Advertisement

Biological Theory

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 244–249 | Cite as

Institutions as Mechanisms of Cultural Evolution: Prospects of the Epidemiological Approach

  • Christophe Heintz
Article

Abstract

Studying institutions as part of the research on cultural evolution prompts us to analyze one very important mechanism of cultural evolution: institutions do distribute cultural variants in the population. Also, it enables relating current research on cultural evolution to some more traditional social sciences: institutions, often seen as macro-social entities, are analyzed in terms of their constitutive micro-phenomena. This article presents Sperber’s characterization of institutions, and then gives some hints about the set of phenomena to which it applies.

Culture evolves through the advent of cognitive causal chains, which span across individuals and their environment, and which distribute mental representations and public production in the population and its habitat. Institutions are characterized by the specific causal chains that distribute representations. These chains include representations that cause the recurrence of a series of events and thus regulate the distribution of a set of representations to which they themselves belong. Saying that some cultural phenomenon is an institution is, in this theoretical framework, explaining that some representations that are part of the cultural phenomenon cause it to endure.

This technical characterization applies to what is usually understood as institutions, from marriage to money. It also opens the way for the analysis of complex phenomena in cultural evolution, such as the maintenance of cultural niches and the distribution of labor.

Keywords

cultural epidemiology cultural evolution institutions regulative representations Dan Sperber 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barnes B (1983) Social life as bootstrapped induction. Sociology 17: 524–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blackmore S (1999) The Meme Machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bowles S, Choi JK, Hopfensitz A (2003) The co-evolution of individual behaviors and social institutions. Journal of Theoretical Biology 223: 135–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1985) Culture and the Evolutionary Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cavalli-Sforza LL, Feldman MW (1981) Cultural Transmission and Evolution: A Quantitative Approach. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Dawkins R (1982) The Extended Phenotype. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Dunbar R, Knight C, Power C, eds (1999) The Evolution of Culture. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Heintz C (2007) Scientific Cognition and Cultural Evolution. Doctoral dissertation, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Paris, France. http://christophe.heintz.free.fr/thesis Google Scholar
  9. Levinson SC, Jaisson P, eds (2005) Evolution and Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Lewis D (1969) Convention. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. North D (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Odling-Smee FJ, Laland KN, Feldman MW (2003) Niche Construction: The Neglected Process in Evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Richerson PR, Boyd R (2005) Not By Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Searle JR (1995) The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  15. Searle JR (2005) What is an institution? Journal of Institutional Economics 1: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sperber D (1996) Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  17. Sperber D (1997) Individualisme méthodologique et cognitivisme. In: Cognition et sciences sociales (Boudon R, Chazel F, Bouvier A, eds), 123–136. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  18. Sperber D (2000) An objection to the memetic approach to culture. In: Darwinizing Culture: The Status of Memetics as a Science (Aunger R, ed), 163–173. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Sperber D (2001) Conceptual tools for a natural science of society and culture. Proceedings of the British Academy, 111: 297–317.Google Scholar
  20. Sperber D (2007) Rudiments d’un programme naturaliste. In: Les Sciences sociales en mutation (Wieworka M, ed), 257–264. Auxerre: Editions Sciences Humaines.Google Scholar
  21. Sperber D, Claidière N (2006) Why modeling cultural evolution is still such a challenge. Biological Theory 1: 20–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sterelny K (2003) Thought in a Hostile World: The Evolution of Human Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  23. Tomasello M (1999) The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Witt U (2003) The Evolving Economy: Essays on the Evolutionary Approach to Economics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.KLI for Evolution and Cognition ResearchAltenbergAustria

Personalised recommendations