Advertisement

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

, Volume 33, Issue 4, pp 486–503 | Cite as

Blowing bubbles: Heuristics and biases in the run-up of stock prices

  • Joseph Johnson
  • Gerard J. Tellis
Article

Abstract

Ads of stocks and mutual funds typically tout their past performance, despite a disclosure that past performance does not guarantee future returns. Are consumers motivated to buy or sell based on past performance of assets? More generally, do consumers (wrongly) use sequential information about past performance of assets to make suboptimal decisions? Use of this heuristic leads to two well-known biases: the hot hand and the gambler’s fallacy. This study proposes a theory of hype that integrates these two biases; that a positive run could inflate prices, while a negative run could depress them, although the pattern could reverse on extended runs. Tests on two experiments and one event study of stock purchases strongly suggest that consumers dump “losers” and buy “winners.” The latter phenomenon could lead to hyped-up prices on the stock market for winning stocks. The authors discuss the managerial, public policy, and research implications of the results.

Keywords

heuristics and biases financial products behavioral decision theory judgment and decision making 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aaker, David A. and Robert Jacobson. 1994. “The Financial Information Content of Perceived Quality.”Journal of Marketing Research 31: 191–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agarwal, Jagdish and Wagner A. Kamakura. 1995. “The Economic Worth of Celebrity Endorsers: An Event Study Analysis.”Journal of Marketing 59:56–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andreassen, Paul B. 1988. “Explaining the Price-Volume Relationship: The Difference Between Price Changes and Changing Prices.”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 41:371–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barberis, N., A. Shliefer, and R. Vishny. 1998. “A Model of Investor Sentiment.”Journal of Financial Economics 49 (3): 307–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Camerer, Coilin F. 1989. “Does the Basketball Market Believe in the ‘Hot Hand’?”American Economic Review 79 (5): 1257–1261.Google Scholar
  6. Campbell, J. Y., Andrew W. Lo, and A. Craig MacKinlay. 1996.The Econometrics of Financial Markets. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Chaney, Paul K., Timothy M. Devinney, and Russell S. Winer. 1991. “The Impact of New Product Introductions on the Market Value of Firms.”Journal of Business 64 (4): 573–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chopra, Navin, Josef Lakonishok, and Jay Ritter. 1993. “Measuring Abnormal Performance: Do Stocks Overreact?” InAdvances in Behavioral Finance, Ed. Richard H. Thaler. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 265–302.Google Scholar
  9. Cooper, Michael. 1999. “Filter Rules Based on Price and Volume in Individual Security Overreaction.”Review of Financial Studies 12 (4): 901–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Craik, F. I. M. and R. S. Lockhart. 1972. “Levels of Processing: A Framework for Memory Research.”Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 11:671–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DeBondt, Werner. 1993. “Betting on Trends: Intuitive Forecasts of Financial Risk and Return.”International Journal of Forecasting 9:355–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. —. 1998. “A Portrait of the Individual Investor.”European Economic Review 42:831–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. — and Richard Thaler. 1985. “Does the Stock Market Overreact?”Journal of Finance 40:793–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. — and —. 1987. “Further Evidence on Investor Overreaction and Stock Market Seasonality.”Journal of Finance 42:557–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. — and —. 1989. “A Mean Reverting Walk Down Wall Street.”Journal of Economic Perspectives 3 (1): 189–202.Google Scholar
  16. — and —. 1990. “Do Security Analysts Overreact?”American Economic Review 80 (2): 52–57.Google Scholar
  17. Dhar, Ravi and Alok Kumar. 2001. “A Non-Random Walk Down the Main Street: Impact of Price Trends on Trading Decisions of Individual Investors.” Working paper. Yale University, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
  18. Einhom, H. J., and R. Hogarth. 1978. “Confidence in Judgement: Persistence in the Illusion of Validity.”Psychological Review 85 (5): 395–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fama, Eugene F. 1970. “Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work.”Journal of Finance 25 (2): 383–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. —. 1991. “Efficient Capital Markets II.”Journal of Finance 25:383–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. —. 1998. “Efficiency Survives the Attack of the Anomalies.”GSB Chicago (Winter):14–16.Google Scholar
