Academic Psychiatry

, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp 316–322 | Cite as

Psychiatric Residents’ Attitudes Toward and Experiences With the Clinical-Skills Verification Process: A Pilot Study on U.S. and International Medical Graduates

  • Nyapati R. RaoEmail author
  • Rahul Kodali
  • Ayesha Mian
  • Ujjwal Ramtekkar
  • Chella Kamarajan
  • Michael D. Jibson
Original Article



The authors report on a pilot study of the experiences and perceptions of foreign international medical graduate (F-IMG), United States international medical graduate (US-IMG), and United States medical graduate (USMG) psychiatric residents with the newly mandated Clinical Skills Verification (CSV) process. The goal was to identify and suggest remedies to any problems with the implementation of CSV in order to facilitate its success as an evaluation tool with all the three groups of residents.


The authors designed a 51-item survey questionnaire to gather demographic data and information about three principal content areas: 1) views on the effectiveness of the program; 2) the assessment experience; and 3) evaluation and feedback. A link to the survey was e-mailed to the directors of nine general-psychiatry residency programs in the United States with a request to forward it to the residents. The data were collected from February 2010 through March 2010.


Sixty-three general-psychiatry residents (51.2% of 123 eligible residents) from nine selected programs completed the entire survey. Both IMG and USMG residents felt that the CSV was helpful in improving their clinical skills. Both groups of IMG residents, in contrast to their USMG counterparts, wanted more supervised interviews and were more likely to experience feedback as excessively negative and critical. In comparison to USMGs and US-IMGs, F-IMGs were less comfortable conducting an observed interview. They also had had less exposure to and experience with the CSV processes before their residency.


Most residents reported positive experiences with the CSV. The survey also revealed notable commonalities and differences between IMG and USMG residents in their experiences and perceptions of the CSV process, mostly related to their cultural and medical school backgrounds. Authors recommend that residency programs take definitive steps toward addressing the unique needs of these groups of residents.


Academic Psychiatry Residency Training Acad Psychiatry Psychiatric Resident International Medical Graduate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Rao NR: Psychiatric workforce: past legacies, current dilemmas, and future prospects. Acad Psychiatry 2003; 27:238–240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kramer MN: The educational needs of international medical graduates in psychiatric residencies. Acad Psychiatry 2005; 29:322–324PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Faulkner LR: ABPN Certification, Recertification, and Maintenance of Certification: History, Current Status, and Future Directions. ABPN Update 2007; 13:1–3; available at Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moran M. New ABPN: Executive Sees Big Changes for Board Examinations. Psychiatric News. 2006 May 19;Sect. 10.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    AADPRT: Clinical Skills Verification, 2010; available at:
  6. 6.
    ACGME: ACGME Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in Psychiatry, 2007; available at:
  7. 7.
    Shute VJ: Focus on Formative Feedback, 2007; available at:
  8. 8.
    Rao NR: International Medical Graduates, in Handbook of Psychiatric Education and Faculty Development. Edited by Kay J, Silberman EK, Pessar L. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Association, 1999Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Reddy IR: Undergraduate psychiatry education: present scenario in India. Indian J Psychiatry 2007; 49:157–158PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Trivedi JK, Dhyani M: Undergraduate psychiatric education in South Asian countries. Indian J Psychiatry 2007; 49:163–165PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zisook S, Balon R, Björkstén KS, et al: Psychiatry residency training around the world. Acad Psychiatry 2007; 31:309–325PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zinberg NE: The private versus the public psychiatric interview. Am J Psychiatry 1985; 142:889–894PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Searight HR, Gafford J: Behavioral science education and the international medical graduate. Acad Med 2006; 81:164–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Boulet JR, McKinley DW, Whelan GP, et al: Clinical skills deficiencies among first-year residents: utility of the ECFMG clinical skills assessment. Acad Med 2002; 77(Suppl):S33–S35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rothman AI, Cusimano M: A comparison of physician examiners’, standardized patients’, and communication experts’ ratings of international medical graduates’ English proficiency. Acad Med 2000; 75:1206–1211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Forrest DV, Ryan JH, Lazar V: American familiar language and the FMG psychiatry resident. J Psychiatr Educ 1978; 2:68–82; available at Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stephanie W: Course Helps IMGs Adapt to Psychiatric Practice in U.S. Psychiatric News 2009; 44:4.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Academic Psychiatry 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nyapati R. Rao
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rahul Kodali
    • 1
  • Ayesha Mian
    • 1
  • Ujjwal Ramtekkar
    • 1
  • Chella Kamarajan
    • 1
  • Michael D. Jibson
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesNassau University Medical CenterEast Meadow

Personalised recommendations