Advertisement

H.264/AVC Video Compressed Traces: Multifractal and Fractal Analysis

  • Irini ReljinEmail author
  • Andreja Samčović
  • Branimir Reljin
Open Access
Research Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Advanced Video Technologies and Applications for H.264/AVC and Beyond

Abstract

Publicly available long video traces encoded according to H.264/AVC were analyzed from the fractal and multifractal points of view. It was shown that such video traces, as compressed videos (H.261, H.263, and MPEG-4 Version 2) exhibit inherent long-range dependency, that is, fractal, property. Moreover they have high bit rate variability, particularly at higher compression ratios. Such signals may be better characterized by multifractal (MF) analysis, since this approach describes both local and global features of the process. From multifractal spectra of the frame size video traces it was shown that higher compression ratio produces broader and less regular MF spectra, indicating to higher MF nature and the existence of additive components in video traces. Considering individual frames (I, P, and B) and their MF spectra one can approve additive nature of compressed video and the particular influence of these frames to a whole MF spectrum. Since compressed video occupies a main part of transmission bandwidth, results obtained from MF analysis of compressed video may contribute to more accurate modeling of modern teletraffic. Moreover, by appropriate choice of the method for estimating MF quantities, an inverse MF analysis is possible, that means, from a once derived MF spectrum of observed signal it is possible to recognize and extract parts of the signal which are characterized by particular values of multifractal parameters. Intensive simulations and results obtained confirm the applicability and efficiency of MF analysis of compressed video.

