Creating a firm-level dynamic capability through capitalizing on market orientation and innovativeness

  • Bulent Menguc
  • Seigyoung Auh


Drawing on the resource-based view of the firm, this study addresses the dynamic capability-generating capacity of market orientation on firm performance. Whereas prior literature has examined environmental turbulence as a contextual condition shaping the market orientation-firm performance relationship, this study takes an internal approach by focusing on existing stocks of resources within the firm while controlling for environmental conditions. A conceptual model is developed that explains how market orientation can be transformed into dynamic capability when complemented by transformational (reconfig-urational) constructs, such as innovativeness. The empirical results support the authors— theory that the effect of market orientation on firm performance is strengthened when market orientation is bundled together with internal complementary resources, such as innovativeness. The authors discuss the findings in the context of varying stages of the product life cycle and at different levels of market development.


resource-based view of the firm dynamic-capabilities perspective market orientation innovativeness firm performance 


  1. Aiken, Leona S. and Stephan G. West. 1991.Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Amit, Raphael and Paul I. Schoemaker. 1993. “Strategic Assets and Firm Rents.”Strategic Management Journal 14 (1): 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, James C. and David W. Gerbing. 1988. “Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two Step Approach.”Psychological Bulletin 103 (3): 411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ayers, Doug, Robert Dahlstrom, and Steven J. Skinner. 1997. “An Exploratory Investigation of Organizational Antecedents to New Product Success.”Journal of Marketing Research 34 (February): 107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bagozzi, Richard P. and Youjae Yi. 1988. “On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models.”Journal of Academy of Marketing Science 16 (1): 74–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baker, William E. and James M. Sinkula. 1999. “The Synergistic Effect of Market Orientation and Learning Orientation on Firm Performance.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 27 (4): 411–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barney, Jay B. 1991. “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage.”Journal of Management 17 (1): 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bharadwaj, Sundar G., P. R. Varadarajan, and John Fahy. 1993. “Sustainable Competitive Advantage in Service Industries: A Conceptual Model and Research Propositions.”Journal of Marketing 57 (October): 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Calantone, Roger J., S. Tamer Cavusgil, and Yushan Zhao. 2002. “Learning Orientation, Firm Innovation Capability, and Firm Performance.”Industrial Marketing Management 31 (6): 515–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carrillat, Francois A., Fernando Jaramillo, and William B. Locander. 2004. “Market-Driving Organizations: A Framework.”Academy of Marketing Science Review 2004 (5): 1–14.Google Scholar
  11. Cohen, Jacob and Patricia Cohen. 1983.Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  12. Day, George S. 1994. “The Capabilities of Market-Driven Firms.”Journal of Marketing 58 (October): 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Day, George S. and Robin Wensley. 1988. “Assessing Advantage: A Framework for Diagnosing Competitive Superiority.”Journal of Marketing 52 (April): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Desphande, Rohit, John U. Farley, and Frederick. E. Webster. 1993. “Corporate Culture, Market Orientation, and Innovativeness in Japanese Firms: A Quadrant Analysis.”Journal of Marketing 57 (January): 23–37.Google Scholar
  15. Dillman, Don A. 1978.Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Drucker, Peter F. 1954.The Practice of Management. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  17. Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. and Jeffrey A. Martin. 2000. “Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They?”Strategic Management Journal 21 (10/11): 1105–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fornell, Claes and David F. Larcker. 1981. “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error.”Journal of Marketing Research 18 (February): 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gerbing, David W. and James C. Anderson. 1988. “An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment.”Journal of Marketing Research 25 (May): 186–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Han, Jin K., Namwoon Kim, and Rajendra K. Srivastava. 1998. “Market Orientation and Organizational Performance: Is Innovation a Missing Link?”Journal of Marketing 62 (October): 30–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hult, G. Tomas M. and David J. Ketchen Jr. 2001. “Does Market Orientation Matter? A Test of the Relationship between Positional Advantage and Performance.”Strategic Management Journal 22 (9): 899–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hunt, Shelby D. and Robert M. Morgan. 1995. “The Comparative Advantage Theory of Competition.”Journal of Marketing 59 (April): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hurley, Robert F. and G. Tomas M. Hult. 1998. “Innovation, Market Orientation, and Firm Learning: An Integration and Empirical Examination.”Journal of Marketing 62 (July): 42–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jaworski, Bernard J. and Ajay Kohli. 1993. “Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences.”Journal of Marketing 52 (July): 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Johnson, Jean L., Ravipreet S. Sohi, and Rajdeep Grewal. 2004. “The Role of Relational Knowledge Stores in Interfirm Partnering.”Journal of Marketing 68 (3): 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jöreskog, K. G. and D. Sörbom. 1996.LISREL 8: User’s Reference Guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
