Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of Professional Role Competency During Psychiatry Residency

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Academic Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The authors sought to determine psychiatry residents’ perceptions on the current method of evaluating professional role competency and the use of multi-source feedback (MSF) as an assessment tool.

Method

Authors disseminated a structured, anonymous survey to 128 University of Toronto psychiatry residents, evaluating the current mode of assessment of the professional role and the use of MSF.

Results

The overall response rate was 86%. Fewer than half (44%) of residents felt that their professional role is adequately evaluated, and 84% were in favor of incorporating MSF for the evaluation of this competency. Respondents believed their primary supervisor should have the largest proportional impact on the evaluation (50%), followed by allied heath staff (19%), patients (16%), co-residents (12%), self(11%), and administrative staff(9%).

Conclusion

On the basis of this needs assessment and the Royal College recommendations, MSF may be considered a potential assessment tool for evaluating psychiatry residents in their professional role.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Papadakis MA, Teherani A, Banach MA, et al: Disciplinary action by medical boards and prior behavior in medical school. New Engl J Med 2005; 353:25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Frank JR, Jabbour M: Report of the CanMEDs Phase IV Working Groups. Ottawa,Canada: The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. March, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stern DT, Frohna AZ, Gruppen LD: The prediction of professional behavior. Med Educ 2005; 39:75–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Epstein RM, Hundert EM: Defining and assessing professional competence. JAMA 2002; 287:226–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bandiera G, Sherbino J, Frank J: The CanMEDS Assessment Tools Handbook. Ottawa, Canada, The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jamtvedt G, Young JM, Kristoffersen DT, et al: Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006, CD000259

  7. Violato C, Lockyer JM, Fidler H: Assessment of psychiatrists in practice through multisource feedback. Can J Psychiatry 2008; 53:525–533

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Davis JD: Comparison of faculty, peer, self-, and nurse assessment of obstetrics and gynecology residents, Obstet Gyn 2002; 99:647–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wood J, Collins J, Burnside E, et al: Patient, faculty, and self-assessment of radiology resident performance: a 360-degree method of measuring professionalism and interpersonal/communication skills. Acad Radiol 2004; 11:931–939

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wood L, Hassel A, Whitehouse A, et al: A literature review of multi-source feedback systems within and without health services leading to 10 tips for their successful design. Med Teacher 2006; 28:185–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nikola N. Grujich M.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grujich, N.N., Razmy, A., Zaretsky, A. et al. Evaluation of Professional Role Competency During Psychiatry Residency. Acad Psychiatry 36, 126–128 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.10060085

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.10060085

Keywords

Navigation