — and Paul C. Godfrey. Eds. 1998.Identity in Organizations: Building Theory Through Conversations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  54. — and Alison Mackey. 2002. “A Social Actor Conception of Organization and Identity and Its Implications for the Study of Organizational Reputation.”Business and Society 41 (4): 393–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tom J. Brown
    • 1
  • Peter A. Dacin
    • 2
  • Michael G. Pratt
    • 3
  • David A. Whetten
    • 4
  1. 1.Oklahoma State UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Queen’s UniversityKingstonCanada
  3. 3.University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbana-ChampaignUSA
  4. 4.Brigham Young UniversityProvoUSA

Personalised recommendations