Academic Psychiatry

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 168–172 | Cite as

Using Standardized Patients for Formative Feedback in an Introduction to Psychotherapy Course

  • Debra L. Klamen
  • Rachel Yudkowsky
Original Article


Standardized patients (SPs) were used in a 9-week Introduction to Psychodynamic Psychotherapy course for 11 first-year psychiatry residents. After 7 weeks of coursework, each resident conducted a simulated initial psychotherapy session. The SPs used were experienced in simulating psychiatric disorders and were free to use as much or as little personal history as they wished. Session ratings by the SPs afforded written feedback to the residents. The sessions were videotaped and selected segments viewed and discussed by the class. Residents kept their tapes and were encouraged to review them on their own and with their supervisors. Residents, SPs, and class instructor all rated the experience very positively. Standardized patients may be a useful adjunct to psychotherapy education. They can provide valuable learning opportunities without giving rise to concerns that complicate the videotaping of actual patients.


Academic Psychiatry Standardize Patient Objective Structure Clinical Examination Formative Feedback Psychiatry Resident 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Norman GR, Barrows HS, Gliva G, et al: Simulated Patients in Assessing Clinical Competence. Edited by Neufeld VR, Norman GR. New York, Springer, 1985Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vu NV, Barrows HS: Use of standardized patients in clinical assessments: recent developments and measurement findings. Educational Researcher 1994; 23(3): 23–30Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hodges B, Turnbull J, Cohen R, et al: Evaluating communication skills in the objective structured clinical examination format: reliability and generalizability. Med Educ 1996; 30: 38–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sanson-Fisher RW, Poole AD: Simulated patients and the assessment of medical students’ interpersonal skills. Med Educ 1980; 14: 249–253PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Edinger W, Robertson J, Skeel J, et al: Using standardized patients to teach clinical ethics. Medical Education Online 2001.
  6. 6.
    Norman GR, Tugwell P: A comparison of resident performance on real and simulated patients. Journal of Medical Education 1982; 57: 708–715PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    ACGME competencies: suggested best methods for evaluation. ACGME/ABMS Joint Initiative: Toolbox of Assessment Methods, Version 1.1, September 2000. Available at (accessed 7/20/01)
  8. 8.
    Norton J: The use of patient-actors on the oral psychiatric examination and in the residency training process. Academic Psychiatry 2000; 24: 176–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Coyle B, Miller M, McGowen KR: Using standardized patients to teach and learn psychotherapy. Acad Med 1998; 73: 591–592PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carney PA, Dietrich AJ, Eliassen MS, et al: Recognizing and managing depression in primary care: a standardized patient study. J Fam Pract 1999; 48: 965–972PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hodges B, Regehr G, Hanson M, et al: An Objective structured clinical examination for evaluating psychiatric clinical clerks. Acad Med 1997; 72: 715–721PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hodges B, Regehr G, Hanson M, et al: Validation of an objective structured clinical examination in psychiatry. Acad Med 1998; 73: 910–912PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Klamen D: The use of standardized patients in the evaluation of psychiatry clinical clerks (abstract). Association of Academic Psychiatry Annual Meeting, 1998Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hodges B, Hanson M, McNaughton N, et al: What do psychiatry residents think of an objective structured clinical examination? Academic Psychiatry 1999; 23: 198–204Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Krahn LE, Sutor B, Bostwick JM: Conveying emotional realism: a challenge to using standardized patients. Acad Med 2001; 76: 216–217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Beitman B, Yue D: A new psychotherapy training program. Academic Psychiatry 1999; 23: 95–102Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stiles WB, Snow JS: Counseling session impact as viewed by novice counselors and their clients. J Couns Psychol 1984; 31: 3–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Woodward CA, Gliva-McConvey G: The effect of simulating on standardized patients. Acad Med 1995; 70: 418–420PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vu NV, Barrows HS, Marcy M, et al: Six years of comprehensive, clinical performance-based assessment using standardized patients at the Southern Illinois University School of Medicine. Acad Med 1992; 67: 42–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academic Psychiatry 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Debra L. Klamen
    • 1
  • Rachel Yudkowsky
    • 1
  1. 1.Clinical Peformance CenterUniversity of IllinoisChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations