Skip to main content
Log in

Subspecialty Exposure in a Psychiatry Clerkship Does Not Improve Student Performance in the Subject Examination

  • Published:
Academic Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The authors compared the NBME subject examination scores and subspecialty profiles of 3rd-year medical students who were assigned to psychiatry subspecialties during their clerkship with those who were not.

Methods

The authors collated and analyzed the shelf examination scores, the clinical grades, and the child psychiatry and emergency psychiatry shelf profiles of 361 junior medical students in two medical schools during their psychiatry clerkship.

Results

There were no significant differences on these parameters between the students assigned to subspecialty sites and those who were not.

Conclusions

This study, like some similar previous studies in other clerkships, calls attention to the lack of measurable academic benefit of fragmenting and compartmentalizing the psychiatry clerkship experience for 3rd-year medical students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME): LCME Accreditation Standards; available at http://www.lcme.org/standard.htm; accessed March 2012

  2. Bostwick JM, Alexander C: Shorter psychiatry clerkship length is associated with lower NBME psychiatry shelf exam performance. Acad Psychiatry 2012; 36:174–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gunderson CH, Dougherty DS, Ford GC, et al: Different formats for a neurology clerkship do not influence written examination scores. Mil Med 2003; 168:872–875

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Poisson SN, Gelb DJ, Oh MFS, et al: Experience may not be the best teacher: patient logs do not correlate with clerkship performance. Neurology 2009; 72:699–704

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Greenberg LW, Getson PR: Assessing student performance on a pediatric clerkship. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1996; 150:1209–1212

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Greenberg LW, Getson P: Clinical experiences of medical students in a pediatric clerkship and performance on the NBME subject test: are they related? Med Teach 1999; 21:420–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Beck GL, Matache MT, Riha C, et al: Clinical experience and examination performance: is there a correlation? Med Educ 2007; 41:550–555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Martin IG, Stark P, Jolly B: Benefiting from clinical experience: the influence of learning style and clinical experience on performance in an undergraduate objective structured clinical examination. Med Educ 2000; 34:530–534

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. McManus IC, Richards P, Winder BC, et al: Clinical experience, performance in final examinations, and learning style in medical students: prospective study. BMJ 1998; 316:345–350

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sidhu SS, Chandra RM, Wang L, et al: The effect of an end-of-clerkship review session on NBME psychiatry subject exam scores. Acad Psychiatry 2012; 36:226–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolina Retamero M.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Retamero, C., Ramchandani, D. Subspecialty Exposure in a Psychiatry Clerkship Does Not Improve Student Performance in the Subject Examination. Acad Psychiatry 37, 179–181 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.12040074

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.12040074

Keywords

Navigation