Advertisement

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

, Volume 30, Issue 3, pp 217–228 | Cite as

The effects of job autonomy, customer demandingness, and trait competitiveness on salesperson learning, self-efficacy, and performance

  • Guangping Wang
  • Richard G. Netemyer
Article

Abstract

Although self-efficacy has been demonstrated to be positively associated with performance-related variables, few studies have looked at its possible antecedents in the context of personal selling. Applying social cognitive theory, this study posits that while self-efficacy positively affects performance, the salesperson's learning effort directly affects self-efficacy. Furthermore, two task-related factors (perceived job autonomy and customer demandingness) and one individual difference variable (trait competitiveness) are proposed to affect salesperson learning effort and self-efficacy. Two empirical studies show consistent results regarding the positive effects of learning on efficacy and efficacy on performance as well as the influences of three exogenous constructs on learning and efficacy. Implications and future research directions are discussed.

Keywords

Real Estate Social Cognitive Theory Customer Demandingness Learning Effort Sales Performance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, E., and R. Oliver. 1987. “Perspectives on Behavior-Based Versus Outcome-Based Salesforce Control Systems.”Journal of Marketing 51 (October): 76–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. C. and D. W. Gerbing. 1988. “Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach.”Psychological Bulletin 103 (3): 411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. 1977.Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  4. — 1986.Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social-Cognitive View. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  5. — 1997.Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  6. — and D. Cervone. 1986. “Differential Engagement of Self-Reactive Influences in Cognitive Motivation.”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 38: 92–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. — and R. E. Wood. 1989. “Effect of Perceived Controllability and Performance Standards on Self-Regulation of Complex Decision-Making.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56: 805–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bollen, K. A. 1989.Structural Equations With Latent Variables. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. Breaugh, J. A. 1985. “The Measurement of Work Autonomy.”Human Relations 38 (6): 551–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. — 1998. “The Development of a New Measure of Global Work Autonomy.”Educational and Psychological Measurement 58 (1): 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brewer, G. 1994. “Mind Reading.”Sales and Marketing Management 146 (May): 82–88.Google Scholar
  12. Brown, S. P. and R. A. Peterson. 1994. “The Effect of Effort on Sales Performance and Job Satisfaction.”Journal of Marketing 58: 70–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. —, W. L. Cron, and J. W. Slocum Jr. 1998. “Effects of Trait Competitiveness and Perceived Intraorganizational Competition on Salesperson Goal Setting and Performance.”Journal of Marketing 62 (October): 88–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Browne, M. W. and R. Cudeck. 1993. “Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit.” InTesting Structural Equation Models. Eds. A. Bollen and J. S. Long. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 136–162.Google Scholar
  15. Carsrud, A. L. and K. W. Olm. 1986. “The Success of Male and Female Entrepreneurs: A Comparative Analysis of the Effects of Multi-Dimensional Achievement Motivation.” InManaging Take-Off in Fast Growth Companies. Eds. R. W. Smiler and R. L. Kuhn. New York: Praeger, 147–161.Google Scholar
  16. Challagalla, G. N. and T. A. Shervani. 1996. “Dimensions and Types of Supervisory Control: Effects on Salesperson Performance and Satisfaction.”Journal of Marketing 60(January): 89–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chowdhury, J., 1993. “The Motivational Impact of Sales Quotas on Effort.”Journal of Marketing Research 30(February): 28–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Churchill, G. A., Jr., N. M. Ford, S. W. Hartley, and O. C. Walker Jr. 1985. “The Determinants of Salesperson Performance: A Meta-Analysis.”Journal of Marketing Research 22: 103–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clark, L. A. and D. Watson. 1995. “Constructing Validity: Basic Issues in Scale Development.”Psychological Assessment 7(3): 309–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dillon, W. A., A. Kumar, and N. Mulani. 1987. “Offending Estimates in Covariance Structure Analysis: Comments on the Causes and Solutions to Heywood Cases.”Psychological Bulletin 101: 126–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fornell, C. and D. F. Larcker. 1981. “Evaluating Structural Equation Models With Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error.”Journal of Marketing Research 18: 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Friedman, M. and R. Rosenman. 1974.Type A Behavior and Your Heart. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  23. Gist, M. E. and T. R. Mitchell. 1992. “Self-Efficacy: A Theoretical Analysis of Its Determinants and Malleability.”Academy of Management Review 17(2): 183–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hackman, J. R. and G. R. Oldham. 1976. “Motivation Through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory.”Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance 16: 250–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hu, L. and P. M. Bentler. 1995. “Evaluating Model Fit.” InStructural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications. Ed. R. H. Hoyle. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 76–99.Google Scholar
