The Limited Role of Expert Guidelines in Teaching Psychopharmacology
- 27 Downloads
To consider the limited usefulness of expert guidelines for teaching psychopharmacology.
Potential problems using expert guidelines for teaching psychopharmacology are reviewed.
Expert guidelines are an important contribution to the growth of evidence-based psychiatry. As such, they may also be used to teach fundamentals of psychopharmacology. Their use as teaching materials may be limited by their reliance on Diagnostic and Statistical manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) diagnoses, especially for patients with unclear or complicated diagnosing pictures. Biases may also exist in their construction and the data from which they are derived. Other problems include overemphasis on newly released medications and the potential for teaching a “cookbook” approach to psychopharmacology treatment, limiting the development of the “art” of psychopharmacology practice.
Although expert guidelines may be a useful tool for teaching psychopharmacology, they also may limit the teaching of psychopharmacology. Comprehensive psychopharmacology training programs that use expert guidelines as teaching tools should emphasize critical reading of clinical trials literature and teaching the use of all psychotropic drugs. Training in the art of psychopharmacology including, nonpharmacological aspects of drug treatment, should also be included.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 6.Treatment of Schizophrenia. The Expert Consensu Panel for Schizophrenia. J Clin Psychiatry 1996; (Suppl 12B) 57: 3–58Google Scholar
- 7.Kahn D, Carpenter D, Docherty J, et al (eds): The Expert Consensus Guideline Series: treatment of bipolar disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 1996; (Suppl 12A) 57: 1–88Google Scholar
- 8.March JS, Frances A, Carpenter D, et al (eds): The Expert Consensus Guideline Series: treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 1997; (Suppl 4) 57:1-72Google Scholar
- 9.Alexopoulos GS, Silver JM, Kahn DA, et al (eds). The Expert Consensus Guideline Series: treatment of agitation in older persons with dementia. Postgrad Med, 1988Google Scholar
- 10.The Expert Consensus Guideline Series: Treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder. The Expert Consensus Panels for PTSD. J Clin Psychiatry 1999; (Suppl 16) 60: 3–76Google Scholar
- 12.Jobson KO, Potter WZ: International Psychopharmacology Algorithm Project Report. Psychopharm Bull 1995; 31: 457–459Google Scholar
- 15.Glenmullen J: Prozac Backlash. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000Google Scholar
- 17.Gelenberg AJ: Honoring our evidence base. Biol Ther Psychiatry 2004; 27: 25Google Scholar
- 18.Salzman C: Why don’t clinical trial results always correspond to clinical experience? Neuropsychopharm 1991; 4: 265–267Google Scholar