Academic Psychiatry

, Volume 35, Issue 5, pp 335–339

Using Multimodal and Multimedia Tools in the Psychiatric Education of Diverse Learners: Examples From the Mental Status Exam

Media Column


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    DeBello TC: Comparison of eleven major learning style models: variables, appropriate populations, validity of instrumentation, and the research behind them. Reading, Writing Learning Disabil 1990; 6:203–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hawk TF: Using learning style instruments to enhance student learning. Decision Sci J Innovative Educ 2007; Vol. 5Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Curry L: Integrating concepts of cognitive or learning style: a review with attention to psychometric standards. Ottawa, ON, Canadian College of Health Service Executives, 1987Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Simms RR, Simms SJ: The importance of learning styles: understanding the implications for learning, course design, and education. Westport, CT, Greenwood Press, 1995Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    MacKeracher D: Making sense of adult learning, 2nd Edition. Toronto, Ont., Canada, University of Toronto Press, 2004Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fleming N, Mills C: Not another inventory, rather a catalyst for reflection. To Improve the Acad 1992; 11:137Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fleming, ND, et al: Retrieved on Dec 30, 2009
  8. 8.
    Fleming ND, et al: Retrieved on Dec 19, 2009
  9. 9.
    Lujan HL, DiCarlo SE: First-year medical students prefer multiple learning styles. Adv Physiol Educ 2006; 30:13–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baykan Z, Nacar M: Learning styles of first-year medical students attending Erciyes University in Kayseri, Turkey. Adv Physiol Educ 2007; 31:158–160PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Murphy RJ, Gray SA, Straja SR, et al: Student learning preferences and teaching implications. Dent Educ 2004; 68: 859–866Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fadel C, Lemke C: Multimodal learning through media: what the research says, in Metiri Group, A Cisco White Paper, 2008Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ittia L, Baldi P: Bayesian surprise attracts human attention. Vision Research 2009; 49(10):1295–1306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chandler P, Sweller J: Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cogn Instruct 1991; 8:293–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sweller J, Chandler P, Tienery P, et al: Cognitive load as a factor in the structuring of technical material. J Gen Exp Psychol 1990; 119:176–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Luck SJ, Vogel EK: The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature 1997; 390:279–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Miller GC: The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev 1956; 63:81–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Marois R, Ivanoff J: Capacity limits of information-processing in the brain. Trends Cogn Sci 2005; 9:296–305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cowan N: The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behav Brain Sci 2001; 24:87–185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mayer RE, Moreno R: A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. J Educ Psychol 1998; 90:312–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Phelps EA, LeDoux JE: Contributions of the amygdala to emotion processing: from animal models to human behavior. Neuron 2005; 48:175–187PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Craik FIM, Lockhart RS: Levels of processing: a framework for memory research. J Verbal Learn Verbal Behav 1972; 11:671–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dunn R, Beaudry JS, Klavas A: Survey of research on learning styles. Educ Leadership 1989; 46:50–58Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dunn R: Commentary: teaching students through their perceptual strengths or preferences. J Reading 1988; 31:304–309Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Felder RM, Henriques ER: Learning and teaching styles in foreign and second language education. Foreign Lang Ann 1995; 28:21–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stahl SA: Different strokes for different folks? in Taking Sides: Clashing on Controversial Issues in Educational Psychology. Edited by Abbeduto L. Guilford, CT, McGraw-Hill, 2002Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Moreno R, Mayer RE: Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: the role of modality and contiguity. J Educ Psychol 1999; 91:358–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dubois M, Vial I: Multimedia design: the effects of relating multimodal information. J Computer-Assisted Learn 2000; 16:157–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mayer RE, Heiser J, Lonn S: Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: when presenting more material results in less understanding. J Educ Psychol 2001; 93:187–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mankey VL, Kim CK: A multimodal and multimedia presentation of the mental status exam: using technology to breakdown learning barriers. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of ADMSEP, Portsmouth, NH, 2009Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Averbuch RN, Garvan C: It works! teaching psychiatry with videos enhances long-term retention, in Plenary: Research in Medical Education. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of ADMSEP, Portsmouth, NH, 2009Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Academic Psychiatry 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept. of PsychiatryMassachusetts General HospitalBoston

Personalised recommendations