  26. Hurtz, G. M. and J. J. Donovan. 2000. “Personality and Job Performance: The Big Five Revisited.”Journal of Applied Psychology 85: 869–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Karasek, R. A. 1979. “Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign.”Administrative Science Quarterly 24: 285–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kohli, A. K., T. A. Shervani, and G. N. Challagalla. 1998. “Learning and Performance Orientation of Salespeople: The Role of Supervisors.”Journal of Marketing Research 35(May): 263–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Landrum, G. N. 1993.Profiles of Genius: Thirteen Creative Men Who Changed the World. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  30. Lee, C. and D. J. Gillen. 1989. “Relationship of Type A Behavior Pattern, Self-Efficacy Perceptions on Sales Performance.”Journal of Organizational Behavior 10: 75–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Li, T. and R. J. Calantone. 1998. “The Impact of Market Knowledge Competence on New Product Advantage: Conceptualization and Empirical Examination.”Journal of Marketing 62(4): 13–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Maurer, T. J. and H. R. Pierce. 1998. “A Comparison of Likert Scale and Traditional Measures of Self-Efficacy.”Journal of Applied Psychology 83: 324–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McClelland, D. C., J. W. Atkinson, R. A. Clark, and E. L. Lowell. 1953.The Achievement Motive. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  34. Mount, M. K. and M. R. Barrick. 1995. “The Big Five Personality Dimensions: Implications for Research and Practice in Human Resources Management.”Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management 13: 153–200.Google Scholar
  35. Mowen, John C., Janet E. Keith, Stephen W. Brown, and Donald W. Jackson Jr. 1985. “Utilizing Effort and Task Difficulty Information in Evaluating Salespeople.”Journal of Marketing Research 22(May): 185–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Senge, P. M. 1990.The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday/Currency.Google Scholar
  37. Sharma, A. and D. M. Lambert. 1984. “How Accurate Are Salespersons' Perceptions of Their Customers?”Industrial Marketing Management 23: 357–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Spector, P. E. 1992. “A Consideration of the Validity and Meaning of Self-Report Measures of Job Conditions.” InInternational Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, vol. 7. Eds. C. L. Cooper and I. T. Robertson. New York: John Wiley, 123–151.Google Scholar
  39. Spence, J. T. and R. L. Helmreich. 1983. “Achievement-Related Motives and Behavior.” InAchievement and Achievement Motives: Psychological and Sociological Approaches. Ed. J. T. Spence. San Francisco: Freeman, 10–74.Google Scholar
  40. Spiro, R. L. and B. A. Weitz. 1990. “Adaptive Selling: Conceptualization. Measurement, and Nomological Validity.”Journal of Marketing Research 27(February): 61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Spreizer, G. M. 1995. “Psychological Empowerment in the Workplace: Dimensions, Measurement, and Validation.”Academy of Management Journal 38(5): 1442–1465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stajkovic, A. D. and F. Luthans. 1998. “Self-Efficacy and Work-Related Performance: A Meta-Analysis.”Psychological Bulletin 124: 240–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Steenkamp, J. E. M., and H. Baumgartner. 1998. “Assessing Measurement Invariance in Cross-National Consumer Research.”Journal of Consumer Research 25(1): 78–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sujan, H., B. A. Weitz, and N. Kumar. 1994. “Learning Orientation, Working Smart, and Effective Selling.”Journal of Marketing 58 (July): 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Taylor, M. S., E. A. Locke, C. Lee, and M. E. Gist. 1984. “Type A Behavior and Faculty Research Productivity: What Are the Mechanisms?”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 34: 402–418.Google Scholar
  46. Tyagi, P. K. 1985. “Relative Importance of Key Job Dimensions and Leadership Behavior in Motivating Salesperson Work Performance.”Journal of Marketing 49(Summer): 76–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vinchur, A. J., J. S. Schippmann, F. S. Switzer III, and P. L. Roth. 1998. “A Meta-Analytic Review of Predictors of Job Performance for Salespeople.”Journal of Applied Psychology 83(4): 586–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Weiss, H. 1990. “Learning Theory and Industrial and Organizational Psychology.” InHanbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2nd ed., vol. 1. Eds. M. D. Dunnette and L. M. Hough. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 171–222.Google Scholar
  49. Williams, L. J. and S. E. Anderson. 1994. “An Alternative Approach to Methods Effects by Using Latent Variable Models: Applications in Organizational Behavior Research.”Journal of Applied Psychology 79(3): 323–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guangping Wang
    • 1
  • Richard G. Netemyer
    • 2
  1. 1.Pennsylvania State University at HazletonHazletonUSA
  2. 2.University of VirginiaUSA

Personalised recommendations