Performance Evaluation of Indoor Localization Techniques Based on RF Power Measurements from Active or Passive Devices

  • Damiano De LucaEmail author
  • Franco Mazzenga
  • Cristiano Monti
  • Marco Vari
Open Access
Research Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Wireless Location Technologies and Applications


The performance of networks for indoor localization based on RF power measurements from active or passive devices is evaluated in terms of the accuracy, complexity, and costs. In the active device case, the terminal to be located measures the power transmitted by some devices inside its coverage area. To determine the terminal position in the area, power measurements are then compared with the data stored in an RF map of the area. A network architecture for localization based on passive devices is presented. Its operations are based on the measure of the power retransmitted from local devices interrogated by the terminal and on their identities. Performance of the two schemes is compared in terms of the probability of localization error as a function of the number (density) of active or passive devices. Analysis is carried out through simulation in a typical office-like environment whose propagation characteristics have been characterized experimentally. Considerations obtained in this work can be easily adapted to other scenarios. The procedure used for the analysis is general and can be easily extended to other situations.


Information Technology Performance Evaluation Propagation Characteristic Quantum Information Localization Error 


  1. 1.
    Bahl P, Padmanabhan VN: RADAR: An in-building RFbased user location and tracking system. Proceedings of the 19th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM-2000), March 2000, Tel Aviv, Israel 2: 775–784.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bahl P, Padmanabhan VN, Balachandran A: A software system for locating mobile users: design, evaluation, and lessons. MSR Technical Report MSR-TR-2000-12 February 2000.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bahl P, Venkata N, Padmanabhan N, Balachandran A: Enhancements to the RADAR user location and tracking systems. Microsoft Research Technical Report MSR-TR-2000-12 February 2000.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Borrelli A, Monti C, Vari M, Mazzenga F: Channel models for IEEE 802.11b indoor system design. IEEE International Conference on Communications, June 2004, Paris, France 6: 3701–3705.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Finkenzeller K: RFID Handbook: Fundamentals and Applications in Contactless Smart Cards and Identification. 2nd edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA; 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fontana RJ: Recent Applications of Ultra Wideband Radar and Communications Systems.
  7. 7.
    Hightower J, Borriello G: A survey and taxonomy of location systems for ubiquitous computing. Technical Report UW-CSE 01-08-03 August 2001.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Prasithsangareel P, Krishnamurty P, Chrysantis PK: On indoor position location with wireless LANS. International Symposium on Personal, Indoors and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC '02), September 2002, Lisboa, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Priyantha NB, Chakraborty A, Baladrishnan H: The cricket location-support system. Proceedings of the 6th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MOBICOM '00), August 2000, Boston, Mass, USA 32–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    PULSERS : Pervasive Ultra-wideband Low Spectral Energy Radio Systems. EU-IST Programme (FP6),
  11. 11.
    Van Diggelen F, Abraham C: Indoor GPS Technology. CTIA, Dallas, Tex, USA, May 2001Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wolfle G, Wertz P, Landstorfer FM: Performance, accuracy and generalization capability of indoor propagation models in different types of buildings. Proceedings of 10th IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC '99), September 1999, Osaka, JapanGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Specification of the Bluetooth System version: 1.2 05 November 2003,
  14. 14.
    ISO/IEC 802-11: 1999(E), "Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications" ANSI/IEEE Std 802.11, 1999 EditionGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
    Philips EPC 1.19 G2 RFID ASIC,
  18. 18.

Copyright information

© De Luca et al. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Damiano De Luca
    • 1
    Email author
  • Franco Mazzenga
    • 2
  • Cristiano Monti
    • 2
  • Marco Vari
    • 1
  1. 1.RadioLabsConsorzio Università Industria-Laboratori di RadiocomunicazioniRomaItaly
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Ingegneria Elettronica, Facoltà di IngegneriaUniversità degli Studi di Roma "Tor Vergata,"RomaItaly

Personalised recommendations