Advertisement

Academic Psychiatry

, Volume 29, Issue 5, pp 452–458 | Cite as

Residency Programs and Psychotherapy Competencies: A Survey of Chief Residents

  • Khurshid A. Khurshid
  • Jeffrey I. Bennett
  • Sandy Vicari
  • Karen L. Lee
  • Karen E. Broquet
Original Article

Abstract

Objective

To survey chief residents’ opinion about various aspects of psychotherapy competency determination.

Methods

Chief residents of various psychiatry residency programs were surveyed.

Results

One hundred two chief residents were surveyed. Seventy two (70.58%) completed the survey. Eighty four percent of the respondents reported that they were aware of the competencies. The number of patients required for competency determination in five areas of psychotherapy varied widely among the programs. Global assessment by psychotherapy supervisors was the most commonly used method of competency determination (61%). Nineteen (26%) chief residents opined that not all the faculty members involved in teaching and assessing competencies are qualified to do so. Only 23 (31%) of respondents reported that competency criteria were well integrated into the residency curriculum.

Conclusion

The little consistency in psychotherapy competency determination across various programs, the differential preparedness of programs for competencies and the lack of consistent integration of competencies into residency curricula call for development and implementation of more uniform assessment methods. This variability also calls into question the decision to establish a standard in five areas of psychotherapy competency.

Keywords

Residency Program Academic Psychiatry Psychiatry Residency Chief Resident Acad Psychiatry 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Yager J, Kay J, Mellman L: Assessing psychotherapy competence: A beginning. Acad Psychiatry 2003; 27: 125–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mellman LA, Beresin E: Psychotherapy competencies: development and implementation. Acad Psychiatry 2003; 27: 149–153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Manring J, Beitman BD, Dewan MJ: Evaluating competence in psychotherapy. Acad Psychiatry 2003; 27: 136–144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Giordano FL, Briones DF: Assessing residents’ competence in psychotherapy. Acad Psychiatry 2003; 27: 145–147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Morgan PJ, Cleave-Hogg D: A Canadian simulation experience: faculty and student opinions of a performance evaluation study. Br J Anaesthesia 2000; 85: 779–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Day SC, Grosso LJ, Norcini JJ Jr, et al: Residents’ perception of evaluation procedures used by their training program. J Gen Intern Med 1990; 5: 421–426PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cogill KK, O’Sullivan PS, Clardy J: Residents’ perception of effectiveness of twelve evaluation methods for measuring competency. Acad Psychiatry 2005; 29: 76–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yager J, Bienenfeld D: How competent are we to assess psychotherapeutic competence of psychiatric residents? Acad Psychiatry 2003; 27: 174–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Falender CA, Cornish JA, Goodyear R, et al: Defining competencies in psychology supervision: a consensus statement. J Clin Psychol 2004; 60: 771–785PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academic Psychiatry 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Khurshid A. Khurshid
    • 1
  • Jeffrey I. Bennett
    • 2
  • Sandy Vicari
    • 2
  • Karen L. Lee
    • 2
  • Karen E. Broquet
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of NeurologyUniversity of ChicagoChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychiatrySouthern Illinois University School of MedicineCarbondaleUSA
  3. 3.Department of Internal Medicine-PsychiatrySouthern Illinois University School of MedicineCarbondaleUSA

Personalised recommendations