Psychiatry Residency Training Around the World
- 121 Downloads
The authors compare and contrast psychiatry residency training in the United States to that in Canada and selected countries in South America, Europe, and Asia.
Nine individuals who are intimately familiar with psychiatry residency training in the United States (primarily chairs, training directors associate training directors or residents) and who trained in other countries describe their past training programs in terms of clinical experiences, didactic structure, supervision, evaluation, and major differences from U.S. training.
Medical education and psychiatry training vary considerably in different regions in terms of the duration of training, structure of clinical experiences level of responsibility and autonomy of trainee, amount of classroom teaching, national examinations and credentialing. Some are much less structured than training in the United States (e.g., Sweden) while others are somewhat more structured (e.g., Korea), but differences appear to be lessening.
Although similarities outweigh differences between programs in various continents and countries, training programs around the globe have much to learn from each other.
KeywordsAcademic Psychiatry Adolescent Psychiatry Residency Training Geriatric Psychiatry Journal Club
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Zisook S, Bjorksten KS, Yoo T, et al: Psychiatry Residency Training Around the World. Presented at the AADPRT Annual Meeting. San Diego, Calif. March 9–12, 2006Google Scholar
- 2.American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology: Core Competencies for Psychiatric Practice: What Clinicians Need to Know. Edited by Scheiber SC, Kramer TM, Adamowski SE. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Publishing, 2003Google Scholar
- 4.Societal Needs Working Group CanMeds 2000. Project: Skills for the new millenium. Annals of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada 1996, 29: 206–216Google Scholar
- 5.Coelho BM, Zanetti MV, Lotufo Neto F: Brazilian psychiatry medical residency programs: critical analysis. Rev. psiquiatr. Rio Gd. 2005; Sul 27: 13–22Google Scholar