Abstract
Objective
Recovery is emerging as a guiding influence in mental health service delivery and transformation. As a consequence, the expectations and curricular needs of trainees (as future stakeholders in a transformed, recovery-oriented system) are now of considerable importance.
Method
To this end, residentled focus groups were held at the Medical College of Georgia to obtain perceptions of the Recovery Model. Certified Peer Support Specialists (CPSS) attended and topics covered were the Recovery Model, the CPSS training curriculum and developing a Wellness Recovery Action Plan (WRAP) with consumers.
Results
Advantages and disadvantages of the Recovery model were discussed, with residents generally expressing cautious optimism regarding implementation of these principles, yet concern regarding the potential for diminishing confidence and support for traditional professional services. All residents indicated an interest in obtaining more information about the Recovery Model, including how to incorporate WRAPS and the role of CPSS in Recovery. Almost half of the residents selected a recovery-oriented workshop as the best method for further education about these concepts, with less support for other options of didactic handouts and expert lecture.
Conclusions
Future efforts should be directed at implementing recovery curricula into resident education and evaluating the changes in resident knowledge, attitude toward recovery, and plans to implement recovery-oriented principles into their own professional practice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Davidson L, Chinman M, Kloos B, et al: Peer support among individuals with severe mental illness: a review of the evidence. Clinical Psychology 1999; 6: 165–187
Liberman R, Kopelowicz A: Recovery from schizophrenia: a concept in search of research. Psychiatr Services 2005; 56: 735–742
Torgalsboen A, Bjorn R: Lessons learned from three studies of recovery from schizophrenia. Int Rev of Psychiatry 2002; 14: 312–317
Andreasen N, Carpenter W, Kane J, et al: Remission in schizophrenia: proposed criteria and rationale for consensus. Am J Psychiatry 2005; 162: 441–449
Davidson L, Strauss JS: Sense of self in recovery from severe mental illness. Br J Med Psychol 1992; 65: 131–145
Davidson L, O’Connell M, Tondora J, et al: Recovery in serious mental illness: paradigm shift or shibboleth? Available from: http://www.dmhas.state.ct.us/recovery/paradigmshift.pdf
New Freedom Commission on Mental Health. Achieving the promise: Transforming mental health in America. Final Report. US Department of Health and Human Services. Pub. number SMA-03-3832. Rockville, MD, Department of Health and Human Services, 2003
Anthony W, Rogers ES, Farkas M: Research on evidence-based practices: future directions in an era of recovery. Community Ment Health J 2003; 39: 101–114
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Mental Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD, Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse, and Mental Health Services Administration, 1999. Available from: http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/mentalhealth/chapter1/sec4.html
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This report was prepared as a part of an educational partnership between the Georgia Department of Human Resources (Office of Consumer Relations, Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Addictive Diseases) and the Medical College of Georgia Department of Psychiatry and Health Behavior.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Buckley, P., Bahmiller, D., Kenna, C.A. et al. Resident Education and Perceptions of Recovery in Serious Mental Illness: Observations and Commentary. Acad Psychiatry 31, 435–438 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.31.6.435
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.31.6.435