Systematics based solely on structuralist principles is non-science because it is derived from first principles that are inconsistent in dealing with both synchronic and diachronic aspects of evolution, and its evolutionary models involve hidden causes, and unnameable and unobservable entities. Structuralist phylogenetics emulates axiomatic mathematics through emphasis on deduction, and “hypotheses” and “mapped trait changes” that are actually lemmas and theorems. Sister-group-only evolutionary trees have no caulistic element of scientific realism. This results in a degenerate systematics based on patterns of fact or evidence being treated as so fundamental that all other data may be mapped to the cladogram, resulting in an apparently well-supported classification that is devoid of evolutionary theory. Structuralism in systematics is based on a non-ultrametric analysis of sister-group informative data that cannot detect or model a named taxon giving rise to a named taxon, resulting in classifications that do not reflect macroevolutionary changes unless they are sister lineages. Conservation efforts are negatively affected through epistemological extinction of scientific names. Evolutionary systematics is a viable alternative, involving both deduction and induction, hypothesis and theory, developing trees with both synchronic and diachronic dimensions often inferring nameable ancestral taxa, and resulting in classifications that advance evolutionary theory and explanations for particular groups.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Aczel A (2007) The Artist and the Mathematician: The Story of Nicolas Bourbaki, the Genius Mathematician Who Never Existed. London: High Stakes.
Assis LCS, Rieppel O (2010) Are monophyly and synapomorphy the same or different? Revisiting the role of morphology in phylogenetics. Cladistics 26: 1–9.
Aubin D (1997) The withering immortality of Nicolas Bourbaki: A cultural connector at the confluence of mathematics, structuralism, and the Oulipo in France. Science in Context 10: 297–342.
Avise JC (2000) Cladists in wonderland. Evolution 54: 1828–1832.
Balzer W, Moulines CU, Sneed JD (1987) An Architectonic for Science: The Structuralist Approach. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Barry P (2002) Structuralism. Beginning Theory: An Introduction to Literary and Cultural Theory. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
Batten D, Salthe S, Boschetti F (2008) Visions of evolution: Self-organization proposes what natural selection disposes. Biological Theory 3: 17–29.
Beatty J (1994) Theoretical pluralism in biology, including systematics. In: Interpreting the Hierarchy of Nature (Grande L, Rieppel O, eds), 33–60. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Bell JL (1981) Category theory and the foundations of mathematics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 32: 349–358.
Bessey CE (1915) The phylogenetic taxonomy of flowering plants. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 2: 109–233.
Bock WJ (2004) Explanations in systematics. In: Milestones in Systematics Systematics Association Special Vol. 67 (Williams DM, Forey PL, eds), 49–56. London: CRC Press.
Bok C (2001) Pataphysics: The Poetics of an Imaginary Science. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Bowler PJ (1989) Evolution: The History of an Idea. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Brading K, Landry E (2006) Scientific structuralism: Presentation and representation. Philosophy of Science 73: 571–581.
Brower AVZ (2000) Evolution is not a necessary assumption of cladistics. Cladistics 16: 143–154.
Brown S, De Jonckheere JF (1999) A re-evaluation of the amoeba genus Vahlkampfia based on SSUrDNA sequences. European Journal of Protistology 35: 49–54.
Brummitt RK (2003) Further dogged defense of paraphyletic taxa. Taxon 52: 803–804.
Brummitt RK (2006) Am I a bony fish? Taxon 55: 268–269.
Buhay JE (2009) “COI-like” sequences are becoming problematic in molecular systematic and DNA barcoding studies. Journal of Crustacean Biology 29: 96–110.
Burke J (1995) The Day the Universe Changed: How Galileo’s Telescope Changed the Truth and Other Events in History that Dramatically Altered Our Understanding of the World. New York: Back Bay Books.
Cain AJ (1959) Deductive and inductive methods in post-Linnaean taxonomy. Proceedings of the Linnean Society London 170: 185–217.
Carle FL (1995) Evolution, taxonomy, and biogeography of ancient Gondwanian libelluloides, with comments on anisopteroid evolution and phylogenetic systematics (Anisoptera: Libelluloidea). Odonatologica 24: 383–506.
Cavalier-Smith T (2010) Deep phylogeny, ancestral groups and the four ages of life. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 365: 111–132.
Chesterton GK ( 1956) St. Thomas Aquinas. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Cleland CE (2001) Historical science, experimental science, and the scientific method. Geology 29: 987–990.
Cohen J (1994) The world is round (p <.05). American Psychologist 49: 997–1003.
Colborn J, Crabtree RE, Shaklee JB, Pfeiler E, Bowen BW (2001) The evolutionary enigma of bonefishes (Albula spp.): Cryptic species and ancient separations in a globally distributed shorefish. Evolution 55: 807–820.