  22. —, Lawrence Fisher, Michael Jensen, and Richard Roll. 1969. “The Adjustment of Stock Prices to New Information.”International Economic Review 10:1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. — and Kenneth R. French. 2000. “Forecasting Profitability and Earnings.”Journal of Business 73 (2): 161–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gilovich, Thomas R., Robert Vallone, and Amos Tversky. 1985. “The Hot Hand in Basketball: On the Misperception of Random Sequences.”Cognitive Psychology 17:295–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Goldenberg, Jacob, Barak Libai, and Eitan Muller. 2002. “Riding the Saddle: How Cross-Market Communication Creates a Major Slump in Sales.”Journal of Marketing 66 (April): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jegadeesh, Narasimhan and Sheridan Titman. 1993. “Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency.”Journal of Finance 48:65–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jensen, M. 1978. “Some Anomalous Evidence Regarding Market Efficiency.”Journal of Financial Economics 6:95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnson, Joseph, Gerard J. Tellis, and Deborah J. Macinnis. Forthcoming. “Losers, Winners and Biased Trades.”Journal of Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  29. Hayes-Roth, B. and F. Hayes-Roth. 1979. “A Cognitive Model of Planning.”Cognitive Science 3:275–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Isen, Alice M. 1989. “Some Ways in Which Affect Influences Cognitive Processes: Implications for Advertising and Consumer Behavior.” InCognitive and Affective Responses to Advertising. Eds. Patricia Caffereta and Alice M. Tybout. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 91–118.Google Scholar
  31. Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky. 1972. “Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness.”Cognitive Psychology 3:430–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Karpoff, Jonathan M. 1986. “A Theory of Trading Volume.”Journal of Finance 51 (5): 1069–1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lakonishok, Josef, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert Vishny. 1994. “Contrarian Investments, Extrapolation, and Risk.”Journal of Finance 49 (5): 1541–1578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lane, Vicki and Robert Jacobson. 1995. “Stock Market Reactions to Brand Extension Announcements: The Effects of Brand Attitude and Familiarity.”Journal of Marketing 59 (January): 63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. La Porta, Rafael, Josef Lakonishok, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert Vishny. 1994. “Good News for Value Socks: Further Evidence on Market Efficiency.”Journal of Finance 52:859–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Odean, Terrance. 1998. “Are Investors Reluctant to Realize Their Losses?”Journal of Finance 53 (5): 1775–1798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Raghubir, Priya and Sanjiv Ranjan Das. 1999. “The Psychology of Financial Decision Making: A Case for Theory-Driven Experimental Enquiry.”Financial Analyst’s Journal 55 (6): 56–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Samuelson, Paul A. 1965. “Proof That Properly Anticipated Prices Fluctuate Randomly.”Industrial Management Review 6:41–50.Google Scholar
  39. Shefrin, Hersh. 2000.Beyond Greed and Fear. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  40. — and Meir Statman. 1985. “The Disposition to Sell Winners Too Early and Ride Losers Too Long: Theory and Evidence.”Journal of Finance 40:777–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shiller, Robert J. 1990. “Speculative Prices and Popular Models.” {tJournal of Economic Perspectives} 4 (2): 55–65.Google Scholar
  42. Subramanyam, K. R. 1996. “The Pricing of Discretionary Accruals.”Journal of Accounting and Economics 22:249–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Swaminathan, Bhaskaran and Charles M. C. Lee. 2000. “Do Stock Prices Overreact to Earnings News.” Working paper. Cornell University.Google Scholar
  44. Tversky, Amos and Thomas Gilovich. 1989. “The Cold Facts About the ‘Hot Hand’ in Basketball.”Chance: New Directions for Statistics and Computing 2 (1): 16–21.Google Scholar
  45. — and Daniel Kahneman. 1971. “Belief in the Law of Small Numbers.”Psychological Bulletin 76 (July–December): 105–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Van Raaij, W. 1991. “The Formation and Use of Expectations in Consumer Decision Making.” InHandbook of Consumer Behavior. Eds. Thomas S. Robertson and Harold H Kassarjian. Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice Hall, 401–418.Google Scholar
  47. Zeckhauser, Richard, Daryll Hendricks, and Jayendu Patel. 1993. “Hot Hands in Mutual Funds: Short-Run Persistence of Performance, 1974-88.”Journal of Finance 48 (1): 93–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph Johnson
    • 1
  • Gerard J. Tellis
    • 2
  1. 1.University of MiamiMiamiUSA
  2. 2.University of Southern CaliforniaLos Angeles

Personalised recommendations