Keywords

Fractal Analysis Global Feature Frame Size Video Compress Multifractal Spectrum 

References

  1. 1.
    Rao K, Bojkovic Z, Milovanovic D: Multimedia Communication Systems: Techniques, Standards, and Networks. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA; 2002.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang Y, Osterman J, Zhang YQ: Video Processing and Communications. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA; 2002.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schäfer R, Wiegand T, Schwarz H: The emerging H.264/AVC standard. EBU Technical Review 2003., (293):Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    ITU-T H.263 Recommendation, ITU-T, Geneva, Switzerland, 2000Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Draft ITU-T Rec. H.264, ISO/IEC 14496-10, 2002 EGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Garrett M: Contributions toward real-time services on packet switched networks, M.S. thesis. Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; 1993.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Riedi R, Vehel JL: Multifractal properties of TCP traffic: a numerical study. In INRIA Research Report 3129. INRIA, Rocquencourt, Le Chesnay Cedex, France; 1997. https://doi.org/www.stat.rice.edu/%7Eriedi/cv_publications.htmlGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fitzek F, Reisslein M: MPEG-4 and H.263 video traces for network performance evaluation. In TKN Technical Report TKN-00-06. Technical University Berlin, Berlin, Germany; 2000.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Reisslein M, Lassetter J, Ratnam S, Lotfallah O, Fitzek F, Panchanathan S: Traffic and quality characterization of scalable encoded video: a large-scale trace-based study, part 1: overview and definitions. Telecommunications Research Center, Department of Electrical Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Ariz, USA; 2002.https://doi.org/peach.eas.asu.edu/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reisslein M, Lassetter J, Ratnam S, Lotfallah O, Fitzek F, Panchanathan S: Traffic and quality characterization of scalable encoded video: a large-scale trace-based study, part 2: statistical analysis of single-layer encoded video. Telecommunications Research Center, Department of Electrical Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Ariz, USA; 2002.https://doi.org/www.eas.asu.edu/traceGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reisslein M, Lassetter J, Ratnam S, Lotfallah O, Fitzek F, Panchanathan S: Traffic and quality characterization of scalable encoded video: a large-scale trace-based study, part 3: statistical analysis of temporal scalable encoded video. Telecommunications Research Center, Department of Electrical Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Ariz, USA; 2002.https://doi.org/www.eas.asu.edu/traceGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fitzek F, Zorzi M, Seeling P, Reisslein M: Video and audio trace files of pre-encoded video content for network performance measurements. Telecommunications Research Center, Department of Electrical Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Ariz, USA; 2003.https://doi.org/www.eas.asu.edu/traceGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Krishna M, Gadre V, Desai U: Multifractal Based Network Traffic Modeling. Kluwer Academic Press, Boston, Mass, USA; 2003.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
    Reljin I: Neural network based cell scheduling in ATM node. IEEE Communications Letters 1998, 2(3):78–80. 10.1109/4234.662633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Reljin I, Reljin B: Neurocomputing in teletraffic: multifractal spectrum approximation. Proceedings of the 5th Seminar on Neural Network Applications in Electrical Engineering (NEUREL '00), September 2000, Belgrade, Yugoslavia 24–31.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reljin B, Reljin I: Multimedia: the impact on the teletraffic. In Book 2. Edited by: Mastorakis N. World Scientific and Engineering Society Press, Clearance Center, Danvers, Mass, USA; 2000:366–373.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Reljin I, Reljin B: Statistical and multifractal characteristics of H.263 compressed video streams. In Proceedings of 20th Symp. on New Technologies in Post and Telecomm. Traffic, December 2002, Belgrade, Yugoslavia. Faculty of Traffic Eng.; 193–205.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Reljin I, Reljin B: Fractal and multifractal analyses of compressed video sequences. Facta Universitatis (NIS) Series: Electronics and Energetics 2003, 16(3):401–414. 10.2298/FUEE0303401RzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Taqqu M, Teverovsky V, Willinger W: Estimators for long-range dependence: an empirical study. Fractals 1995, 3(4):785–788. 10.1142/S0218348X95000692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Roughan M, Veitch D, Abry P: On-line estimation of the parameters of long-range dependence. Proceedings of IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM '98), November 1998, Sydney, NSW, Australia 6: 3716–3721.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Beran I: Statistics for Long-Memory Processes. Chapman & Hall, New York, NY, USA; 1994.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Reljin I: A neural network control of ATM multiplexer, M.S. thesis. Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Yugoslavia; 1998.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Reljin B, Reljin I: Neural networks in teletraffic control: pro et contra? Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Telecommunications in Modern Satellite, Cable and Broadcasting Services (TELSIKS '99), October 1999, Niš, Yugoslavia 2: 518–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mandelbrot B: The Fractal Geometry of Nature. W. H. Freeman, New York, NY, USA; 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Peitgen H, Jurgens H, Saupe D: Chaos and Fractals. Springer, New York, NY, USA; 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Turner M, Blackledge J, Andrews P: Fractal Geometry in Digital Imaging. Academic Press, New York, NY, USA; 1998.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Evertsz C, Mandelbrot B: Multifractal measures. Appendix B. In Chaos and Fractals. Edited by: Peitgen H, Jurgens H, Saupe D. Springer, New York, NY, USA; 1992:849–881.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Iannaccone P, Khokha M (Eds): Fractal Geometry in Biological Systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA; 1996.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Véhel JL, Mignot P: Multifractal segmentation of images. Fractals 1994, 2(3):371–377. 10.1142/S0218348X94000466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Véhel JL: Introduction to the multufractal analysis of images. INRIA, Rocquencourt, Le Chesnay Cedex, France; 1996.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Reljin I, Reljin B: Fractal geometry and multifractals in analyzing and processing medical data and images. Archive of Oncology 2002, 10(4):283–293. 10.2298/AOO0204283RCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Stojic T, Reljin I, Reljin B: Adaptation of multifractal analysis to segmentation of microcalcifications in digital mammograms. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 2006, 367: 494–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chhabra A, Jensen R:Direct determination of the f(Open image in new window) singularity spectrum. Physical Review Letters 1989, 62(12):1327–1330. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.1327MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
  36. 36.

Copyright information

© Reljin et al. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Irini Reljin
    • 1
    Email author
  • Andreja Samčović
    • 2
  • Branimir Reljin
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Electrical EngineeringUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia and Montenegro
  2. 2.Faculty of Traffic and Transport EngineeringUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia and Montenegro

Personalised recommendations