Biological Theory

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 225–229 | Cite as

Homology: Integrating Phylogeny and Development

  • Marc EreshefskyEmail author


Natural Kind Biological Theory Developmental Mechanism Hind Wing Developmental Factor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abouheif E (1997) Developmental genetics and homology: A hierarchical approach. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12: 405–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abouheif E (1999) Establishing homology criteria for regulatory gene networks: Prospects and challenges. In: Homology (Bock GR, Cardew G, eds), 207–221. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Boyd R (1999) Homeostasis, species, and higher taxa. In: Species: New Interdisciplinary Studies (Wilson R, ed), 141–185. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Brigandt I (2007) Typology now: Homology and developmental constraints explain evolvability. Biology and Philosophy 22: 709–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. de Beer G (1971) Homology: An Unresolved Problem. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. de Pinna M (1991) Concepts and tests of homology in the cladistic paradigm. Cladistics 7: 367–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ereshefsky M (2007a) Psychological categories as homologies: Lessons from ethology. Biology and Philosophy 22: 659–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ereshefsky M (2007b) Foundational issues concerning taxa and taxon names. Systematic Biology 56: 295–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ereshefsky M (in press) What’s wrong with the new biological essentialism. Philosophy of Science.Google Scholar
  10. Farris J, Platnick N (1989) Lord of the flies: The systematist as study animal. Cladistics 5: 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ghiselin M (2005) Homology as a relation of correspondence between parts of individuals. Theory in Biosciences 124: 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gould SJ (2002) The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Grant T, Kluge AG (2004) Transformation series as an ideographic character concept. Cladistics 20: 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Griffiths PE (1994) Cladistic explanation and functional explanation. Philosophy of Science 61: 206–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Griffiths PE (2007) The phenomena of homology. Biology and Philosophy 22: 643–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hall BK (2003) Descent with modification: The unity underlying homology and homoplasy as seen through an analysis of development and evolution. Biological Reviews 78: 409–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hall BK (2007) Homology and homoplasy. In: Philosophy of Biology (Matthen M, Stephens C, eds), 429–454. Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Laubichler M (2000) Homology in development and the development of the homology concept. American Zoologist 40: 777–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lauder G (1994) Homology, form, and function. In: Homology: The Hierarchical Basis of Comparative Biology (Hall B, ed), 151–196. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mayr E (1969) Principles of Systematic Zoology. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  21. Minelli AM (1998) Molecules, developmental modules, and phenotypes: A combinatorial approach to homology. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 9: 340–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Müller G (2003) Homology: The evolution of morphological organization. In: Origination of Organismal Form: Beyond the Gene in Developmental and Evolutionary Biology (Müller G, Newman S, eds), 51–69. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  23. Owen R (1843) Lectures on the Comparative Anatomy and Physiology of the Invertebrate Animals. London: Longman, Brown, Green and Longmans.Google Scholar
  24. Patterson C (1982) Morphological characters and homology. In: Problems of Phylogenetic Reconstruction (Joysey K, Friday A, eds), 21–74. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  25. Patterson C (1987) Introduction. In: Molecules and Morphology in Evolution: Conflict or Compromise? (Patterson C, ed), 1–22. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Remane A (1952) Die Grundlagen des natürlichen Systems, der vergleichenden Anatomie und der Phylogenetik. Leipzig, Germany: Geest und Portig.Google Scholar
  27. Rieppel O (2005) Modules, kinds, and homology. Journal of Experimental Zoology (Molecular and Developmental Evolution) 304B: 18–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rieppel O (2007) Homology: A philosophical and biological perspective. In: Handbook of Paleoanthropology (Henke W, Tattersall I, eds), 217–240. Berlin, Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rieppel O, Kearney M (2007) The poverty of taxonomic characters. Biology and Philosophy 22: 95–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sneath P, Sokal R (1973) Numerical Taxonomy. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.Google Scholar
  31. Striedter GF (1999) Homology in the nervous system: Of characters, embryology and levels of analysis. In: Homology (Bock GR, Cardew G, eds), 158–170. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  32. Striedter GF, Northcutt GR (1991) Biological hierarchies and the concept of homology. Brain, Behavior and Evolution 38: 177–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tautz D (1998) Debatable homologies. Nature 395: 17–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Van Valen LM (1982) Homology and causes. Journal of Morphology 173: 305–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wagner G (1989) The biological homology concept. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 20: 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wagner G (1996) Homologues, natural kinds and the evolution of modularity. American Zoologist 36: 36–43.Google Scholar
  37. Wagner G (1999) A research programme for testing the biological homology concept. In: Homology (Bock GR, Cardew G, eds), 125–134. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  38. Wagner G (2001) Characters, units and natural kinds: An introduction. In: The Character Concept in Evolutionary Biology (Wagner G, ed), 1–10. London: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wagner G (2007) The developmental genetics of homology. Nature Reviews Genetics 8: 473–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wake D (1994) Comparative terminology. Science 265: 268–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wake D (1999) Homoplasy, homology and the problem of “sameness” in biology. In: Homology (Bock GR, Cardew G, eds), 24–33. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  42. Wake D (2003) Homology and homoplasy. In: Keywords and Concepts in Evolutionary Developmental Biology (Hall BK, Olson WM, eds), 191–200. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations