Advertisement

Academic Psychiatry

, Volume 35, Issue 3, pp 168–174 | Cite as

Professional Boundaries in the Era of the Internet

  • Glen O. GabbardEmail author
  • Kristin A. Kassaw
  • Gonzalo Perez-Garcia
Original Article

Abstract

Objective

The era of the Internet presents new dilemmas in educating psychiatrists about professional boundaries. The objective of this overview is to clarify those dilemmas and offer recommendations for dealing with them.

Methods

The characteristics of social networking sites, blogs, and search engines are reviewed with a specific focus on their potential to present problems of professional boundaries for psychiatrists.

Results

The professional boundary questions that have arisen in the expanded world of online communication can be subdivided into three areas: ethical concerns, professionalism issues, and clinical dilemmas. Only the first category involves true boundary problems as normally defined.

Conclusion

The expansion of the Internet has redefined traditional areas of privacy and anonymity in the clinical setting. Guidelines are proposed to manage the alteration of professional boundaries, as well as issues of professionalism and clinical work, that have arisen from the complexities of cyberspace. The author discusses implications for residency training.

Keywords

Search Engine Social Networking Site Academic Psychiatry Privacy Setting Psychiatric Resident 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kassaw K, Gabbard GO: The ethics of e-mail communication in psychiatry. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2002; 25:665–674PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Facebook: Facebook Factsheet. Available at http://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?factsheet
  3. 3.
    Ybarra ML, Mitchell KJ: How risky are social networking sites? A comparison of places online where youth solicitation and harassment occurs. Pediatrics 2008; 121(2):e350–e357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thompson LA, Dawson K, Ferdig R, et al: The intersection of online social networking with medical professionalism. J Gen Intern Med 2008; 23:954–957PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chretien KC, Greysen SR, Chretien JP, et al: Online posting of unprofessional content by medical students. JAMA 2009; 302:1309–1315PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jain SH: Practicing medicine in the age of facebook. N Engl J Med 2009; 361:649–651PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lagu T, Kaufman EJ, Asch DA, et al: Content of weblogs written by health professionals. J Gen Intern Med 2008; 23:1642–1646PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kovic I, Lulic I, Brumini G: Examining the medical blogosphere: an online survey of medical bloggers. J Med Internet Res 2008; 10(3):e28PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grossman L: Why facebook is for old fogies. Time Magazine 2009; 173:94Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stone B: Is Facebook growing up too fast? New York Times, March 29, 2009, Sunday Business, p. 1Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    McCullagh D, Broache A: Blogs turn 10—who’s the father? CNET News March 20, 2007. Available at http://news.cnet.com/2100-1025_3-6168681.html
  12. 12.
    Beauchamp TL: The philosophical basis of psychiatric ethics. In: Bloch S, Green SA, Eds. Psychiatric Ethics. New York, N.Y. Oxford University Press, 2009, pp 25–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gabbard GO: Disguise or consent. Problems and recommendations concerning the publication and presentation of clinical material. Int J Psychoanal 2000; 81. Pt 6:1071–1086PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gutheil TG, Gabbard GO: The concept of boundaries in clinical practice: theoretical and risk-management dimensions. Am J Psychiatry 1993; 150:188–196PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gabbard GO: Professionalism in Psychiatry. Arlington, Va, American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc, in pressGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM, Founda-American Board of Internal Medicine ACP-ASIM, Foundation American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine, European Federation of Internal Medicine: Medical Professionalism in the New Millennium: the Physician Charter. Annals of Internal Medicine 2002; 136: 243–246Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gutheil TG, Gabbard GO: Misuses and misunderstandings of boundary theory in clinical and regulatory settings. Am J Psychiatry 1998; 155:409–414PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Huremovic D, Rao N: Beyond doctor-patient relationship in cyberspace: pitfalls, transgressions and guidelines (when therapists and patients Google each other). Presented at 2009. APA Annual Meeting, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Guseh JS 2nd, Brendel RW, Brendel DH: Medical professionalism in the age of online social networking. J Med Ethics 2009; 35:584–586PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gorrindo T, Groves JE: Web searching for information about physicians. JAMA 2008; 300:213–215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Healthcare Blogger Code of Ethics: The Code. Available at http://medbloggercode.com/the-code/
  22. 22.
    PRMS: Risk management tips for physician bloggers. Psychiatric News 2009; 44(18):31Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    White H: Locating clinical boundaries in the world wide Web. Am J Psychiatry 2009; 166:620–621PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academic Psychiatry 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Glen O. Gabbard
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kristin A. Kassaw
    • 1
  • Gonzalo Perez-Garcia
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryBaylor College of MedicineHouston, Bellaire
  2. 2.University of Texas Southwestern Medical SchoolDallas

Personalised recommendations