Cunningham CW, Omland KE, Oakley TH (1998) Reconstructing ancestral character states: A critical reappraisal. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13: 361–366.
Dayrat B (2005) Ancestor-descendant relationships and the reconstruction of the tree of life. Paleobiology 31: 347–353.
Dewey J (1909) The influence of Darwinism on philosophy. Popular Science Monthly 75: 90–98.
Dewey J (1950) Reconstruction in Philosophy. With a New Introduction. New York: Mentor Book, New American Library.
Dobzhansky T (1956) What is an adaptive trait? American Naturalist 90: 337–347.
Dosse F (1998) History of Structuralism, Vol. 1: The Rising Sign 1945–1966. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Farjon A (2007) In defense of a conifer taxonomy which recognizes evolution. Taxon 56: 639–641.
Farris JS, Kluge AG, Eckardt M (1970) A numerical approach to phylogenetic systematics. Journal of Zoology 19: 172–189.
Frost-Arnold G (2010) The no-miracles argument for realism: Inference to an unacceptable explanation. Philosophy of Science 77: 35–58.
Funk DJ, Omland KE (2003) Species-level paraphyly and polyphyly: Frequency, causes, and consequences, with insights from animal mitochondrial DNA. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 34: 397–423.
Giere RN (2005) Modest evolutionary naturalism. Biological Theory 1: 52–60.
Giere RN (2009) Essay review: Scientific representation and empiricist structuralism. Philosophy of Science 76: 101–111.
Gigerenzer G (2007) Gut Feelings: The Intelligence of the Unconscious. New York: Viking Penguin.
Gigerenzer G, Swijtink Z, Porter T, Daston L, Beatty J, Küger L (1989) The Empire of Chance: How Probability Changed Science and Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gilbert SF, Opitz JM, Raff RA (1996) Resythesizing evolutionary and developmental biology. Developmental Biology 173: 357–372.
Gishtick A (2006) Baraminology. Reports of the National Center for Science Education 26(4): 17–21. http://ncse.com/rncse/26/4/baraminology (accessed September 2, 2010).
Gontcharov AA, Melkonian M (2005) Molecular phylogeny of Staurastrum Meyen ex Ralfs and related genera (Zygnematophyceae, Streptophyta) based on coding and noncoding rDNA sequence comparisons. Journal of Phycology 41: 887–899.
Gould SJ (1970) Dollo on Dollo’s Law: Irreversibility and the status of evolutionary laws. Journal of the History of Biology 3: 189–212.
Gould SJ (2002) The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Grant V (2003) Incongruence between cladistic and taxonomic systems. American Journal of Botany 90: 1263–1270.
Griffiths PE (1996) Darwinism, process structuralism, and natural kinds. Philosophy of Science 63: S1–S9.
Hair JF Jr, Anderson RE, Tatham RL (1987) Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings. New York: Macmillan.
Hanc J, Tuleja S, Hancova M (2003) Simple derivation of Newtonian mechanics from the principle of least action. American Journal of Physics 71: 386–391.
Hart MW, Byrne M, Johnson SL (2003) Patiriella pseudoexigua (Asteroidea: Asterinidae): A cryptic species complex revealed by molecular and embryological analyses. Journal of the Marine Biology Association UK 83: 1109–1116.
Hebert PDN, Gregory T (2005) The promise of DNA barcoding for taxonomy. Systematic Biology 54: 842.
Hickey DA (2000) The evolution of sex and recombination. In: Evolutionary Genetics: From Molecules to Morphology (Singh RS, Krimbas CB, eds), 314–330. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Holton G (1993) Science and Anti-Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hörandl E (2006) Paraphyletic versus monophyletic taxa: Evolutionary versus cladistic classifications. Taxon 55: 564–570.
Hörandl E (2007) Neglecting evolution is bad taxonomy. Taxon 56: 1–5.
Hörandl E, Stuessy TF (2010) Paraphyletic groups are natural evolutionary units and acceptable in biological classification. Taxon 59: 1641–1653.
Hull DL (2005) The essence of scientific theories. Biological Theory 1: 17–19.
Hutchinson JMC, Gigerenzer G (2005) Simple heuristics and rules of thumb: Where psychologists and behavioural biologists might meet. Behavioural Processes 69: 97–124.
Jablonski D (2007) Scale and hierarchy in macroevolution. Palaeontology 50: 87–109.
Jacquette D (1996) On defoliating Meinong’s Jungle. Axiomathes 1–2: 17–42.
Jardine N, Sibson R (1971) Mathematical Taxonomy. London: John Wiley.
Jarman SN, Elliott NG (2000) DNA evidence for morphological and cryptic Cenozoic speciations in the Anaspididae, “living fossils” from the Triassic. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 13: 624–633.