  27. Kennedy, Karen N., Jerry R. Goolsby, and Eric J. Arnould. 2003. “Implementing a Customer Orientation: Extension of Theory and Application.”Journal of Marketing 67 (October): 67–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kohli, Ajay and Bernard J. Jaworski. 1990. “Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications.”Journal of Marketing 54 (April): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lado, Agustine A., Nancy G. Boyd, and Peter Wright. 1992. “A Competency Based Model of Sustainable Competitive Advantage: Toward a Conceptual Integration.”Journal of Management 18(1): 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lado, Agustine A. and Mary C. Wilson. 1994. “Human Resource Systems and Sustained Competitive Advantage: A Competency-Based Perspective.”Academy of Management Review 19 (4): 699–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Li, Haiyang and Kwaku Atuahene-Gima. 2001. “Product Innovation Strategy and the Performance of New Technology Ventures in China.”Academy of Management Journal 44 (6): 1123–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marinova, Detelina. 2004. “Actualizing Innovation Effort: The Impact of Market Knowledge Diffusion in a Dynamic System of Competition.”Journal of Marketing 68 (July): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Matsuno, Ken, John T. Mentzer, and Aysegül Özsomer. 2002. “The Effects of Entrepreneurial Proclivity and Market Orientation on Business Performance.”Journal of Marketing 66 (July): 18–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Moorman, Christine and Roland Rust. 1999. “The Role of Marketing.”Journal of Marketing 63 (Special Issue): 80–197.Google Scholar
  35. Moorman, Christine and Rebecca J. Slotegraaf. 1999. “The Contingency Value of Complementary Capabilities in Product Development.”Journal of Marketing Research 36 (May): 239–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Narver, John C. and Stanley F. Slater. 1990. “The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability.”Journal of Marketing 54 (October): 20–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Narver, John C. and Stanley F. Slater. 1994. “Does Competitive Environment Moderate the Market Orientation-Performance Relationship?”Journal of Marketing 58 (January): 46–55.Google Scholar
  38. Narver, John C, Stanley F. Slater, and Douglas L. MacLachlan. 2004. “Responsive and Proactive Market Orientation and New-Product Success.”Journal of Product Innovation Management 21 (5): 334–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Neter, John, William Wasserman, and Michael H. Kutner. 1985.Applied Linear Statistical Models: Regression, Analysis of Variance, and Experimental Design. Homewood IL: Richard D. Irwin.Google Scholar
  40. Oliver, Richard L. 2000. “The Kano Approach to Customer Delight.” Paper presented at the American Marketing Association, Frontiers in Services Conference, October, Vanderbilt University.Google Scholar
  41. Pearce, John, Keith D. Robbins, and Richard B. Robinson. 1987. “The Impact of Grand Strategy and Planning Formality on Financial Performance.”Strategic Management Journal 8 (2): 125–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Peteraf, Margaret A. and Mark E. Bergen. 2003. “Scanning Dynamic Competitive Landscapes: A Market-Based and Resource-Based Framework.”Strategic Management Journal 24 (10): 1027–1041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Peters, Thomas J. 1984. “Strategy Follows Structure: Developing Distinctive Skills.”California Management Review 26 (Spring): 111–125.Google Scholar
  44. Phillips, Lynn W. 1981. “Assessing Measurement Error in Key Informant Reports: A Methodological Note on Organizational Analysis in Marketing.”Journal of Marketing Research 18 (November): 395–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Porter, Michael E. 1985.Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  46. Porter, Michael E. 1991. “Towards a Dynamic Theory of Strategy.”Strategic Management Journal 12 (Winter Special Issue): 95–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Reed, Richard and Robert J. DeFillippi. 1990. “Causal Ambiguity, Barriers to Imitation, and Sustainable Competitive Advantage.”Academy of Management Review 15 (1): 88–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rust, Roland T., Christian Moorman, and Peter R. Dickson. 2002. “Getting Return on Quality.”Journal of Marketing 66 (October): 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sitkin, Sim, Kathleen M. Sutcliffe, and Roger G. Schroeder. 1994. “Distinguishing Control from Learning in Total Quality Management: A Contingency Perspective.”Academy of Management Review 19 (3): 537–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Slater, Stanley F. and John C. Narver. 1995. “Market Orientation and the Learning Organization.”Journal of Marketing 59 (July): 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Teece, David J. 1986. “Profiting from Technological Guideposts and Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy.”Research Policy 15 (6): 285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Teece, David J., Gary Pisano, and Amy Shuen. 1997. “Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management.”Strategic Management Journal 18 (7): 509–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. nerfelt, Birger. 1984. “A Resource-Based View of the Firm.”Strategic Management Journalz 5 (2): 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zaltman, Gerald, Robert Duncan, and Johnny Holbek. 1973.Innovations and Firms. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bulent Menguc
    • 1
  • Seigyoung Auh
    • 2
  1. 1.Brock UniversityCanada
  2. 2.Yonsei UnivesitySouth Korea

Personalised recommendations