Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Using Standardized Patients for Formative Feedback in an Introduction to Psychotherapy Course

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Academic Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Standardized patients (SPs) were used in a 9-week Introduction to Psychodynamic Psychotherapy course for 11 first-year psychiatry residents. After 7 weeks of coursework, each resident conducted a simulated initial psychotherapy session. The SPs used were experienced in simulating psychiatric disorders and were free to use as much or as little personal history as they wished. Session ratings by the SPs afforded written feedback to the residents. The sessions were videotaped and selected segments viewed and discussed by the class. Residents kept their tapes and were encouraged to review them on their own and with their supervisors. Residents, SPs, and class instructor all rated the experience very positively. Standardized patients may be a useful adjunct to psychotherapy education. They can provide valuable learning opportunities without giving rise to concerns that complicate the videotaping of actual patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Norman GR, Barrows HS, Gliva G, et al: Simulated Patients in Assessing Clinical Competence. Edited by Neufeld VR, Norman GR. New York, Springer, 1985

  2. Vu NV, Barrows HS: Use of standardized patients in clinical assessments: recent developments and measurement findings. Educational Researcher 1994; 23(3): 23–30

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hodges B, Turnbull J, Cohen R, et al: Evaluating communication skills in the objective structured clinical examination format: reliability and generalizability. Med Educ 1996; 30: 38–43

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sanson-Fisher RW, Poole AD: Simulated patients and the assessment of medical students’ interpersonal skills. Med Educ 1980; 14: 249–253

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Edinger W, Robertson J, Skeel J, et al: Using standardized patients to teach clinical ethics. Medical Education Online 2001. www.med-ed-online.org

  6. Norman GR, Tugwell P: A comparison of resident performance on real and simulated patients. Journal of Medical Education 1982; 57: 708–715

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. ACGME competencies: suggested best methods for evaluation. ACGME/ABMS Joint Initiative: Toolbox of Assessment Methods, Version 1.1, September 2000. Available at www.acgme.org/Outcome/ToolTable.pdf (accessed 7/20/01)

  8. Norton J: The use of patient-actors on the oral psychiatric examination and in the residency training process. Academic Psychiatry 2000; 24: 176–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Coyle B, Miller M, McGowen KR: Using standardized patients to teach and learn psychotherapy. Acad Med 1998; 73: 591–592

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Carney PA, Dietrich AJ, Eliassen MS, et al: Recognizing and managing depression in primary care: a standardized patient study. J Fam Pract 1999; 48: 965–972

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hodges B, Regehr G, Hanson M, et al: An Objective structured clinical examination for evaluating psychiatric clinical clerks. Acad Med 1997; 72: 715–721

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hodges B, Regehr G, Hanson M, et al: Validation of an objective structured clinical examination in psychiatry. Acad Med 1998; 73: 910–912

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Klamen D: The use of standardized patients in the evaluation of psychiatry clinical clerks (abstract). Association of Academic Psychiatry Annual Meeting, 1998

  14. Hodges B, Hanson M, McNaughton N, et al: What do psychiatry residents think of an objective structured clinical examination? Academic Psychiatry 1999; 23: 198–204

    Google Scholar 

  15. Krahn LE, Sutor B, Bostwick JM: Conveying emotional realism: a challenge to using standardized patients. Acad Med 2001; 76: 216–217

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Beitman B, Yue D: A new psychotherapy training program. Academic Psychiatry 1999; 23: 95–102

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stiles WB, Snow JS: Counseling session impact as viewed by novice counselors and their clients. J Couns Psychol 1984; 31: 3–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Woodward CA, Gliva-McConvey G: The effect of simulating on standardized patients. Acad Med 1995; 70: 418–420

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vu NV, Barrows HS, Marcy M, et al: Six years of comprehensive, clinical performance-based assessment using standardized patients at the Southern Illinois University School of Medicine. Acad Med 1992; 67: 42–50

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Clinical Peformance Center, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA

    Debra L. Klamen M.D., MHPE (Associate Dean for Undergraduate Curriculum) &  Rachel Yudkowsky M.D., MHPE (Associate Director of Faculty Development and Director)

Authors
  1. Debra L. Klamen M.D., MHPE
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rachel Yudkowsky M.D., MHPE
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klamen, D.L., Yudkowsky, R. Using Standardized Patients for Formative Feedback in an Introduction to Psychotherapy Course. Acad Psychiatry 26, 168–172 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.26.3.168

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.26.3.168

Keywords

Search

Navigation