Academic Psychiatry

, Volume 29, Issue 2, pp 180–186 | Cite as

Guidelines, Algorithms, and Evidence-Based Psychopharmacology Training for Psychiatric Residents

  • David N. Osser
  • Robert D. Patterson
  • James J. Levitt
Perspective

Abstract

Objective

The authors describe a course of instruction for psychiatry residents that attempts to provide the cognitive and informational tools necessary to make scientifically grounded decision making a routine part of clinical practice.

Methods

In weekly meetings over two academic years, the course covers the psychopharmacology of various psychiatric disorders in 32 3-hour modules. The first half of each module is a case conference, and the second is a literature review of papers related to the case. The case conference focuses on the extent to which past treatment has been consistent with evidence-supported guidelines and algorithms, and the discussants make recommendations that take the relevant scientific evidence into consideration. The second half of each module focuses on two papers: 1) a published guideline, algorithm, or review article and 2) a research study.

Results

Residents absorb a comprehensive overview of recommended clinical practices and acquire skills in assessing knowledge that affects decision making. Satisfaction with the course is rated highly.

Conclusion

The course appears useful by its face validity, but research comparing the attitudes and practice outcomes of graduates of this course compared with recipients of other training methods is needed.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Guyatt GH, Haynes RB, Jaeschke RZ, et al: Users’ guides to the medical literature XXV Evidence-based medicine: principles for applying the users’ guides to patient care. J the Am Med Assoc 2000; 284: 1290–1296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Geyman JP, Deyo RA, Ramsey SD: Evidence-based clinical practice: concepts and approaches. Boston, Mass., Butterworth-Heinemann, 2000Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lenfant C: Clinical research to clinical practice — lost in translation? New England J Med 2003; 349: 868–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jencks SF, Cuerdon T, Burwen DR, et al: Quality of medical care delivered to medicare beneficiaries: a profile at state and national levels. J the Am Med Assoc 2000; 284: 1670–1676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Solberg LI: Guideline implementation: what the literature doesn’t tell us. The Joint Commission J on Quality Improvement 2000; 26: 525–537Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bero LA, Grilli R, Grimshaw JM, et al: Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implemetation of research findings. BMJ 1998; 317: 465–168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goethe JW, Schwartz HI, Szarek BL: Physician compliance with practice guidelines. Connecticut Med 1997; 61: 553–558Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cannon DS, Allen SN: A comparison of the effects of computer and manual reminders on compliance with a mental health clinical practice guideline. J the Am Med Informatics Assoc 2000; 7: 196–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shea S, DuMouchel W, Bahamonde L: A meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials to evaluate computer-based clinical reminder systems for preventive care in the ambulatory setting. J the Am Med Informatics Assoc 1996; 3: 399–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bauer MS: A review of quantitative studies of adherence to mental health clinical practice guidelines. Harvard Rev of Psychiatry 2002; 10: 138–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wazana A: Physicians and the pharmaceutical industry: is a gift ever just a gift? J the Am Med Assoc 2000; 283: 373–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goldman CR, Cutler DL: Pharmaceutical industry support of psychiatric research and education: ethical issues and remedies, in Ethics in community mental health care: commonplace concerns. Edited by Backlar P, Cutler D. New York., Kluwer Academic Press/Plenum Publishers, 2002Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dana J, Loewenstein G: A social science perspective on gifts to physicians from industry. J the Am Med Assoc 2003; 290: 252–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Relman AS: Separating continuing medical education from pharmaceutical marketing. J the Am Med Assoc 2001; 285: 2009–2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kendell R, Jablensky A: Distinguishing between the validity and utility of psychiatric diagnoses. Am J Psychiatry 2003; 160: 4–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Goldner EM, Bilsker D: Evidence-based psychiatry. Can J Psychiatry 1995; 40: 97–101PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, et al: Evidence-based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. It’s about integrating clinical expertise and the best external evidence. BMJ 1996; 312: 71–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, et al: Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. J the Am Med Assoc 1999; 282: 1458–1465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Azocar F, Cuffel BD, Goldman W, et al: Dissemination of guidelines for the treatment of major depression in a managed behavioral health care network. Psychiatr Services 2001; 52: 1014–1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stahl SM: Does evidence from clinical trials in psychopharmacology apply in clinical practice? J Clin Psychiatry 2001; 62: 6–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Leape