Skip to main content
Log in

Advantages of q-logarithm representation over q-exponential representation from the sense of scale and shift on nonlinear systems

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal Special Topics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Addition and subtraction of observed values can be computed under the obvious and implicit assumption that the scale unit of measurement should be the same for all arguments, which is valid even for any nonlinear systems. This paper starts with the distinction between exponential and non-exponential family in the sense of the scale unit of measurement. In the simplest nonlinear model dydx = yq, it is shown how typical effects such as rescaling and shift emerge in the nonlinear systems and affect observed data. Based on the present results, the two representations, namely the q-exponential and the q-logarithm ones, are proposed. The former is for rescaling, the latter for unified understanding with a fixed scale unit. As applications of these representations, the corresponding entropy and the general probability expression for unified understanding with a fixed scale unit are presented. For the theoretical study of nonlinear systems, q-logarithm representation is shown to have significant advantages over q-exponential representation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R.C. Tolman,The Principles of Statistical Mechanics (Dover, 2010)

  2. W. Greiner,Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (Springer, 2010)

  3. T.M. Cover, J.A. Thomas,Elements of information theory, 2nd edn (Wiley, 2006)

  4. F. Nielsen, V. Garcia, https://arXiv:0911.4863 (2009)

  5. C. Tsallis, Physica D 193, 3 (2004)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. L. Nivanen, A. Le Mehautem, Q.A. Wang, Rep. Math. Phys. 52, 437 (2003)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. E.P. Borges, Physica A 340, 95 (2004)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. H. Suyari, Physica A, 368, 63 (2006)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. C. Tsallis,Introduction to Nonextensive Statistical Mechanics: Approaching a ComplexWorld (Springer, 2009)

  10. A.M. Scarfone, Entropy 15, 624 (2013)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. C. Tsallis, J. Stat. Phys. 52, 479 (1988)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Einstein, Ann. Phys. 33, 1275 (1910)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. H. Suyari, M. Tsukada, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 51, 753 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. H. Matsuzoe, A.M. Scarfone, T. Wada, LNCS 11712, 279 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. Thurner, R. Hanel, P. Klimek,Introduction to the Theory of Complex Systems (Oxford Univ. Press, 2018)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroki Suyari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Suyari, H., Matsuzoe, H. & Scarfone, A.M. Advantages of q-logarithm representation over q-exponential representation from the sense of scale and shift on nonlinear systems. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 229, 773–785 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2020-900196-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2020-900196-x

Navigation