Jaynes J ( 2000) The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind. New York: Houghton-Mifflin, Mariner Books.
King JL, Hanner R (1998) Cryptic species in a “living fossil” lineage: Taxonomic and phylogenetic relationships within the genus Lepidurus (Crustacea: Notostraca) in North America. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 10: 23–36.
Kline M (1980) Mathematics: The Loss of Certainty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Knox EB (1998) The use of hierarchies as organizational models in systematics. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society of London 63: 1–49.
Kress WJ, Wurdack KJ, Zimmer EA, Weigt LA, Janzen DH (2005) Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 102: 8369–8374.
Kuhn T (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kuusela J, Ziẹtara MS, Lumme J (2008) Description of three new European cryptic species of Gyrodactylus Nordmann, 1832 supported by nuclear and mitochondrial phylogenetic characterization. Acta Parasitologica 53: 120–126.
Lee T, Foighil DÓ (2004) Hidden Floridian biodiversity: Mitochondrial and nuclear gene trees reveal four cryptic species within the scorched mussel, Brachidontes exustus, species complex. Molecular Ecology 13: 3527–3542.
Lee M, Wolsan M (2004) Integration, individuality, and species concepts. Biology and Philosophy 17: 651–660.
Lévi-Strauss C ( 1969) The Elementary Structures of Kinship (Needham R, trans). Boston: Beacon Press.
Lewis H (1962) Catastrophic selection as a factor in speciation. Evolution 16: 257–271.
Lewis H (1966) Speciation in flowering plants. Science 3152: 167–172.
Lewis H, Roberts MR (1956) The origin of Clarkia lingulata. Evolution 10: 126–138.
Lopez PA (1990) Closet pataphysics. http://www.paulavion.com/pata/cpat.html (accessed September 2, 2010).
Matthews P (2001) A Short History of Structural Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mayden RL (1997) A hierarchy of species concepts: The denouement in the sage of the species problem. In: Species: The Units of Biodiversity (Claridge MR, Dawah HA, Wilson MR, eds), 381–424. London: Chapman & Hall.
Mayer MS, Beseda L (2010) Reconciling taxonomy and phylogeny in the Streptanthus glandulosus complex (Brassicaceae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 97: 106–116.
Mayr E, Bock WJ (2002) Classifications and other ordering systems. Journal of Zoological Evolutionary Research 40: 169–194.
McShea DW (2005) The evolution of complexity without natural selection, a possible large-scale trend of the fourth kind. Paleobiology 31: 146–156.
Mercier H, Sperber D (2011) Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34: 57–74.
Molbo D, Machado CA, Sevenster JG, Keller L, Herre EA (2003) Cryptic species of fig-pollinating wasps: Implications for the evolution of the fig-wasp mutualism, sex allocation, and precision of adaptation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 100: 5867–5872.
Mooi RD, Gill AC (2010) Phylogenies without synapomorphies—a crisis in fish systematics: Time to show some character. Zootaxa 2450: 26–40.
Nelson G (1989) Cladistics and evolutionary models. Cladistics 5: 275–289.
Ogrodnik B (2004) The metaphysical dimension of optimizing principles. Concrescence: Australasian Journal for Process Thought 5: 1–5.
Okasha S (2003) Does the concept of “clade selection” make sense? Philosophy of Science 70: 739–751.
O’Keefe FR, Sander PM (1999) Paleontological paradigms and inferences of phylogenetic pattern: A case study. Paleobiology 25: 518–533.
Oppenheimer JR (1957) Physics in the contemporary world. In: Great Essays in Science (Gardner M, ed), 188–204. New York: Washington Square Press.
Overton WF (1975) General systems, structure and development. In: Structure and Transformation: Developmental and Historical Aspects, Vol. 3 (Riegel K, Rosenwald GC, eds), 61–81. New York: Wiley.
Padial JM, Miralles A, De la Riva I, Vences M (2010) The integrative future of taxonomy. Frontiers in Zoology 7: 1–16. http://www.frontiersinzoology.com/content/7/1/16 (accessed September 2, 2010).
Pelser PB, Nordenstam B, Kadereit JW, Watson LE (2007) An ITS phylogeny of tribe Senecioneae (Asteraceae) and a new delimitation of Senecio L. Taxon 56: 1077–1104.
Piaget J (1970) Structuralism. New York: Basic Books.
Poole M (1990) A Guide to Science and Belief. Oxford: Lion Publishing.
Popper KR (1959) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books.
Qiu Y-L, Chase MW, Les DH, Parks CR (1993) Molecular phylogenetics of the Magnoliidae: Cladistic analyses of nucleotide sequences of the plastid gene rbcL. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 587–606.
