Advertisement

Biological Theory

, Volume 4, Issue 4, pp 333–339 | Cite as

Knowing As Making, Making As Knowing: The Many Lives of Synthetic Biology

  • Evelyn Fox Keller
Article

Abstract

The ways in which the various activities of synthetic biology connect to those of conventional biology display both a multiplicity and variety that reflect the multiplicity and variety of meanings for which the term synthetic biology has been invoked, today as in the past. Central to this variety, as well as to the connection itself, is the complex relationship between knowing (understanding, representing) and making (constructing, intervening) that has prevailed in the life sciences. That relationship is the focus of this article. More specifically, my aim is to explore the different assumptions about how knowing is related to making that have prevailed, implicitly or explicitly in the various activities—now or in the past—subsumed under the name synthetic biology.

Keywords

efficiency engineering material models practical cause synthetic biology technoscience theoretical models understanding 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bensaude-Vincent B (2008) Technoscience and convergence: A transmutation of values? Available at http://www.ethicschool.eu
  2. Boncheva M, Gracias DH, Jacobs HO, Whitesides GM (2002) Biomimetic self-assembly of a functional asymmetrical electronic device. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 99: 4937–4940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Collingwood RG ([1940] 1998) An Essay on Metaphysics. Oxford: Clarendon. Rev. ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Greenfield D, McEvoy AL, Shroff H, Crooks GE, Wingreen NS, Betzig E, Liphardt J (2009) Self-Organization of the Escherichia coli chemotaxis network imaged with super-resolution light microscopy. PLoS Biology 7(6): e1000137. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000137 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hacking I (1983) Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Keller EF (1996) The biological gaze. In: Future Natural (Robertson G, Mash M, Tickner L, Bird J, Curtis B, Putnam T, eds), 107–121. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Keller EF (2002) Making Sense of Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Keller EF (2009) What does synthetic biology have to do with biology? BioSocieties 4: 275–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Leduc S (1910) Théorie Physico-Chimique de la Vie et Générations Spontanées. Paris: A. Poinat.Google Scholar
  10. Leduc S (1911) The Mechanism of Life (Butcher WD, trans). New York: Rebman Co.; London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  11. Leduc S (1912) La Biologie Synthétique, Etude de Biophysique. Paris: A. Poinat.Google Scholar
  12. Loeb J (1912) The Mechanistic Conception of Life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pauly PJ (1987) Controlling Life: Jacques Loeb and the Engineering Ideal in Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Turing AM (1952) The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B237: 37–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Weinberg, RA (1985) The molecules of life. Scientific American 253(4): 4857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wilson EB (1900) Aspects of recent biological research. International Monthly 2: 86–88.Google Scholar
  17. Woodward J (2003) Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Yim M, Shen W-M, Salemi B, Rus D, Moll M, Lipson H, Klavins E, Chirikjian GS (2007) Modular self-reconfigurable robot systems, 2007. Robotics and Automation Magazine, IEEE 14(1): 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Yin P, Choi HMT, Calvert CR, Pierce NA (2008) Programming biomolecular self-assembly pathways. Nature 451: 318–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Program in Science, Technology, and SocietyMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations