The structural theory and physical organic chemistry
- 47 Downloads
Woolley's revolutionary proposal that quantum mechanics does not sanction the concept of “molecular structure”—which is but only a “metaphor”—has fundamental implications for physical organic chemistry. On the one hand, the Uncertainty Principle limits the precision with which transition state structures may be defined; on the other, extension of the structure concept to the transition state may be unviable. Attempts to define transition states have indeed caused controversy. Consequences for molecular recognition, and a mechanistic classification, are also discussed.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.H.M. Leicester, The Historical Background of Chemistry, Wiley, New York, 1956, chapters 18 and 19.Google Scholar
- 3.L.P. Hammett, Physical Organic Chemistry, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1970, chapter 5.Google Scholar
- 5. a)P.W. Atkins, Molecular Quantum Mechanics, 2nd Ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1983, chapters 1 and 5.Google Scholar
- 6.H.C. Brown, The Nonclassical Ion Problem, Plenum, New York, 1977.Google Scholar
- 10.E.L. Eliel, Stereochemistry of Carbon Compounds, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1962, pp. 222–224, 288–290.Google Scholar
- 11.H.O. House, Modern Synthetic Reactions, 2nd Ed., Benjamin, Menlo Park, 1972, pp. 261–262.Google Scholar
- 13.J. Rebek, Jr. Top. Curr. Chem. 149, 189 (1988); T. Endo, ibid. Top. Curr. Chem. 128, 91 (1985).Google Scholar
- 14.J. March, Advanced Organic Chemistry, 3rd Ed., Wiley, New York, 1985 pp. 457–458.Google Scholar
- 16.H. Primas, Chimia 36, 293 (1982).Google Scholar