Academic Psychiatry

, Volume 36, Issue 2, pp 85–90 | Cite as

Recruiting Researchers in Psychiatry: The Influence of Residency vs. Early Motivation

  • Edward K. Silberman
  • Richard Belitsky
  • Carol Ann Bernstein
  • Deborah L. Cabaniss
  • Holly Crisp-Han
  • Leah J. Dickstein
  • Alan S. Kaplan
  • Donald M. Hilty
  • Carol C. Nadelson
  • Stephen C. Scheiber
Original Article

Abstract

Background

The declining numbers of clinician-researchers in psychiatry and other medical specialties has been a subject of growing concern. Residency training has been cited as an important factor in recruiting new researchers, but there are essentially no data to support this assertion. This study aimed to explore which factors have influenced motivation to conduct research among senior psychiatry residents.

Methods

The authors surveyed senior residents, inquiring about their level of interest in research, demographics, background, research experiences, and factors influencing motivation for research. The authors had confirmed participation from 16 of 33 residency programs with a class size of 10 or more. They received 127 responses, a 67% response rate, from participating programs.

Results

Residents with high stated interest in research differed from those with low and moderate interest in their research-intense post-residency plans. They were more likely to have graduate degrees. Those planning research careers had a consistent pattern of interest and involvement in research, starting well before residency. The majority of residents had had research exposure in college, but research involvement of those with very high versus lower interest diverged sharply thereafter. Those with high research interest were overwhelmingly male and tended to have lower debt than those with less interest.

Conclusion

The great majority of residents appear to have decided whether or not to pursue a research career by the time they reached residency, and few of those with less than the highest research interest were enrolled in research tracks. Efforts to increase recruitment into research should center on identifying early developmental influences, eliminating barriers specific to women, and ensuring adequate funding to provide secure careers for talented potential researchers.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Rosenberg LE: Physician-scientists: endangered and essential. Science 1999; 283:331–332PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kupfer DJ, Hyman SE, Schazberg AF, et al: Recruiting and retaining future generations of physician-scientists in mental health. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2002; 59:657–660PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kunik ME, Hudson S, Schubert B, et al: Growing our own: a regional approach to encouraging psychiatric residents to enter research. Acad Psychiatry 2008; 32:236–240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yager J, Greden J, Abrams M, et al: The Institute of Medicine’s report on Research Training in Psychiatry Residency: Strategies for Reform: background, results, and follow-up. Acad Psychiatry 2004; 28:267–274PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ledley FD, Lovejoy FH Jr: Factors influencing the interests, career paths, and research activities of recent graduates from an academic pediatric residency program. Pediatrics 1993; 92:436–441PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Leebens PK, Walker DE, Leckman JF: Determinants of academic survival: survey of AACAP Poster authors. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1993; 32:453–461PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Segal LS, Houts PS, Stillman PL, et al: The association between students’ research involvement in medical school and their postgraduate medical activities. Acad Med 1990; 65:530–533PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Neinstein LS, MacKenzie RG: Prior training and recommendations for future training of clinical research faculty members. Acad Med 1989; 64:32–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee TH, Ognibene FP, Schwartz JS: Correlates of external research support among respondents to the 1990 American Federation for Clinical Research survey. Clin Res 1991; 39: 135–144PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pincus HA, Haviland MG, Dial TH, et al: The relationship of postdoctoral research training to current research activities of faculty in academic departments of psychiatry. Am J Psychiatry 1995; 152:596–601PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leibenluft E, Dial TH, Haviland MG, et al: Sex differences in rank attainment and research activities among academic psychiatrists. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1993; 50:896–904PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Levinson W, Kaufman K, Clark B, et al: Mentors and role models for women in academic medicine. West J Med 1991; 154:423–426PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academic Psychiatry 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward K. Silberman
    • 1
  • Richard Belitsky
    • 2
  • Carol Ann Bernstein
    • 3
  • Deborah L. Cabaniss
    • 4
  • Holly Crisp-Han
    • 5
  • Leah J. Dickstein
    • 6
  • Alan S. Kaplan
    • 7
  • Donald M. Hilty
    • 8
  • Carol C. Nadelson
    • 9
  • Stephen C. Scheiber
    • 10
  1. 1.Dept. of PsychiatryTufts Medical CenterBoston
  2. 2.Dept. of PsychiatryYale Univ. School of MedicineNew Haven
  3. 3.Dept. of PsychiatryNew York Univ.New York
  4. 4.New York State Psychiatric InstituteNew York
  5. 5.Dept. of PsychiatryBaylor College of MedicineHouston
  6. 6.Dept. of PsychiatryUniv. of LouisvilleLouisville
  7. 7.University Health NetworkToronto General HospitalTorontoCanada
  8. 8.Dept. of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesUCDMCSacramento
  9. 9.Office for Women’s CareersBrigham & Women’s HospitalBrookline
  10. 10.ABPNEvanston

Personalised recommendations