Racheli L, Racheli T (2006) Phylogenetic hypothesis and classification: Theoretical and methodological issues with reference to some studies on Saturniidae (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae). SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología 34(133): 5–12.
Rees M (2000) Just Six Numbers: The Deep Forces that Shape the Universe. New York: Basic Books.
Ridley M (1996) Evolution, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Science.
Rieppel O (2010) The series, the network, and the tree: Changing metaphors of order in nature. Biology and Philosophy 25: 475–496.
Rieppel O (2011) Willi Hennig’s dichotomization of nature. Cladistics 27: 103–112.
Rieppel O, Grande L (1994) Summary and comments on systematic pattern and evolutionary process. In: Interpreting the Hierarchy of Nature (Grande L, Rieppel O, eds), 227–255. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Rieseberg LH, Brouillet L (1994) Are many plant species paraphyletic? Taxon 43: 21–32.
Rubinoff D, Cameron S, Will K (2006) A genomic perspective on the shortcomings of mitochondrial DNA for “barcoding” indentification. Journal of Heredity 97: 581–594.
Sardar Z (2000) Thomas Kuhn and the Science Wars. Cambridge: Icon Books.
Schmidt H-J (2008) Structuralism in physics. In: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring ed (Zalta EN, ed) //html: plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2008/entries/physics-structuralism
Schneider H, Smith AR, Pryer KM (2009) Is morphology really at odds with molecules in estimating fern phylogeny? Systematic Botany 34: 455–475.
Scott-Ram NR (1990) Transformed Cladistics, Taxonomy and Evolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sneath PHA (1995) Thirty years of numerical taxonomy. Systematic Biology 44: 281–298.
Sober E (2008) Evidence and Evolution: The Logic Behind the Science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Nickrent DL, Johnson LA, Hahn WJ, Hoot SB, Sweere JA, Kuzoff RK, Kron DA, Chase MW, Swensen SM, Zimmer EA, Chaw S-M, Gillespie LJ, Kress WJ, Sytsma KJ (1997) Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S ribosomal DNA sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 84: 1–49.
Sosef MSM (1997) Hierarchical models, reticulate evolution and the inevitability of paraphyletic supraspecific taxa. Taxon 46: 75–85.
Stein G (1937) Everybody’s Autobiography. New York: Random House.
Stuart BL, Inger RF, Voris HK (2006) High level of cryptic species diversity revealed by sympatric lineages of Southeast Asian forest frogs. Biological Letters 2: 470–474.
Stuessy TF (2009) Paradigms in biological classification (1707–2007): Has anything really changed? Taxon 58: 68–76.
Stuessy TF, Crawford DJ, Anderson GJ, Jensen RJ (1998) Systematics, biogeography and conservation of Lactoridaceae. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 1: 267–290.
Stuessy TF, König C (2008) Patrocladistic classification. Taxon 57: 594–601.
van Fraasen BD (2007) Structuralism(s) about science: Some common problems. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplement 81: 45–61.
van Wyk AE (2007) The end justifies the means. Taxon 56: 645–648.
Vasek FC (1968) The relationships of two ecologically marginal sympatric Clarkia populations. American Naturalist 102: 25–40.
Wagner WH Jr (1952) The fern genus Diellia: Its structure, affinities and taxonomy. University of California Publications in Botany 26: 1–212 (pl. 1–21).
Wilkinson L, Rosenthal R, Abelson R, Cohen J, Aiken L, Appelbaum M, Boodoo G, Kenny DA, Kraemer H, Rubin D, Thompson B, Wainer H (1999) Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist 54: 594–604.
Williams DM, Ebach MC (2007) Foundations of Systematics and Biogeography. New York: Springer.
Zander RH (2007a) Nine easy steps for constructing reliable trees from published phylogenetic analyses. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 94: 691–709.
Zander RH (2007b) When biodiversity study and systematics diverge. Biodiversity 8: 43–48.
Zander RH (2007c) Paraphyly and the species concept, a reply to Ebach & al. Taxon 56: 642–644.
Zander RH (2008a) Statistical evaluation of the clade “Rhabdoweisiaceae.” Bryologist 111: 292–301.
Zander RH (2008b) Evolutionary inferences from non-monophyly of traditional taxa on molecular trees. Taxon 57: 1182–1188.
Zander RH (2009) Evolutionary analysis of five bryophyte families using virtual fossils. Anales del Jardín Botánico de Madrid 66: 263–277.
Zander RH (2010) Taxon mapping exemplifies punctuated equilibrium and atavistic saltation. Plant Systematics and Evolution 286: 69–90.
About this article
Cite this article
Zander, R.H. Structuralism in Phylogenetic Systematics. Biol Theory 5, 383–394 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1162/BIOT_a_00063