Skip to main content
Log in

A Method for Evaluating Competency in Assessment and Management of Suicide Risk

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Academic Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 July 2012

This article has been updated

Abstract

Objective

Although health professionals increasingly are expected to be able to assess and manage patients’ risk for suicide, few methods are available to evaluate this competency. This report describes development of a competency-assessment instrument for suicide risk-assessment (CAI—S), and evaluates its use in an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE).

Methods

The authors developed the CAI—S on the basis of the literature on suicide risk-assessment and management, and consultation with faculty focus groups from three sites in a large academic psychiatry department. The CAI—S structures faculty ratings regarding interviewing and data collection, case formulation and presentation, treatment-planning, and documentation. To evaluate the CAI—S, 31 faculty members used it to rate the performance of 31 learners (26 psychiatric residents and 5 clinical psychology interns) who participated in an OSCE. After interviewing a standardized patient, learners presented their risk-assessment findings and treatment plans. Faculty used the CAI—S to structure feedback to the learners. In a subsidiary study of interrater reliability, six faculty members rated video-recorded suicide risk-assessments.

Results

The CAI—S showed good internal consistency, reliability, and interrater reliability. Concurrent validity was supported by the finding that CAI—S ratings were higher for senior learners than junior learners, and were higher for learners with more clinical experience with suicidal patients than learners with less clinical experience. Faculty and learners rated the method as helpful for structuring feedback and supervision.

Conclusion

The findings support the usefulness of the CAI—S for evaluating competency in suicide risk-assessment and management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Lurie SJ, Mooney CJ, Lyness JM: Measurement of the general competencies of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education: a systematic review. Acad Med 2009; 84:301–309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kaslow N: Competencies in professional psychology. Am Psychologist 2004; 59:774–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rudd MD, Cukrowicz, Bryan CJ: Core competencies in suicide risk assessment and management: implications for supervision. Training Educ Profess Psychol 2008; 2:219–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Scheiber SC, Kramer TA, Adamowski SE: Core Competencies for Psychiatric Practice: What Clinicians Need to Know: A Report of the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology, Inc., Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Press, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  5. ACGME Psychiatry Residency Requirements; available at www.acgme.org/acWebsite/downloads/RRC_progReq/400pr1104.pdf; accessed Feb 6, 2009

  6. Andrews LB, Burruss JW: Core Competencies for Psychiatric Education: Defining, Teaching, and Assessing Resident Competence, 3rd Edition. Arlington, VA, American Psychiatric Publishing, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mann JJ, Apter A, Bertolote J, et al: Suicide prevention strategies: a systematic review. JAMA 2005; 292:2064–2074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Melton BB, Coverdale JH: What do we teach psychiatric residents about suicide? a national survey of chief residents. Acad Psychiatry 2009; 33:47–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pisanti AR, Cross WF, Gould M: The assessment and management of suicide risk: state of workshop education. Suicide Life Threat Behav 2011; 4:255–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shea SC, Barney C: Macro-training: a “how-to” primer for using serial role-playing to train complex clinical interviewing tasks such as suicide assessment. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2007; 30:e1–e29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McNiel DE, Fordwood SR, Weaver CM, et al: Effects of training on suicide risk assessment. Psychiatr Serv 2008; 59:1462–1465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Newble D: Techniques for measuring clinical competence: objective structured clinical examinations. Med Educ 2004; 38:199–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Goisman RM, Levin RM, Krupat E, et al: Psychiatric OSCE performance of students with and without a previous core psychiatry clerkship. Acad Psychiatry 2010; 34:141–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. American Psychiatric Association: Practice Guidelines for the Assessment and Treatment of Patients With Suicidal Behavior. Arlington, VA, American Psychiatric Association, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bongar B, Berman AL, Maris RW, et al. (eds): Risk Management With Suicidal Patients. New York, Guilford, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  16. Simon RI, Hales RE (eds): Textbook of Suicide Assessment and Management. Arlington, VA, American Psychiatric Publishing, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  17. Appelbaum PD, Gutheil TG: Clinical Handbook of Psychiatry and the Law, 3rd Edition. Philadelphia, PA, Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  18. Simpson S, Stacy M: Avoiding the malpractice snare: documenting suicide risk assessment. J Psychiatr Pract 2004; 10:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Swick S: Assessing the ACGME competencies in psychiatry training programs. Acad Psychiatry 2006; 30:330–351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Schuwirth LT, Van der Vleuten CM: Changing education, changing assessment, changing research? Med Educ 2004; 38:805–812

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hays RB, Davies HA, Beard JD: Selecting performance assessment methods for experienced physicians. Med Educ 2002; 36:910–917

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Epstein RM, Hundert EM: Defining and assessing professional competence. JAMA 2002; 287:226–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bienenfeld D, Klykylo W, Lehrer D: Closing the loop: assessing the effectiveness of psychiatric competency measures. Acad Psychiatry 2003; 27:131–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bhugra D, Malik A: Workplace-Based Assessments in Psychiatric Training. Boston, MA, Cambridge University Press, 2011

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erick K. Hung M.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hung, E.K., Binder, R.e.L., Fordwood, S.R. et al. A Method for Evaluating Competency in Assessment and Management of Suicide Risk. Acad Psychiatry 36, 23–28 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.10110160

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.10110160

Keywords

Navigation