LL: Error in medicine. J the Am Med Assoc 1994; 272: 1851–1857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Elstein AS: Cognitive processes in clinical inference and decision making, in Reasoning, inference, and judgment in clinical psychology. Edited by Turk DC, Salovey P. New York, The Free Press, 1988Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Poses RM: One size does not fit all: questions to answer before intervening to change physician behavior. Joint Commission J on Quality Improvement 1999; 25: 486–495Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Berg AO: Dimensions of evidence. J the Am Board of Family Practice 1998; 11: 216–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ferster CE, Skinner BF: Schedules of Reinforcement. New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Flexner A: Medical education in the United States and Canada: a report to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. New York, Arno Press, 1910Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bilsker D, Goldner EM: Teaching evidence-based practice in mental health. Evidence-Based Ment Health 1999; 2: 68–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Waddell C: So much research evidence, so little dissemination and uptake: mixing the useful with the pleasing. Evidence-Based Ment Health 2001; 4: 3–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Duckworth K, Hanson A: Using a clinical and evidence-based strategy to preserve access to psychiatric medications. Psychiatr Services 2002; 53: 1231–1232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Miser WF: Critical appraisal of the literature. J the Am Board of Family Practice 1999; 12: 315–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Streiner DL: Sample size and power in psychiatric research. Can J Psychiatry 1990; 35: 616–620PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hadorn DC, McCormick K, Diokno A: An annotated algorithm approach to clinical guideline development. J the Am Med Assoc 1992; 267: 3311–3314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Osser DN, Patterson RD: Algorithms for psychopharmacology, in Manual of psychiatric therapeutics, third ed. Edited by Shader RI. Boston, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2003Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Trivedi MH, Kern JK, Baker SM, et al: Computerizing medication algorithms and decision support systems for major psychiatric disorders. J Psychiatr Practice 2000; 6: 237–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Quitkin FM: Placebos, drug effects, and study design: a clinician’s guide. Am J Psychiatry 1999; 156: 829–836PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Adli M, Berghofer A, Linden M, et al: Effectiveness and feasibility of a standardized stepwise drug treatment regimen algorithm for inpatients with depressive disorders: results of a 2-year observational algorithm study. J Clin Psychiatry 2002; 63: 782–790PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Suppes T: Texas medication algorithm project, phase 3: clinical results for patients with a history of mania. J Clin Psychiatry 2003; 64: 370–382PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Epstein RM, Hundert EM: Defining and assessing professional competence. J the Am Med Assoc 2002; 287: 226–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hatala R, Guyatt G: Evaluating the teaching of evidence-based medicine. J the Am Med Assoc 2002; 288: 1110–1112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Landon BE, Normand ST, Blumenthal D, et al: Physician clinical performance assessment: prospects and barriers. J the Am Med Assoc 2003; 290: 1183–1189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Osser DN, Patterson RD, Akhter A: Impact of a psychopharmacology course that emphasizes evidence-based medicine, practice guidelines, and algorithms, poster 290 in CINP 2004 Congress, Paris,2004. Collegium Internationale Neuro-PsychopharmacologicumGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    American S of Clinical Psychopharmacology: Model Psychopharmacology Curriculum for Psychiatric Residency Programs, Training Directors, and Teachers of Psychopharmacology. New York, NY, American Society of Clinical Psychopharmacology, Inc., 1997Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Rieder RO: Book review of A Model Psychopharmacology Curriculum. Acad Psychiatry 2000;24: 2–3Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Yank G: Book review of the model psychopharmacologycurriculum. J Clin Psychiatry 2000; 61: 952–953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lomax JWI: Model curricula in psychiatric residency: evangelical failures or evocative facilitators? Acad Psychiatry 2001;25: 109–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Goldberg DA: Model curricula: the way we teach, the way we learn. Acad Psychiatry 2001;25: 98–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Glick ID, Janowsky DS, Zisook S, et al: How should we teach psychopharmacology to residents? results of the initial experiences with the ASCP model curriculum. Acad Psychiatry 2001;25: 90–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academic Psychiatry 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • David N. Osser
    • 1
  • Robert D. Patterson
    • 2
  • James J. Levitt
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryBrockton Veteran’s Administration Medical Center, Harvard Medical SchoolBrocktonUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychiatryMcLean Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBelmontUSA

Personalised recommendations