Skip to main content
Log in

Residency Programs and Psychotherapy Competencies: A Survey of Chief Residents

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Academic Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To survey chief residents’ opinion about various aspects of psychotherapy competency determination.

Methods

Chief residents of various psychiatry residency programs were surveyed.

Results

One hundred two chief residents were surveyed. Seventy two (70.58%) completed the survey. Eighty four percent of the respondents reported that they were aware of the competencies. The number of patients required for competency determination in five areas of psychotherapy varied widely among the programs. Global assessment by psychotherapy supervisors was the most commonly used method of competency determination (61%). Nineteen (26%) chief residents opined that not all the faculty members involved in teaching and assessing competencies are qualified to do so. Only 23 (31%) of respondents reported that competency criteria were well integrated into the residency curriculum.

Conclusion

The little consistency in psychotherapy competency determination across various programs, the differential preparedness of programs for competencies and the lack of consistent integration of competencies into residency curricula call for development and implementation of more uniform assessment methods. This variability also calls into question the decision to establish a standard in five areas of psychotherapy competency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yager J, Kay J, Mellman L: Assessing psychotherapy competence: A beginning. Acad Psychiatry 2003; 27: 125–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mellman LA, Beresin E: Psychotherapy competencies: development and implementation. Acad Psychiatry 2003; 27: 149–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Manring J, Beitman BD, Dewan MJ: Evaluating competence in psychotherapy. Acad Psychiatry 2003; 27: 136–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Giordano FL, Briones DF: Assessing residents’ competence in psychotherapy. Acad Psychiatry 2003; 27: 145–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Morgan PJ, Cleave-Hogg D: A Canadian simulation experience: faculty and student opinions of a performance evaluation study. Br J Anaesthesia 2000; 85: 779–781

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Day SC, Grosso LJ, Norcini JJ Jr, et al: Residents’ perception of evaluation procedures used by their training program. J Gen Intern Med 1990; 5: 421–426

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cogill KK, O’Sullivan PS, Clardy J: Residents’ perception of effectiveness of twelve evaluation methods for measuring competency. Acad Psychiatry 2005; 29: 76–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yager J, Bienenfeld D: How competent are we to assess psychotherapeutic competence of psychiatric residents? Acad Psychiatry 2003; 27: 174–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Falender CA, Cornish JA, Goodyear R, et al: Defining competencies in psychology supervision: a consensus statement. J Clin Psychol 2004; 60: 771–785

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khurshid A. Khurshid M.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khurshid, K.A., Bennett, J.I., Vicari, S. et al. Residency Programs and Psychotherapy Competencies: A Survey of Chief Residents. Acad Psychiatry 29, 452–458 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.29.5.452

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.29.5.452

Keywords

Navigation