Advertisement

Academic Psychiatry

, Volume 33, Issue 6, pp 484–491 | Cite as

Students’ Views on Factors Affecting Empathy in Medical Education

  • Jeffrey Winseman
  • Abid Malik
  • Julie Morison
  • Victoria Balkoski
Original Article

Abstract

Objective

Empathy is a prominent goal of medical education that is too often underachieved. Using concept mapping, the authors constructed a student-generated conceptual model of factors viewed as affecting empathy during medical education.

Methods

During the 2005–2006 academic year, 293 medical students and interns answered a brainstorming survey asking respondents to list factors affecting empathy, and 34 participants then sorted the factors into categories and rated each factor’s relative importance. Factors and ratings were examined using multidimensional scaling and cluster analyses, Pearson’s r, and Student’s t test. This process, known as “concept mapping,” was conducted using Concept Systems.

Results

One hundred sixty perceived empathy factors were identified and sorted into four clusters: personal experiences, connections and beliefs; negative feelings and attitudes toward patients; mentoring and clinical experiences that promote professional growth (rated most important); and school and work experiences that undermine development of empathy (rated least important). All students rated factors in a similar hierarchical fashion across all four clusters with no differences among groups. Listening was the most highly rated factor.

Conclusion

Students consider experiences that promote personal and professional growth to be the most important factors affecting empathy in medical education. Though less important to students, negative feelings and attitudes toward patients, as well as negative school and work experiences, affect empathy at all stages of education.

Keywords

Medical Student Medical Education Academic Psychiatry Negative Feeling Concept System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    American Board of Internal Medicine: Professionalism in medicine: issues and opportunities in the educational environment, in American Board of Internal Medicine: Project Professionalism, 2001. pp 5–10. Available at www.abim.org/pdf/publications/professionalism.pdf
  2. 2.
    Di Blasi Z, Harkness E, Ernst E, et al: Influence of context effects on health outcomes: a systematic review. Lancet 2001; 357: 757–762PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hojat M, Mangione S, Nasca TJ, et al: An empirical study of decline in empathy in medical school. Med Educ 2004; 38: 934–941PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hojat M, Mangione S, Nasca TJ, et al: Empathy scores in medical school and ratings of empathic behavior in residency training 3 years later. J Soc Psychol 2005; 145: 663–672PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bellini LM, Shea JA: Mood change and empathy decline persist during three years of internal medicine training. Acad Med 2005; 80: 164–167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rosen IM, Gimotty PA, Shea JA, et al: Evolution of sleep quantity, sleep deprivation, mood disturbance, empathy and burnout among interns. Acad Med 2006; 81: 82–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen D, Lew R, Hershman W, et al: A cross-sectional measurement of medical student empathy. J Gen Intern Med 2007; 22: 1434–1438PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Newton BW, Barber L, Clardy J, et al: Is there hardening of the heart during medical school? Acad Med 2008; 83: 244–249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Feighny KM, Arnold L, Monaco M, et al: In pursuit of empathy and its relation to physician communication skills: multidimensional empathy training for medical students. Ann Behav Sci Med Educ 1998; 5: 13–21Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Woloschuk W, Harasym PH, Temple W: Attitude change during medical school: a cohort study. Med Educ 2004; 38: 522–534PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Griffith CH, Wilson JF: The loss of student idealism in the 3rd-year clinical clerkships. Eval Health Prof 2001; 24: 61–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shanafelt TD, West C, Zhao X, et al: Relationship between increased personal well-being and enhanced empathy among internal medicine residents. J Gen Inern Med 2005; 20: 559–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thomas MR, Dyrbe LN, Huntington JL, et al: How do distress and well-being relate to medical student empathy? A multicenter study. J Gen Intern Med 2007; 22: 177–183PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    West CP, Huschka MM, Novotny PJ, et al: Association of perceived medical errors with resident distress and empathy. JAMA 2006; 296: 1071–1078PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jackson K, Trochim WK: Concept mapping as an alternative approach for the analysis of open-ended survey responses. Organizational Research Methods 2002; 5: 307–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kane M, Trochim WK: Concept Mapping for Planning and Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, Calif, Sage Publications, 2007Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Donnelly JP, Donnelly K, Grohman KK: A multi-perspective concept mapping study of problems associated with traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 2005; 19: 1077–1085PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sutherland S, Katz S: Concept mapping methodology: a catalyst for organizational learning. Eval Program Planning 2005; 28: 257–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Trochim WK: The Concept System. Ithaca, NY, Concept Systems, 2005Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Krippendorf K: Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Newbury Park, Calif, Sage Publications, 1980Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dunn W: Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall, 1981Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Keith D: Refining concept maps: methodical issues and an example. Eval Program Plann 1989; 12: 75–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Davison M: Multidimensional Scaling. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1983Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ward JH: Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J Am Statistical Assoc 1963; 58: 236–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Everitt B: Cluster Analysis. New York, Halstead Press-John Wiley & Sons, 1980Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Anderberg M: Cluster Analysis for Applications. New York, Academic Press, 1973Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Carley K: Coding choices for textual analysis: a comparison of content analysis and map analysis, in Sociological Methodology. Edited by Marsden P. Washington, DC, Blackwell Scientific-American Sociological Association, 1993, 23: 75–126Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Trochim WK: Pattern matching, validity, and conceptualization in program evaluation. Evaluation Rev 1985; 9: 575–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dyrbye LN, Thomas MR, Huntington JL, et al: Personal life events and medical student burnout: a multicenter study. Acad Med 2006; 81: 374–384PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Aagaard EM, Hauer KE: A cross-sectional descriptive study of mentoring relationships formed by medical students. J Gen Intern Med 2003; 18: 298–302PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hauer KE, Teherani A, Dechet A, et al: Medical students’ perceptions of mentoring: a focus-group analysis. Med Teach 2005; 27: 732–734PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kenney NP, Mann KV, MacLeod H: Role modeling in physicians’ professional formation: reconsidering an essential but untapped educational strategy. Acad Med 2003; 78: 1203–1210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Broquet KE, Rocky PH: Teaching residents and program directors about physician impairment. Acad Psychiatry 2004; 28: 221–225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dunn L, Iglewicz A, Moutier C: A conceptual model of medical student well-being: promoting resilience and preventing burnout. Acad Psychiatry 2008; 32: 44–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academic Psychiatry 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey Winseman
    • 1
  • Abid Malik
    • 1
  • Julie Morison
    • 1
  • Victoria Balkoski
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryAlbany Medical CollegeAlbanyUSA

Personalised recommendations