Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessing Attitudes about Genetic Testing as a Component of Continuing Medical Education

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Academic Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the attitudes among mental health professionals regarding the use of genetic testing.

Methods

Psychiatrists and other mental health professionals (N=41) who were enrolled in a week-long course in psychiatric genomics completed questionnaires before and after the course designed to assess how diagnostic genetic tests should be used and the value of pharmacogenomic testing for clinical practice.

Results

Only 5% of the course participants knew their genotype for the CYP 2D6 and CYP 2C19 genes at the time they participated in the course. However, after completing the course, 95% of the participants who had not been tested responded that they would be tested if genotyping was provided at no cost. Most of the participants reported that adults have the right to know their genotypes. Specifically, a majority of participants also reported that adults should have access to information regarding their genetic predispositions to both Huntington’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease. A majority of participants believed that parents had the right to know the genotypes of their children and that adolescents should have access to their genotypes if they had parental permission or were emancipated minors. However, only 29% of participants reported that children ages 6 to 12 should have access to the results of their genotyping.

Conclusion

Continuing medical educational programs can provide an effective and informative opportunity to develop a better understanding of contemporary perspectives of practicing clinicians. Despite some variability in beliefs regarding the implications of age and diagnosis for making genetic testing decisions, a majority of course participants reported that they would choose to be genotyped for two drug metabolizing enzyme genes. Furthermore, they felt that, in most circumstances, adults should be permitted to know their genotype.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weinshilboum R: Inheritance and drug response. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 529–537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Qiu C, Kivipelto M, Aguero-Torres H, et al: Risk and protective effects of the APOE gene towards Alzheimer’s disease in the Kungsholmen project: variation by age and sex. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004; 75: 828–833

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mesier B, Dunn S: Psychological impact of genetic testing for Huntington’s disease: An update of the literature. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000; 69: 574–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Robins W, Backman L, Lundin A, et al: High suicidal ideation in persons testing for Huntington’s disease. Acta Neurol Scand 2000; 102: 150–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Paulsen J, Hoth K, Nehl C, et al: Critical periods of suicide risk in Huntington’s disease. Am J Psychiatry 2005; 162: 725–731

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mrazek, M., Koenig, B., Skime, M. et al. Assessing Attitudes about Genetic Testing as a Component of Continuing Medical Education. Acad Psychiatry 31, 447–451 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.31.6.447

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.31.6.447

Keywords

Navigation