Academic Psychiatry

, Volume 34, Issue 2, pp 128–131 | Cite as

Selection Factors Among International Medical Graduates and Psychiatric Residency Performance

Brief Report

Abstract

Objective

The authors examine the association between the selection factors used in a psychiatric residency program and subsequent clinical and academic performance among international medical graduate (IMG) candidates.

Methods

The authors completed a retrospective review of application files and residency evaluations of 50 IMG residents who completed the 4- year psychiatry training in a university- affiliated program from July 1994 through June 2004.

Results

United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 and personal interview appear associated with residents’ performance determined by the program director’s ranking. Standardized examinations before (USMLE Step 1 and 2) and during the residency (PRITE) were significantly correlated (USMLE 1, r = 0.37; USMLE 2, r=0.40, p<0.003). Personal interview scores and psychotherapy treatment session evaluations were also significantly associated (r=0.38, p<0.003).

Conclusion

Further research is necessary to determine predictive factors related to psychiatric residents’ performance, especially among IMGs. Adjusting current selection criteria may result in better outcomes for training programs and future psychiatrists.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    National Residency Matching Program 2007. Match Data. Available at www.nrmp.org/data/historicalreports.html#programresults
  2. 2.
    Marshall JR, Crowder M, Rice DG: Selection of psychiatry residents: an overview. J Nerv Ment Dis 1972; 155: 436–442CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rao NR: Recent trends in psychiatry residency workforce with special reference to international medical graduates. Acad Psychiatry 2003; 27: 269–276CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rao NR, Meinzer AE, Primavera LH, et al: Psychiatry residency selection criteria for American and foreign medical graduates. Acad Psychiatry 1991; 15: 69–79CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gayed NM: Residency directors’ assessments of which selection criteria best predict the performances of foreign-born foreign medical graduates during internal medicine residencies. Acad Med 1991; 66: 699–701CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Smilen SW, Funai EF, Bianco AT: Residency selection: should interviewers be given applicants’ board scores? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 184: 508–513CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Part HM, Markert RJ: Predicting the first-year performances of international medical graduates in an internal medicine residency. Acad Med 1993; 68: 856–858CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kuncel NR, Hezlett SA: Assessment: standardized tests predict graduate students’ success. Science 2007; 315: 1080–1081CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sheehan TJ, Husted S, Candee D, et al: Moral judgment as a predictor of clinical performance. Eval Health Profession 1980; 3: 393–404Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Self DJ, Baldwin DC Jr: Should moral reasoning serve as a criterion for student and resident selection? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000; 378: 115–123CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academic Psychiatry 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Geriatric Psychiatry Clinic, Mental Health Service Line, Minneapolis VA Medical CenterUniversity of Minnesota Medical SchoolMinneapolisUSA
  2. 2.Department of Psychiatry and PsychologyMayo ClinicRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations