Skip to main content
Log in

The econ in econophysics

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal Special Topics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Modern authors have identified a variety of striking economic patterns, most importantly those involving the distribution of incomes and profit rates. In recent times, the econophysics literature has demonstrated that bottom incomes follow an exponential distribution, top incomes follow a Pareto, and profit rates display a tent-shaped distribution. This paper is concerned with the theory underlying various explanations of these phenomena Traditional econophysics relies on energy-conserving “particle collision” models in which simulation is often used to derive a stationary distribution Those in the Jaynesian tradition rely on entropy maximization, subject to certain constraints, to infer the final distribution. This paper argues that economic phenomena should be derived as results of explicit economic processes For instance, the entry and exit process motivated by supply decisions of firms underlies the drift-diffusion form of wage, interest and profit rates arbitrage. These processes give rise to stationary distributions that turn out to be also entropy maximizing. In the arbitrage approach, entropy maximization is a result. In the Jaynesian approach, entropy maximization is the means.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S.M. Alfarano, A. Irle Milaković, J. Kauschke, J. Econ. Dyn. Control 36, 136 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J.C. Cox, J.E. Ingersoll, S.A. Ross, Econometrica 53, 385 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. A.A. Dragulescu, V.M. Yakovenko, Eur. Phys. J. B 17, 723 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. A.A. Dragulescu, V.M. Yakovenko, Eur. Phys. J. B 20, 585 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Dragulescu, V. Yakovenko, Quant. Finance Res. Paper 2 443 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. X. Gabaix, Annu. Rev. Econ. 1, 255 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. X. Gabaix, J. Econ. Perspect. 30, 185 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J.D.A. Islas-Garca, A.R. Villagomez-Manrique, M. Castillo-Mussot, P.G. Soriano-Hernandez, Rev. Mex. Fis. E 65, 1 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. E.T. Jaynes, Proc. IEEE 70, 939 (1982)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. S. Kotz, K. Tomasz, P. Krzysztof, The Laplace Distribution and Generalizations: A Revisit with Applications to Communications, Economics, Engineering, and Finance (Springer Science & Business, 2001)

  11. C.G. Lamoureux, H. Douglas Witte, J. Finance 57, 1479 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Mitzenmacher, Internet Math. 1, 226 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Ragab, New School Soc. Res., unpublished Ph.D Dissertation, 2013

  14. H. Risken, F. Till, The Fokker-Planck Equation: Methods of Solution and Applications (Springer Science & Business Media, 1996)

  15. W.E.G. Salter, Productivity and Technical Change (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1969)

  16. E. Scharfenaker, F. Duncan, Maximum Entropy Estimation of Statistical Equilibrium in Economic Quantal Response Models, New School for Social Research, Department of Economics, Working Papers 1710, 2017

  17. E. Scharfenaker, G. Semieniuk, A Statistical Equilibrium Approach to the Distribution of Profit Rates, in The New School for Social Research, Working Paper Series (2015)

  18. A. Shaikh, Capitalism: Competition, Conflict, Crises (Oxford University Press, New York, 2016)

  19. A. Shaikh, J.E. Jacobo, Economic Arbitrage and the Econophysics of Income Inequality, New School Economic Papers, 1902

  20. A. Shaikh, N. Papanikolaou, N. Weiner, Physica A 415, 54 (2014)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. C.A. Silva, V.M. Yakovenko, Europhys. Lett. 3, 1 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. V. Venkatsubramanian, How Much Inequality is Fair? Mathematical Principles of a Moral, Optimal, and Stable Capitalist Society (Columbia University Press, New York, 2017)

  23. V.M. Yakovenko, Research in Econophysics, in The Photon, online newspaper (Department of Physics, University of Maryland, Maryland, 2003), p. 1

  24. V.M. Yakovenko, https://arXiv:0709.3662 (2007)

  25. V.M. Yakovenko, J. Barkley Rosser, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1703 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anwar Shaikh.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

The EPJ Publishers remain neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shaikh, A. The econ in econophysics. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 229, 1675–1684 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2020-900204-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2020-900204-5

Navigation