Abstract
Objective
Electronic medical records (EMRs) are becoming prevalent and integral tools for residents and medical students. EMRs can integrate point-of-service information delivery within the context of patient care. Though it may be an educational tool, little is known about how EMR technology is currently used for medical learners.
Method
The authors reviewed the available published literature about the impact of EMRs on learners, including learners’ attitudes about EMRs educational uses of EMRs and the potential effects of EMRs on learners’ daily work.
Results
Research on EMRs for education is in its infancy. The authors found fewer than 50 articles with evidence on their use in medical education. The applications to education included point-of-care knowledge delivery, computerized clinical decision support systems, profiling of learner experiences, and daily workflow management. The evidence was mainly derived from single institution studies and occasionally across disciplines.
Conclusions
EMRs have great potential as an educational tool, but thus far, strong data to support their use for this are lacking. As the usage of EMRs rises, educators must continue to study how best to use technology as an educational tool and as a tool to improve the daily work of residents and medical students.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC, National Academy Press, 2001
Ash JS, Gorman PN, Seshadri V, et al: Computerized physician order entry in U.S. hospitals: results of a 2002 survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004; 11: 95–99
Gans D, Kralewski J, Hammons T, et al: Medical groups’ adoption of electronic health records and information systems. Heath Aff 2005; 24: 1323–1333
Aaronson JW, Murphy-Cullen CL, Chop WM, et al: Electronic medical records: the family practice experience. Fam Med 2001; 33: 128–132
Hier DB, Rothschild A, LeMaistre A, et al: Differing faculty and housestaff acceptance of an electronic health record. Int J Med Inform 2005; 74: 657–662
O’Connell RT, Cho C, Shah N, et al: Take note(s): differential HER satisfaction with two implementations under one roof. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004; 11: 43–49
Stair TO, Howell JM: Effect on medical education of computerized physician order entry. Acad Med 1995; 70: 543
Patterson R, Harasym P: Educational instruction on a hospital information system for medical students during their surgical rotations. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2001; 8: 111–116
Stair TO, Howell JM: Effect on medical education of computerized physician order entry. Acad Med 1995; 70: 543
Speedie SM, Niewoehner C: The Minnesota Virtual Clinic: Using a Simulator EMR to Teach Medical Students Medical Science and Clinical Concepts. AMIA Symposium Proceedings, 2003
Muma RD, Neibuhr BR: Simulated patients in an electronic medical record. Acad Med 1997; 72: 72
Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H, et al: Effect of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA 2005; 293: 1223–1238
Rollman BL, Hanusa BH, Gilbert T, et al: The electronic medical record: a randomized trial of its impact on primary care physicians’ initial management of major depression. Arch Intern Med 2001; 161: 189–197
Tsai TL, Fridsma DB, Gatti G: Computer decision support as a source of interpretation error: the case of electrocardiograms. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003; 10: 478–483
Lee JS, Sineff SS, Sumner W: Validation of electronic student encounter logs in an emergency medicine clerkship. Proc AMIA Symp 2002;:425-429
Sequist TD, Singh S, Periera AG, et al: Use of an electronic medical record to profile the continuity clinic experiences of primary care residents. Acad Med 2005; 80: 390–394
Johnson VK, Michener JL: Tracking medical students’ clinical experiences with a computerized medical records system. Fam Med 1994; 26: 421–424
Swanson T, Dostal J, Eichhorst B, et al: Recent implementations of electronic medical records in four family practice residency programs. Acad Med 1997; 72: 607–612
Petersen LA, Brennan TA, O’Neil AC, et al: Does house staff discontinuity of care increase the risk for preventable adverse events? Ann Intern Med 1994; 121: 866–872
Petersen LA, Orav EJ, Teich JM, et al: Using a computerized sign-out process to improve continuity of inpatients and prevent adverse events. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 1998; 24: 77–87
Van Eaton EG, Horvath KD, Lober WB, et al: A randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of a computerized rounding and sign-out system on continuity of care and resident work hours. J Am Coll Surg 2005; 200: 538–545
Van Eaton EG, Horvath KD Lober WB, et al: Organizing the transfer of patient care information: the development of a computerized resident sign-out system. Surgery 2004; 136: 5–13
Mekhjian HS, Kumar RR, Kuehn L, et al: Immediate benefits realized following implementation of physician order entry at an academic medical center. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2002; 9: 529–553
Overhage JM, Perkins S, Tierney WM, et al: Controlled trial of direct physician order entry: effects on physicians’ time utilization in ambulatory primary care internal medicine practices. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2001; 8: 361–371
Shu K, Boyle D, Spurr C, et al: Comparing time spent writing orders on paper and physician computer order entry. Medinfo 2001; 10: 1207–1211
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.31.6.492.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Keenan, C.R., Nguyen, H.H. & Srinivasan, M. Electronic Medical Records and Their Impact on Resident and Medical Student Education. Acad Psychiatry 30, 522–527 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.30.6.522
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.30.6.522